Are the knicks the worst team in the league?

by **DaTruth36** on Fri Mar 31, 2006 10:20 am

Well, personally, I think so.

They have no chemistry, they're coaches and players have hatred between each other, and quite frankly, I find it pathetic.

Let's take a vote, shall we?

by **KIG1** on Fri Mar 31, 2006 10:24 am

I dont think so, the Bobcats are right now.

They suck without Emeka

by **The_Flying_Tomato** on Fri Mar 31, 2006 10:37 am

can't the league step in like with Belkin and ditch Thomas? He's a horrible GM

by **Jugs** on Fri Mar 31, 2006 10:53 am

boston are the worst team because they're good at everything!

by **Axel** on Fri Mar 31, 2006 11:13 am

I'd say so. You are what your record is, and right now the Knicks have the worst record.

by **Colin** on Fri Mar 31, 2006 11:23 am

New York is the worst TEAM. Because the talent they have is pretty good. There's just no chance of them meshing, and little effort made to try and get them to mesh.

by **DaTruth36** on Fri Mar 31, 2006 11:24 am

Jugs_ wrote:boston are the worst team because they're good at everything!

What are you talking about??

by **BIG GREEN** on Fri Mar 31, 2006 11:25 am

Even as a knicks fan by default...i must admit they suck the best.

by **R.J.** on Fri Mar 31, 2006 11:37 am

Jugs_ wrote:boston are the worst team because they're good at everything!

Was that supposed to be funny?

by **Jeffx** on Fri Mar 31, 2006 12:00 pm

Colin wrote:New York is the worst TEAM. Because the talent they have is pretty good. There's just no chance of them meshing, and little effort made to try and get them to mesh.

Talent? They may have good athletic skills, but they have ZERO basketball I.Q. Knicks are one of the dumbest teams I've ever seen. Knicks have been bad before, but never like this. With Isiah & Dolan in charge, you young Knick fans are fooling yourselves if you think things will get better. Like Mitch Lawrence said in today's Daily News, Isiah has assembled the biggest bunch of losers & quitters to ever put on a Knick uniform. The following articles are a must-read:

Disgrace Grows at the Garden:

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/baske ... 2416c.html

Larry Brown and the Knicks at a Total Loss:

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/baske ... 2418c.html

by **DaTruth36** on Fri Mar 31, 2006 12:11 pm

I don't know if it's just me, but I think Stephon Marbury is on crack. :shock:

by **Axel** on Fri Mar 31, 2006 12:42 pm

He's not the only one on crack.

by **Colin** on Fri Mar 31, 2006 12:43 pm

Jeffx wrote:
Colin wrote:New York is the worst TEAM. Because the talent they have is pretty good. There's just no chance of them meshing, and little effort made to try and get them to mesh.

Talent? They may have good athletic skills, but they have ZERO basketball I.Q. Knicks are one of the dumbest teams I've ever seen.

That's what I meant.

by **Its_asdf** on Fri Mar 31, 2006 12:49 pm

Simple answer. Yes.

The only thing they have going for them is Channing Frye... And of course, the legendary Qyntel Woods.

by **streetballaz1** on Fri Mar 31, 2006 12:58 pm

i think the bobcats are the worst team in the nba. They are already eliminated from the playoff like the knicks and blazers(same record as them). They lost their best player okafor. If you take NY,they have many talented players and they are only one lost behind Charlotte.

by **Amphatoast** on Fri Mar 31, 2006 4:01 pm

Yes the knicks are easily the worst team in the NBA. You may say the Bobcats but they've beaten the knicks 2-0 so far this year.

Let's see.
knicks got highest payroll
knicks have a lot of talent
knicks have a hall of fame coach
knicks live in the basketball mecca

for them to play at the level of an expanision team is unacceptable. Clearly something is wrong. They have -0% chemistry. Yes, negative zero. They just sign a bunch of players, trade for names, sign a coach cause of his reputation, throw it all together and nothing goes right.
To top it off they decided to gasp everyone this year by winning 6 in a row. Win 6, then lose like 24 of 26 games? Bobcats hanging tough with that talent they got minus emeka. Knicks, show no signs of anything.

by **kevC** on Fri Mar 31, 2006 4:12 pm

I don't know about this, Portland is pretty horrible. I'd say the Knicks is the worst "franchise" because they're in such a big hole. At least Portland has some cap space (I think?).

by **The_Flying_Tomato** on Fri Mar 31, 2006 4:33 pm

number of close games. you gotta factor that in. i've noticed the cats have lost a least like 5 or so by just a few points

by **Colin** on Fri Mar 31, 2006 4:47 pm

PHX4LIFE wrote:number of close games. you gotta factor that in. i've noticed the cats have lost a least like 5 or so by just a few points

You have 54 posts today...

Settle down.

I've made 54 posts in the last 10 days.

by **Amphatoast** on Fri Mar 31, 2006 5:06 pm

portland had injury problems with daruis miles... bobcats have injury problems with emeka...the knicks???
oh thats right, Jerome James was injuried.

by **The_Flying_Tomato** on Fri Mar 31, 2006 5:07 pm

yeah, i get 54 posts a day when i have nothing better to do and i'm banned from realgm

by **Amphatoast** on Fri Mar 31, 2006 5:42 pm

u might get ban from nlsc soon if u keep it up lol

Bluesky · by **Andrew** on Fri Mar 31, 2006 6:24 pm

They have some talent but they can't do anything with it. They're hovering around the bottom of the standings in a race for last place with the Bobcats and they're in a bad position heading into the offseason. If their roster is too good to be considered the absolute bottom of the barrel, they've still got to be bottom three.

by **cklitsie** on Fri Mar 31, 2006 8:45 pm

They're the worst team, but I think Portland and Charlotte seem to suck less too because they don't get as much attention in the press.

by **dada** on Fri Mar 31, 2006 9:21 pm

With regards to...

Talent- no
Play- yes

Are the knicks the worst team in the league?

Knicks, worst team?

Are the knicks the worst team in the league?

Who is online