jason kidd trade possibilities

by **Donatello** on Thu Dec 09, 2004 4:39 am

what do you guys think might happen? how about this possiblity:

http://www.oregonlive.com/blazers/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/sports/1102424250156630.xml

the nets might as well dump everything

by **Riot** on Thu Dec 09, 2004 4:42 am

Yeah, I heard that Blazers or Wolves might trade for Kidd.

For the Blazers I heard Rahim and Anderson for Kidd

For the Wovles I heard Cassell, Sprewell and Olowokandi for Kidd, Mourning

by **8-Hype** on Thu Dec 09, 2004 4:52 am

Oh, man, that would make a team out of the Nets. They don't have any good player at all, except Kidd, Jefferson and Mourning. They gotta give something to get some good players.

by **Rip32** on Thu Dec 09, 2004 7:09 am

C-Mourning
PF-Garnett
SF Szcerbiak(sp?)
SG Hassel
PG Kidd

Championship Material....

@LAST.FM · by **iG®** on Thu Dec 09, 2004 7:24 am

Portland-Van-Exel,Stoudemire,Kidd :roll:

?

by **air gordon** on Thu Dec 09, 2004 7:47 am

Chad FOrd of espn's insider wrote an article about the Net's trade possibilities. It's a pretty good read so i figured i'd share it. Insider articles are difficult to "share", so bare with the html tags within the article...

Nevertheless, sources close to the Nets and Kidd told Insider over the weekend that Kidd still wants to be traded to contender. While Kidd discounted the notion last night that he was returning early to audition for other teams – the truth is that's exactly what he's doing.

If New Jersey president Rod Thorn thought the Nets were still title contenders with Kidd, or could rebuild quickly to that status, he'd likely rebuff Kidd's complaints and hold onto him. However, Thorn knows the team will struggle even with Kidd around. By the time they finally move to Brooklyn, Kidd's best years will have passed.

Thorn knows that Kidd's truly unhappy and believes he was misled when he signed his contract with the Nets last summer. Thorn is also smart enough to know that getting his huge contract off the books could expedite the rebuilding process.

The key for New Jersey is to clear cap space and add one or two young prospects to expedite the rebuilding process.

To get that done, the Nets will try to package Kidd with another unhappy Net, >. Getting both of those players off the books would clear more than $20 million next year and $108 million over the life of the two contracts.

It won't be easy. Kidd makes $14.8 million this year and has five years left on his contract. Mourning makes $5.4 million this year with three years remaining. Factor in that Kidd is 30 years old and Mourning could retire at any moment if his transplanted kidney begins to fail and you're talking about an extraordinary risk by any team that's willing to trade for him.

To complicate matters even further, Kidd has a list of teams that he would play for, narrowing the number of teams Thorn can negotiate with.

Still, with all the caveats and pitfalls clearly noted, as many as eight teams likely will be vying for Kidd's services in the coming weeks as long as he can prove that he's healthy and will have no lingering problems from his knee surgery.

Kidd took the first big step toward proving that on Monday night. Expect Thorn's phone to start ringing this morning.

THE CONTENDERS

Minnesota Timberwolves
The dealhrefSam Cassell and Wally Szczerbiak for Kidd
The other deal: Cassell and Latrell Sprewell</a> for Kidd and Mourning. 
The three-way deal: Cassell and Szczerbiak to Portland; Kidd and Mourning to the Wolves and Shareef Abdur-Rahim, Ervin Johnson, Sebastian Telfair</a> to the Nets.

For: The Timberwolves have been after Kidd since this summer. They were one of the only teams willing to make a trade before seeing Kidd make a successful return from surgery.

The first deal gives the Nets two players for the price of one. Put Cassell on the floor with Szczerbiak and Richard Jefferson and you have plenty of offense.

Deal 2 gives the team about $14 million in cap relief (Spree is off the books at the end of the season) but little else. The team likely would release Spree. He's unhappy in Minnesota. Can you imagine how he'd react going to the Nets?

In either case, the Nets would move Cassell to a third team. He wants a big contract extension (he won't get in New Jersey) and wants to play for a contender.

The best option for the Nets is a three-way with Minnesota and Portland. The Wolves would send Cassell and Szczerbiak to Portland and Johnson to the Nets, the Blazers would send Abdur-Rahim and Telfair to Nets and the Nets would send Kidd and Mourning to Minnesota.

Got all of that?

That move would give the Nets around $18 million in cap room to work with next summer and they'd have their young point guard of the future in Telfair. The Wolves move closer to a championship. A combo of Kidd, KG, Spree, Eddie Griffin and 'Zo and Michael Olowokandi is as good or better than what the Spurs have. The Blazers also get better. They get a good point guard and Szczerbiak, whom they've coveted all summer. That should be enough to push them back into the playoffs in the West.

Against: There are problems with all three deals.

The first one fails to give the Nets any sort of cap relief. While the combo of Cassell, Jefferson and Szczerbiak would be potent, the team still has done nothing to help their frontcourt or salary-cap woes.

In 2002, Abdur-Rahim (left), Kidd and Mourning (standing) were All-Star teammates. Could they soon be involved in a blockbuster trade? The second one gives them cap relief, on Spree's deal, but then leaves them with an unhappy Cassell.

The third one depends on how you view Abdur-Rahim and Telfair. If you think Telfair is the next great thing at point guard and Abdur-Rahim is an underrated four, this deal probably looks great to you. If you think Telfair is overhyped and that Abdur-Rahim is a loser, it suddenly doesn't look so hot.

Insider Verdict: The three-way deal with Portland and Minnesota is the only one that really satisfies what the Nets are after. It gives the team enormous cap room, a young prospect at the point and the ability to re-sign Abdur-Rahim if he fits in with what Frank is doing. While it isn't perfect, it might be the most realistic option out there for the Nets if Portland is willing to drop its pursuit of Vince Carter to do the deal.

Dallas Mavericks
The deal: Jason Terry, Marquis Danielsand <">Alan Henderson</a> for Kidd and Mourning.

For: It's no secret that Mavs owner Mark Cuban has coveted Kidd for a while. He made a serious pitch to Kidd two summers ago when the guard made his free-agent tour but eventually came up empty when the Nets refused to do a sign-and-trade.

Would they be interested now? The Mavs have a ton of assets to use in a trade and an owner that won't gag at the amount of financial risk he has to take.

Terry is a young point guard whose contract expires after the 2005-06 season. Daniels is signed to a long-term deal, but given the talent he's shown over the last year with the Mavs, he could be a bargain. Henderson's contract expires after the season, giving the Mavs $8.2 million in cap relief.

Kidd and Mourning give the Mavs instant credibility in the West. They have looked solid this year at every position but the point. With the ball in Kidd's hands, the Mavs would be even money with the Spurs to make it to the NBA Finals.

That's what Cuban is after, and Kidd might be the only player on the market who could deliver.

Against: That said, will Cuban do the deal? He balked at signing Steve Nash to a lucrative six-year, $60 million offer because of Nash's age and durability. Kidd is older, less durable and makes more money.

The deal also has pitfalls for the Nets.

While Terry is great scorer, he isn't much of a point guard. The fact that he was beaten out by the rookie Devin Harris should be your first clue. Daniels has the chance to be special, but will he fit the Nets' style of play? Henderson gives some cap relief and some help at the four, but getting his contract off the books won't be enough for the Nets to make a serious free-agent play next summer.

The Nets would have to wait until the summer of 2006, when Terry comes off the books, before they'd have enough cap room to make a big splash with free agents.

Insider Verdict: If the Nets can't work out something with Portland and Minnesota for a three-way deal, working out something with Dallas is probably their next best option. Daniels is a very good prospect, Henderson gives some serious cap relief next year and Terry would give them great flexibility in 2006. I also think this is the best fit for Kidd. The Mavs aren't giving up too much depth here and should give Kidd his best shot at an NBA title.

THE LONG SHOTS

Golden State Warriors
The deal:Mickael Pietrus, Speedy Claxton, Cliff Robinson and Dale Davis for Kidd and Mourning.

For: The Nets are looking for young players and expiring contracts, and they get both here. Claxton and Pietrus would form a nice young, athletic backcourt to put alongside Jefferson. They are both signed to small contracts yet have big upsides, especially Pietrus. Robinson and Davis are both in the last years of their contracts and would help clear $16 million off the payroll next summer, giving the Nets around $12 million in cap room for 2005 free agents.

It's also a slam dunk for the Warriors. GM Chris Mullin has been trying to turn around the culture of the Warriors – so far, to no avail. Adding Kidd changes everything. Remember what Kidd did with a young, underachieving team in New Jersey when he got there? Also, remember that Kidd is from the Bay Area and would be a huge draw for the Warriors.

The Warriors could put together a starting five – Kidd, Jason Richardson, Mike Dunleavy, Troy Murphy and Adonal Foyle ; that could make some noise in the West and permanently dissolve the stench the Warriors have made over the past decade.

Against: The Warriors aren't on Kidd's short list of teams he's willing to play for. He's asked the Nets to trade him to a contender, and the Warriors don't qualify. That doesn't mean that Kidd would veto a trade to Golden State, but it would take some convincing.

It's also a major risk for the Warriors. If Kidd gets reinjured, they're screwed. Given the curse that has hung over the franchise the past decade, that doesn't sound far fetched.

Insider Verdict: This is a good deal for the Nets if they can get Kidd and the Warriors to agree. They get young players to develop in the backcourt, including one potential star in Pietrus. They also get the cap room to go out and pursue a decent four or five in free agency next summer. Factor in the three extra first-round picks they acquired this summer and the Nets have a great foundation to build on.

Denver Nuggets
The deal: Andre Miller , Marcus Camby and Nikoloz Tskitishvili> for Kidd and Mourning.

For: If the Nets were to decide that rebuilding wasn't the way to go, the Nuggets could be an interesting option. They have a starting point guard, a starting center and a young seven-footer whose salaries match Kidd and Mourning's.

A combo of Miller, Camby, Jefferson and Jason Collins could be a playoff team. If Camby could stay healthy and Skita could give them real minutes, it might be an improvement for the team. The Nets would still have issues at the two spot and the four, but they do have draft picks that could help lighten the load there.

Kidd would also be a godsend to the Nuggets. The team has struggled this season and needs a more vocal leader than Miller. They also want to run, and there's no better fast- break point guard than Kidd. Nene could immediately move into the starting center position with Mourning providing support off the bench. The only thing a trade like this doesn't address is that gaping hole at the two-guard position for the Nuggets. The team needs a shooter, and Kidd isn't it.

Against: Do the Nets just want to be average? It seems like this trade could propel to the Nets back into the playoffs, but how far would they really go? If the answer is anything other than the Finals, why not keep Kidd and have the same result?

If the Nuggets were to give up Nene as well, then you'd have to say that this was the best trade available for the Nets. But the Nuggets can't afford to do that. It would gut the team, leaving them too vulnerable in the middle. For the Nuggets to make a serious run in the West, they'd need either Nene or Camby. Unfortunately for the Nets, the deal doesn't work under the CBA if you substitute Nene for Camby.

Insider Verdict: Kidd would love to be reunited with the Kenyon Martinin Denver. He'd love to lob passes to Carmelo Anthony and Nene in the paint. In fact, the Nuggets, according to sources, are his first choice. But the trade makes no sense for the Nets without Nene in the deal, and from what I can gather, the Nuggets aren't budging on their refusal to include Nene in this trade.

Seattle SuperSonics
The deal: Ray Allen, Luke Ridnour and Jerome James for Kidd and Mourning.
The other deal: Vitaly Potapenko, Vladimir RadmanovicNick Collison, Ridnour and James for Kidd and Mourning.

For: The first deal would give the Nets a bunch of coveted assets. Allen is still an All-Star and one of the top shooters in the league. He's an unrestricted free agent this summer, meaning there's a risk they could lose him, but it also means that the Nets are not stuck with him if things don't work out. Ridnour is a nice young point guard prospect who's shown major signs of improvement this year. James is a big guy who can play well when he plays hard. He's in the last year of his contract, which is where his real value lies.

Would Sonics' owner Howard Schultz want to break up his team's winning lineup to gamble on Kidd? The deal would give the Sonics one of owner Howard Schultz's favorite players. It would give Nate McMillan the floor leader he's coveted since Gary Payton left town. It would also give them some help inside.

The second deal gives the Nets a couple young prospects in Radmanovic and Collison, and more cap room by including Potapenko, who is also in the last year of his contract. While they don't get a star of Allen's caliber, they do have more young pieces to work with here.

Deal 2 probably makes even more sense for the Sonics. They would be a little thin in the backcourt if they traded Allen away. But if they can keep him, the combo of Kidd, Allen and Rashard Lewis could be the most potent in the league. While the deal leaves the Sonics pretty thin up front, the truth is that of all the bigs heading to New Jersey, Radmanovic is the only one contributing to the team right now.

Against: Two things could really hold a deal like this up. First, Kidd did not include the Sonics on his list of teams he'd play for despite a strong relationship with Schultz. His goal is to win a championship and any way you slice it, it's tough to see how the Sonics win it all with the front line they have.

The second problem is that the Sonics are playing so well right now, they might be unwilling to take the risk on players like Kidd and Mourning. They both represent huge financial risks to a team that has been very risk free since Schultz took over. This might be too big of a gamble for them.

Insider Verdict: On paper, Option 2 is my favorite deal for the Nets. They get three young prospects in Ridnour, Radmanovic and Collison and still clear a ton of cap space. Realistically, however, I don't see it happening. Kidd's interest in the Sonics is minimal and Schultz doesn't seem brave enough to make this type of move.

Portland Trail Blazers
The deal: Shareef Abdur-Rahim,Nick Van Exel and Sebastian Telfair for Kidd, Mourning and Aaron Williams

For:The Nets could abandon the three-way trade talk all together and do a deal directly with the Blazers that would net them even more cap space.

A deal of Abdur-Rahim, Van Exel and Telfair for Kidd, Mourning and Williams would give the Nets a little more than $20 million in cap space next summer once Abdur-Rahim and Van Exel both come off the books. They could even afford to re-sign Abdur-Rahim and still make a major play in the free-agent market.

The deal would give the Blazers a player that could change the whole course of the franchise. The Blazers have been rudderless for years and would welcome Kidd's leadership. He'd be awesome running the floor with Darius Miles and Derek Anderson

Against: Kidd has made it clear that the Blazers aren't on his list of places he wants to be traded. While Thorn could callously trade him there anyway, he probably would opt to just make the three-way deal with Portland and Minnesota.

Insider Verdict I don't see it happening. The Blazers have been after Kidd for a while, but he won't return the love.

Los Angeles Lakers
Kidd originally had the Lakers atop his list of teams to play for, but it looks like it isn't going to happen anytime soon. To get a deal like this done, the Lakers would have to send Lamar Odom Devean George and Chucky Atkins to the Nets for Kidd and Mourning. While that may be acceptable to the Lakers (though they'd take a huge hit in the rebounding department without Odom), it won't get it done for New Jersey. As much as they like Odom, he isn't enough to put them over the top. Why spend all that money when you aren't going to be a contender?

San Antonio Spurs
The Spurs made a huge push for Kidd two summers ago, but their interest in him has cooled considerably. They just signed Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili to huge free-agent contracts this summer, essentially killing any chance they have of making a deal. The only deal that would work under the cap for the Spurs would be something that sent Rasho Nesterovic, Malik Rose, > and Bruce Bowen for Kidd and Mourning. Neither side would be willing to do that deal. Kidd knows now that he should've picked the Spurs over the Nets in the summer of 2003. But it's the Spurs that ended up better off because he didn't.

by **Matthew** on Thu Dec 09, 2004 8:02 am

Good read limp (Y)

.

I like the trade to Denver the best. It would help both teams. I don't think the nets are willing to throw their season in just yet, and this would give them some talent in miller and camby. I'd like to see this trade go through.

by **Riot** on Thu Dec 09, 2004 8:13 am

Chad Ford is an idiot.

New Jersey doesn't want Wally's contract, so they would want the expiring contract of Latrell Sprewell insetad.

Sprewell, Cassell for Kidd, Mourning.

Think about throwing this lineup out there for 10-15 minutes a night:

Hudson
Kidd
Hassell
Garnett
Griffin

And the starting lineup of:
Kidd
Hassell
Wally
KG
Zo? Kandi? Madsen?

off the bench:
Hudson
Hoiberg
?
Griffin
Zo or Kandi

by **NNpF** on Thu Dec 09, 2004 8:44 am

I like the Portland deal, the deal with the Nuggets will not help them at all. Since they are already rebuilding, they might as well take it slow and make good decisions, the Nuggets deal doesn't help too much.

I'm the person who thinks Abdur-Rahim is underrated and Telfair can be a good PG in the future, so you should see why I like this deal. If Shareef doesn't fit in they can just let him go and have even more CAP space.

by **air gordon** on Thu Dec 09, 2004 8:52 am

i agree that ford can be an idiot but when he comes out with articles like this, they have some credibility

ford has a good understanding of player contracts and stays in contact with all the GMs in the league

i'd like to see kidd in denver as well. too bad ford doesn't list the actual list of teams that kidd wants to play for

riot: would NJ want to take on sprewell? he has a lot of baggage right now. how would spree respond from playing on a contender to a bottom feeder?

by **Riot** on Thu Dec 09, 2004 9:04 am

Nets would just cut Sprewell since he has one year left, get that 14 mill contract out of the way (basically, you just got rid of Kidd's contract).

Then trade sam to a contender (HOUSTON?) for some more cap or picks or something.

by **-BHZMAFIA-** on Thu Dec 09, 2004 9:51 am

the grizz have been trying to get him as well because new jersey GM like Jwill because he brings a good fan base with him because his flashy play and jwill has been on the trade block, but i dont think we going to get him since we have watson. we might get a big man or get VC

by **J@3** on Thu Dec 09, 2004 11:34 am

Riot wrote:Chad Ford is an idiot.

One of the most accurate statements I've ever read. today

by **Riot** on Thu Dec 09, 2004 11:38 am

Well, he is.

Sometimes he just makes up trades just to be heard.

by **J@3** on Thu Dec 09, 2004 11:42 am

Yeah I know. I'm still trying to work out why Portland would trade the rookie PG they wanted so badly in the draft after a couple of months.

by **matmat8** on Thu Dec 09, 2004 11:54 am

Acording to real gm...Kidd's list of teams he wants to play for are Timberwolves, Nuggets, Mavericks, Spurs, Lakers. He said he wouldn't report to portland if traded there.
I can't beleive this, he signs a huge contract, then asks to be traded, and gives a list of teams he wants to play for. Of course the nets let Martin go and i understand kidd wants to be traded but still. O'neal wannabe...

by **Riot** on Thu Dec 09, 2004 12:37 pm

I don't blame him. He could have gone to the Spurs but he stayed with the Nets because he was loyal and wanted to play with kmart and rjeff. But then the team trades all their players just to make their team more attractive to sell. I would be P/O'd too because my career isn't going to last forever and I just signed prolly my last contract with this dump of a team.

by **Ataraxia** on Thu Dec 09, 2004 1:43 pm

phew ! .....Dre's really steppin it up in the recent games, today was a g-nite

hmm I think Portland and Toronto might be front runners.....gotta feeling the Nets might look at one of those teams.

by **Riot** on Thu Dec 09, 2004 1:50 pm

Kidd said he wouldn't play for Portland.

by **Ataraxia** on Thu Dec 09, 2004 2:01 pm

Riot wrote:Kidd said he wouldn't play for Portland.

Francis said he didnt wanna play for Orlando if they didnt get Shaq :wink:

I dunno, its really hard to see where he could go.....but hes gonna be a big gamble specially if he goes down injured. Portland have sick depth at the PG, so they can afford it....but not sure abt the other clubs.

by **XianeX** on Thu Dec 09, 2004 3:14 pm

Kidd wants to come back to his homestate. There have been articles for the past 3 summers or so saying that he wants to come back to California (preferably his hometown, Oakland) so it isn't a longshot.

by **EGarrett** on Sat Dec 11, 2004 6:20 am

The question is...what can we get for the future in exchange for Kidd?

We don't need any more draft picks, that's for sure.

Minnesota can send us some bad contracts and old guys, and some cap room with Sprewell. That's not enough.

We're also fortunate enough to have a part-time Center in Alonzo that we can trade. There are plenty of teams that could use a point guard and/or a Center. We just have to make sure we get something worthwhile in return.

Shareef? Possibly, if Portland throws in one of their three or four point guards. Since we're trying to rebuild, I'd trade Kidd for Shareef and Telfair, with whatever else was necessary to fix the cap. Throw in Mourning and/or Aaron Williams and give us Stoudamire or Van Exel for now, whoever we can get rid of soon.

The Blazers with Kidd, Randolph, Miles, Derek Anderson and co. would be a great fullcourt team and would have a scoring option in the post.

It's too bad Phoenix probably won't take our calls. Kidd and Mourning and Barbosa and Nash would be pretty cool.

Heck, I'd send Kidd and Mourning to Toronto for Alston, Vince and Rafael Araujo. Throw in Aaron Williams if they want another big guy.

We just need some young guys for later.

by **TAJ MAHAL** on Sat Dec 11, 2004 7:53 am

if kidd is gonna leave he should at least go to a team that can get a ring.

by **Matt** on Sat Dec 11, 2004 2:33 pm

if i was GM i'd trade his ass to Atlanta for requesting a trade.

by **#12** on Sat Dec 11, 2004 3:38 pm

he will atlanta is good. He'll make childress, harrington/walker a star

jason kidd trade possibilities

jason kidd trade possibilities

Who is online