by Andrew on Tue Aug 10, 2004 9:48 pm
Shawn Kemp did not play for an NBA team for the first time since entering the league in 1989 this past season. After watching his decline post-1998, it's amazing to think that he was once considered one of the most exciting players and talented forwards in the NBA, often used in promotional media and frequently featured in the highlight reels.
The question on my mind is, in his heyday could Shawn Kemp be considered a superstar?
In terms of his statistics, most people would probably answer no. Although they made him a top 10 forward from about 1992 to 1998, his career numbers are not quite up to the same level as the great forwards throughout history. Since he failed to win a championship, some might simply dismiss him as an All-Star player on a good team rather than assigning him "Superstar" status.
But I would argue that other elements define superstar players, at least in terms of their own era. Compared to the legends of the NBA, Kemp may not be a superstar or a candidate for the title of "Best We've Ever Seen", but in terms of the era he played in, I think he can be labelled a superstar.
Consider his popularity. A home video ("Shawn Kemp: The Reignman") was even released, chronicling his career up until 1995. The video was part of the NBA's "Superstars" series which included profile videos for players such as Michael Jordan, Shaquille O'Neal, Hakeem Olajuwon, Magic Johnson and Larry Bird. Now, it would be foolish to judge a player's status by the label on a video, but it is an example of the other element that can make a player a superstar.
Shawn Kemp was a very popular player in the mid 90s. Replicas of his jersey generally sold well, with his athletic ability and spectacular dunks winning him many fans. His continued improvement throughout the first five or six years of his career established him as one of the league's top power forwards and made him a fixture on the All-Star team.
Such accomplishments might not gain entry to the Hall, they might not place someone in that elite group considered to be basketball's finest, but they do make a player significant to an era in NBA history. Shawn Kemp is one of those players that in his best years was a special player in the NBA. He is one of those players who will be brought up when the 1990s are discussed.
I think Kemp qualifies as a superstar of the mid 90s, similar to Grant Hill and Anfernee Hardaway. Even though he may not have lived up to all the expectations once he established himself as an important player in the NBA, he remains a significant player in his own era.
Does anyone else have some thoughts about the Reignman and his place in NBA history?