Sun Feb 29, 2004 9:24 pm
The Article wrote:Los Angeles Lakers guard Gary Payton, frustrated by what he said was both limited playing time and the team's triangle offense under Phil Jackson, said on Saturday that he may leave the team after the season. Payton signed a two-year deal with the Lakers but has an option to get out of the deal after the season.
Sun Feb 29, 2004 10:56 pm
Mon Mar 01, 2004 12:31 am
Mon Mar 01, 2004 2:06 am
"Karl could pass the ball, and he could get you layups," Payton said. "Me and him was in pick and roll, and we was running, and we were getting the ball out. Now, we're getting the ball, and we go straight to the offense. We're not running. We're not running as much, and that was where I was getting my easy baskets. Now, we don't run."
"I think that's probably one of the things (play defense) that he wanted to do more than anything else ... is that he wanted to have an influence on Bibby, so he couldn't get going," Jackson said. "He wanted to wear at him when he did get going, early in the ballgame, and he didn't have that opportunity. And (Bibby) hit a couple of shots down the stretch that were big. And then acted out on court like an a------."
Jackson said that he didn't think Payton would be a problem, but that it would be difficult to get minutes for Payton, Derek Fisher, Kareem Rush and Kobe Bryant.
"All these kids have egos," Jackson said. "But then I tell them that I have one, too."
Mon Mar 01, 2004 2:22 am
What Phil Jackson is saving Gary Payton for is not entirely clear, but after another 30-minute game Thursday night, this time in a two-point loss to the Sacramento Kings, Payton spent an hour venting to his agent, then called him again Friday morning.
Payton told Aaron Goodwin he longed to play his trademark aggressive game, but that in 56 games as a Laker he'd been boxed in by Jackson's rigid system, shortened playing time and the organization's unalterable reliance on Kobe Bryant and Shaquille O'Neal.
Goodwin said Friday there are moments when Payton "regrets" his decision to sign last summer with the Lakers, an organization Payton believed would adjust as much to his game as he would to it. Instead, Goodwin said, Payton has become a cog in the system, unable to affect games for long periods, if at all.
"That's just a point guard out there," Goodwin said. "That's not Gary Payton. Phil could use the old Gary Payton. It's frustrating, because he sacrificed to come to the Lakers…. At the end of the day, we've got to get together on this. The commitment that was made to Gary is not being fulfilled.
"Anybody who thinks Gary, at 35, has become an average point guard, they're wrong…. He's not being allowed to play his way and I know it hurts."
In the first nine minutes of the first quarter against the Kings, Payton made three of six shots for six points and took three rebounds. For the rest of the game, playing mostly in five-minutes bursts, he took four shots, missing three. He did not score in the second half, when he took three shots to Bryant's 17.
On Wednesday night in Denver, in the Laker possession that ended with Kareem Rush's game-winning three-pointer, Payton was so surprised Bryant gave up the ball that a pass nearly hit him in the face.
Jackson said he has asked Bryant to leave the ball in Payton's hands, to allow Payton to activate the offense, which occasionally happens.
"He's not happy," Goodwin said. "To be quite honest, he's tired of it. If they're not listening, it's crazy. All L.A. has seen is a shell of Gary Payton. He's gone out of his way to defer, and he's getting nothing back from Phil….
Mon Mar 01, 2004 3:07 am
Mon Mar 01, 2004 3:20 am
It's really unfair that Kobe can put up 20-something shots
Mon Mar 01, 2004 3:27 am
Mon Mar 01, 2004 3:46 am
k08e4mvp wrote:It's really unfair that Kobe can put up 20-something shots
It is fair because he is their best player. Payton should realize before he signed that he wouldnt be the first scoring option as he always has been, Kobe has been doing good things lately, plus LA is winning right now. I do understand that Payton is used to be the mainplayer on the team, but hes in a whole different situation right now, hes playing behind 2 players who simply better then him in the offense and need to get the ball. When Karl returns, I hope Gary will find hi srole again as he did in the start of the season, finding players and finish in the fast break
Mon Mar 01, 2004 8:27 am
Mon Mar 01, 2004 8:54 am
k08e4mvp wrote:It is fair because he is their best player.
Mon Mar 01, 2004 9:07 am
Psycho Jackal wrote:k08e4mvp wrote:It is fair because he is their best player.
Mon Mar 01, 2004 9:11 am
Mon Mar 01, 2004 9:47 am
Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:25 am
Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:45 am
k08e4mvp wrote:Let me put it this way now you are at it:
WHY KOBE IS THE BEST PLAYER ON THE LAKERS AND NOT SHAQ:
A) Shaq doesnt have the killerinstinct anymore like Steve Kerr said, Kobe has
B) Shaq never gets back on defense when he misses a shot and the ball ends up in the middle of a break. I dont see Kobe doing that
C) Kobe knows when to pass and when to attack, Shaq throws tons of hard hookshots when hes double teamed.
like it huh?![]()
Im not hating on Shaq at all (unlike you do on some player). All I say is that Kobe is the better player at this point.
If you want to go on about this, please do it over msn, that way I can share my toughts more specific in my language.
B) Shaq never gets back on defense when he misses a shot and the ball ends up in the middle of a break. I dont see Kobe doing that
Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:49 am
Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:54 am
Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:01 am
fgrep15 wrote:He needs to get on the tread mill, he should go work with Jeff Bzdelik (as his trainer) during the summer, get up in the high alititude, and get some conditioning going![]()
Maybe he's tired, who knows, I haven't really seen him doing it often so I dunno, maybe Phil will notice and talk to him.
Mon Mar 01, 2004 6:51 pm
WHY KOBE IS THE BEST PLAYER ON THE LAKERS AND NOT SHAQ:
Tue Mar 02, 2004 1:28 am
Tue Mar 02, 2004 2:39 am
Can Kobe win without Shaq? Some games, yes. Others...no.
I'm shocked no one has ever brought this up...
1999-2000: Kobe plays only 66 games, Shaq 79...Lakers 67-15, champions
2002-2003: Shaq plays only 67 games, Kobe 82...Lakers 50-32, eliminated in the second round.
Robby wrote:Kobe averages 1.35 points per field goal attempt.
Shaq averages 1.57 points per field goal attempt.
Now who should get the ball more if you want the team to win?
Matthew wrote:Does Kobe care about winning? Up until a point... imo. You put tmac in kobes position and you watch this laker team steamroll, becuase tracy would play off those great teamates.
Matthew wrote:One day, kobe will learn... but will it be too late? will he be in utah on a 7 year deal when he finally realises how much easier things were when he had shaq alongside him?
Question: Why does Kobe want a team of his own?
Answers:
A) So that he can win. (Oh, I didnt know he can't win with LA.)
B) Glory.
C) To get individual recognition, MVP etc. (yeah, it falls under glory.)
Tue Mar 02, 2004 9:25 am
Robby wrote:Here's the bottom line: Lakers won three championships with Shaq as the go to guy. Lakers lost last year with Kobe trying to be the go to guy. So which one is better?
Kobe averages 1.35 points per field goal attempt.
Shaq averages 1.57 points per field goal attempt.
Now who should get the ball more if you want the team to win?
One day, kobe will learn... but will it be too late? will he be in utah on a 7 year deal when he finally realises how much easier things were when he had shaq alongside him?
McGrady was also the one saying: I want my own team, I want to be their leader, I want individual achievements, what did it get him? How much more do we need to discuss this for it to get through?...Individual achievements are mighty nice and all folks, but if you dont win at the end of the night, what good is individual achievements? Unless, winning isn't as important as recognition is. In other words...the glory.
Tue Mar 02, 2004 9:35 am
Psycho Jackal wrote:[color=blue][i][b]McGrady was also the one saying: I want my own team, I want to be their leader, I want individual achievements, what did it get him? How much more do we need to discuss this for it to get through?...Individual achievements are mighty nice and all folks, but if you dont win at the end of the night, what good is individual achievements? Unless, winning isn't as important as recognition is. In other words...the glory.
Tue Mar 02, 2004 9:48 am