Also, aren't superstars supposed to step it up in the playoffs instead of just playing at the same pace?
If you compare his stats in the Detroit series with those of his regular season (32.1 PPG, 6.5 RPG, 5.5 APG, .457 fg%, .386 3PT%, .793 FT %) you can see that he clearly didn't step up during the playoffs. All of those numbers are down in the playoffs except for his rebounds.
yes, if you compare the numbers, it appears he 'did not step up'. but let me retort:
look at his first 2 games:
1)43pts, 7rebs, 3 asts, 53fg%.
2)46pts, 5 rebs, 1 asts, 61fg%
clearly monster games. and detroit was focusing much of its defense at him the rest of the series.
i'm not trying to make excuses for the guy. it just doesn't seem realistic to me to call someone overrated because his team couldn't get past the first round (let's remember orlando was seeded #8 and detroit did end up going to the conf finals).
also is it realistic to ask McGrady to average close to a triple double in the playoffs? this guy carried the team to the playoffs on a bad back. if anything, i think it would be more realistic to ask the other 11 guys to step up.
billups, wallace, & hamilton came up huge in piston victories and darrel armstrong virtually disappeared in them.
i think the magic lost that series because they couldn't contain billups&hamilton, detroit's defense got the stops when they needed to, and the role players on orlando didn't step up.
ugh tired now. McGrady overrated? fine go ahead and think so. i just don't agree
