amongst active talent, and based on what they have done in their entire career and their potential (to those applicable, meaning the newer generation of players), this is how (i think) the teams in the NBA would draft these players:
some factors i took account: injuries, team success, individual improvement, playoff success.
as well, when making my choices, i didn't take into account the developmental years -- you know, the first two or three years where players are still getting a feel of the game (ala kobe, mcgrady, jermaine o'neal, yada yada yada)
note: i'm not taking into account how well the supposed teams (the ones that are drafting) are going to mesh with these players. so if you're thinking duncan's game won't work with the the hypothetical #2 team in the atlanta hawks, you're probably right. but it's foolish to think how anyone in the NBA would not draft duncan, despite how many power forwards or centers their team may have.
first round:
#1 - Shaq
#2 - Duncan
#3 - Kidd
#4 - James
#5 - Bryant
#6 - Nowitzki
#7 - Garnett
#8 - Nash
#9 - Payton
#10 - Iverson
#11 - Wade
#12 - Carter
#13 - Billups
#14 - Jermaine O'Neal
#15 - Webber
#16 - R. Allen
#17 - Stoudemire
#18 - Bibby
#19 - C. Paul
#20 - D. Howard
#21 - Brand
#22 - Bosh
#23 - Marion
#24 - Arenas
#25 - Redd
#26 - R. Wallace
#27 - Pierce
#28 - Cassell
#29 - Hamilton
this is how i looked at it:
the obvious
shaq was pretty much a given at 1. when he was in his prime, which wasn't that long ago, he was just insane. yeah his free throw shooting was horrendous, but he made up for it on offense (career 58% from the field) and his defense. when he was slacking, he was still better than all the centers in the league. period.
duncan at #2 just for being consistent ever since he got drafted in 97. career 20, 10, 3 guy and has never missed the All-NBA first team and All-NBA defensive team if i'm not mistaken. three championships to boot too.
kidd at #3 - nets in 00-01: 26-56. nets in 01-02: 52-30. kidd averaged a triple double in the eastern conference finals. appearance in the nba finals.
enough said.
james at #4 - what he did in his rookie season, sophomore season, and this season is just remarkable. pretty much exemplifies the term versatility. he can blow past guards, and even overpower some power forwards. i can't wait to see what he has in store in coming years.
bryant at #5 - a juggernaut on the offensive end, and pretty good in the defensive end as well. his shot selection can be questionable at times, and he's been known to alienate his teammates. regardless though not picking him in the top 10 is just silly.
this is personally how i think the teams should draft these players. how would you structure the draft? you don't have to use the players that i used. as well, when picking your top 5, explain why you think they should go in that order. [/b]