Sun Jun 26, 2005 11:43 am
I agree co-MVP would have been better. Duncan however is the leader of the team and his team reflects on how he plays. I just think Manu should have gotten it, and its not like Duncan has never gotten this award before
Sun Jun 26, 2005 3:30 pm
yah, if we're just talking about leadership, then ben had to win it last year, but he didn't. maybe it's also because of tim's better stats. i don't think there had ever been co-mvp's before...
Sun Jun 26, 2005 3:57 pm
i hate it when people say so and so should get the mvp because they are the best player. thats bullshit. whoever plays the best should get the mvp. also saying that manu would not do as good without duncan is fucking stupid. who cares, duncan played so its all a pointless arguement. oh and guess what, without manu duncan would not be winning the mvp either cause detroit would have taken that series easily.
Sun Jun 26, 2005 4:35 pm
Sauru wrote:i hate it when people say so and so should get the mvp because they are the best player. thats bullshit. whoever plays the best should get the mvp. also saying that manu would not do as good without duncan is fucking stupid. who cares, duncan played so its all a pointless arguement. oh and guess what, without manu duncan would not be winning the mvp either cause detroit would have taken that series easily.
Great post
