Sun Feb 13, 2005 2:43 pm
on nba.com, isiah listed at 6'1" aint he? iversons at 6'0".
Sun Feb 13, 2005 3:53 pm
I don't know what all of you think, but in my opinion Iverson only did 60 points to find himself first in the 2004-05 records book for most points. He just couldn't bear that J. O'Neal topped him by only one point (55) to have the season best. But anyway, 60 points are really impressive!
Sun Feb 13, 2005 3:55 pm
ONYX wrote:I don't know what all of you think, but in my opinion Iverson only did 60 points to find himself first in the 2004-05 records book for most points. He just couldn't bear that J. O'Neal topped him by only one point (55) to have the season best. But anyway, 60 points are really impressive!
now watch jermaine score 61
then iverson will bust off for 147
his postgame interview will be like id like to see you get 148 jermaine!
Sun Feb 13, 2005 4:05 pm
IndyPacers67 wrote:now watch jermaine score 61
then iverson will bust off for 147
his postgame interview will be like id like to see you get 148 jermaine!
I'm looking forward to Philly against Indiana... that will be a fight! But not only concerning points...
Sun Feb 13, 2005 4:19 pm
Stoudamire score 50 points too, he's 5'11!!!
anyways, 60 =
Go AI
anyways, 60 =
Go AI
Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:20 pm
Damon is more like 5'9'' or 5'10''
Unless he had one of those early-thirties growth spurts that are so common.
I watched the last couple minutes of that game and was pylling for Ivey to get it.
Unless he had one of those early-thirties growth spurts that are so common.
I watched the last couple minutes of that game and was pylling for Ivey to get it.
Sun Feb 13, 2005 7:23 pm
60 Points !?!?
Damn
Damn
Sun Feb 13, 2005 7:29 pm
Sit wrote:Isiahs like 6'2" Iverson is 5'11"
What the fuck?!
Damon is 5'10"
Isaih is 5'11"
Iverson is 6" (He can dunk)
What the hell Sit, I thought you knew better.
Sun Feb 13, 2005 7:49 pm
soory bro! lol... i've been reading bout MJ, Kobe and yao for too long!
Mon Feb 14, 2005 12:07 am
that was a great performance. AIs still a top 10 player.
but rite now i just want Philly to be above 50%...
but rite now i just want Philly to be above 50%...
Mon Feb 14, 2005 12:22 am
Vinsanity over 40 three times in a row,AI 60...O yeah,old school is back!This remaind to taht game 4 or 5 seasons ago,76ers-Raptors in playoff....Those were the days...
Mon Feb 14, 2005 12:23 am
lots of guys could score 60 if they took 36 friggin shots.
He's a PG though. Someone like Shaq would be expected to shoot that good. It's harder for guys Iversons size because the quality shots they get aren't going to be as good.
On NBA Fastbreak they showed his shot display and he hit from everywhere on the court. And 47's a good shooting percentage for a PG,
Mon Feb 14, 2005 3:30 am
you know i think VC had a chance at 60 if it wasn't for bowen.
Mon Feb 14, 2005 4:55 am
^Yea, he probably did, he should've ignored the Bowen attack if that's possible..
Mon Feb 14, 2005 5:06 am
Amphatoast wrote:you know i think VC had a chance at 60 if it wasn't for bowen.
Well, he had 43 entering the 4th, so he would need another 17 to get 60, so I doubt the Spurs would allow that much in crunch time, since they're one of the best defensive team in the league.
Mon Feb 14, 2005 7:50 am
Looks like anoither lengthy debate comming up Fgrep. If Iverson isnt a top 20 player in your opinion, who would put ahead of him?
Mon Feb 14, 2005 9:31 am
What are you talking about? I said that what people started saying after he got injured, look at the Top 50 list and see where I ranked him 
What, do you think Chris Webber can't play anymore, and Grant Hill is just a role player too
It's funny though that many said he wasn't a top 20 player anymore, I know I felt he wasn't a top 10 player anymore after last season, but he's defintely making a case for himself.
Please read this again, thanks...
What, do you think Chris Webber can't play anymore, and Grant Hill is just a role player too
It's funny though that many said he wasn't a top 20 player anymore, I know I felt he wasn't a top 10 player anymore after last season, but he's defintely making a case for himself.
Injuries sure can do a lot of things:
Iverson not a top 20 player anymore
Grant Hill will be at most a role player coming back [though his was more justified]
Webber won't be able to produce anymore
Jason Kidd won't be able to maintain the high level and be able to carry a team
.... I guess it's Jamal "I'm basically retired" Mashburn's turn to show everyone
Please read this again, thanks...
Mon Feb 14, 2005 11:21 am
My apologies, I definately misread that. I agree with what your saying now that i have read it properly, people get an idea about a player, and they hold onto that theory for as long as they can. Its not just limited to injuries, heres a few:
Barkley didnt work hard
Jordan was a bad teamate
Patrick Ewing never hit big shots
Karl Malone was a choker
Barkley didnt work hard
Jordan was a bad teamate
Patrick Ewing never hit big shots
Karl Malone was a choker
Tue Feb 15, 2005 1:13 am
^
S'all good, Vince was also supposed to never average 25+ PPG again.
S'all good, Vince was also supposed to never average 25+ PPG again.
Tue Feb 15, 2005 4:25 am
anyone remember Kobe taking 47 shots....i think he missed his last 11 or so....only managed 40 points or so.
Tue Feb 15, 2005 11:55 am
Yeah against boston when shaq was injrued...
Tue Feb 15, 2005 3:33 pm
Matt wrote:anyone remember Kobe taking 47 shots....i think he missed his last 11 or so....only managed 40 points or so.
yeah, i was watching the entire gasme. sad thing is the celts barely won that game.
and holy shit i was like "WTF KOBE! STOP SHOOTING!"
he ended the game 20-47 managed 46/47 points