I liked Vancouver Grizzlies because they tried the crap to get that one more W. They were naturally a loser, an honorable tanker despite management's tries. The Knicks may not have been good in recent years but they at least they had intention to get beefier.
Andrew wrote:How would everyone rate the Mavericks' offseason? I'm inclined to put them in the "didn't improve" category, despite a couple of solid (and potentially solid) additions. Granted, Monta Ellis isn't the most efficient scorer, nor an elite two way player, but he's still capable of putting points up on the board. They also lost Tyson Chandler, and ended up missing out on DeAndre Jordan. Do the additions of a capable (but seemingly rapidly declining) Deron Williams, a recovering-from-injury Wes Matthews, and JaVale McGee (not untalented, but questionable basketball IQ, and still less of a player than he could be) balance out those departures, or in Jordan's case, make up for what could have been?
Yeah, me too. I'm inclined to put them in Not Improved as well. Departure of Monta is addition by subtraction, so it should actually help the team with Parsons, Dirk getting extra touches (Matthews is good too). But loss of Tyson leaves too big of a hole in the paint which is just about unrecoverable with what they have at the moment. Imagine if they didn't trade for Rondo and kept Wright.