No. 1 Picks: Rookie Performances

Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.

No. 1 Picks: Rookie Performances

Postby beau_boy04 on Sat Jun 11, 2005 5:38 pm

Here's the link:

http://www.nba.com/history/stats_top_picks.html

I think David Robinson and Tim Duncan have been the most impressive!

What do you guys think?
User avatar
beau_boy04
 
Posts: 1310
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 9:56 am

Postby J@3 on Sat Jun 11, 2005 5:43 pm

Robinson, Shaq, Brand but I think the most impressive was James... just because of his age really.
User avatar
J@3
 
Posts: 19815
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 3:25 pm
Location: MLB

Postby Jackal_ on Sat Jun 11, 2005 6:58 pm

I agree with James. He came into the league with more hype than ever and lived up to his expectations. Now the load is slowly going to be coming off his shoulders, he has many years to go but sure did show up a lot of people. (Y)
Preparation will only take you so far. After that you've got to take a few leaps of faith.
User avatar
Jackal_
 
Posts: 2198
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 7:45 pm
Location: Where indians go to sleep

Postby J@3 on Sat Jun 11, 2005 8:25 pm

The hype alone could've crushed him but he's handled it well... one of the only young superstars I actually like... that being said I told everyone and anyone he'd be a bust based on the 1 time I saw him play in high school.
User avatar
J@3
 
Posts: 19815
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 3:25 pm
Location: MLB

Postby maes on Sun Jun 12, 2005 3:35 am

He wasn't a #1 pick but what about Pau Gasol.

PPG: 17.6
RPG: 8.9
FG%: .518
APG: 2.7

SPG: .50
BPG: 2.06


(Y)
“Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships.”
#23
maes
 
Posts: 1587
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 9:58 am
Location: Chicago

Postby Strike Freedom on Sun Jun 12, 2005 7:35 am

i thought Larry Johnson was pretty impressive too.. in his first few years..
User avatar
Strike Freedom
 
Posts: 589
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:26 am

Postby Hopsing on Sun Jun 12, 2005 8:35 am

In terms of making their teams better Duncan and Robinson are the runner-ups. Looking at the pure stats, u gotta add Iverson and Shaq.
Hopsing
 
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2003 7:09 pm

Postby Andrew on Sun Jun 12, 2005 1:23 pm

The improvement the Spurs showed in Duncan's rookie year are a bit deceptive when looking at the numbers alone. After all, the Spurs were missing their two key players for most of the 1997 season. That said, he's still one of the best rookies picked first overall since the lottery was implemented. I'd say Duncan, Robinson, Iverson and James have been the best rookie year performers at the number one pick from 1985 onwards.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115118
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Drex on Sun Jun 12, 2005 2:37 pm

What about the Kandi Man? :lol:
Image
User avatar
Drex
You bastards!!!
 
Posts: 6074
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 10:48 am
Location: Iquique, Chile

Postby Bang on Sun Jun 12, 2005 3:01 pm

What about Kwame, then?
Bored.
User avatar
Bang
 
Posts: 1312
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 11:16 pm

Postby J@3 on Sun Jun 12, 2005 4:20 pm

Drex wrote:What about the Kandi Man? :lol:


They actually got worse after they picked him :lol: :lol:
User avatar
J@3
 
Posts: 19815
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 3:25 pm
Location: MLB

Postby beau_boy04 on Sun Jun 12, 2005 6:42 pm

bangyounh wrote:What about Kwame, then?


Don't even mention his name! he should have gone 200 pick overall instead of 1st pick overall
User avatar
beau_boy04
 
Posts: 1310
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 9:56 am

Postby Hopsing on Sun Jun 12, 2005 7:15 pm

Clippers didnt get worse, I misinterpreted this at first too, it was the lockout season, they got even slightly better ( a tiny little bit).
Hopsing
 
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2003 7:09 pm

Postby J@3 on Sun Jun 12, 2005 7:25 pm

Ah I didn't realize that.
User avatar
J@3
 
Posts: 19815
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 3:25 pm
Location: MLB

Postby Drex on Mon Jun 13, 2005 2:45 am

I did look at that, but it was funny to look at the records and see they won less than the year before.
Image
User avatar
Drex
You bastards!!!
 
Posts: 6074
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 10:48 am
Location: Iquique, Chile

Postby FendeR` on Mon Jun 13, 2005 6:48 am

I have to agree with Andrew as far as Robinson, Duncan, James and Iverson, but if I had to pick one I'd pick James. How young he is, how much hype he had, and how much he was forced to (by the lack of hustle by the Cavs) carry his team makes him the best.
FendeR` - Captain
Image
User avatar
FendeR`
 
Posts: 1763
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 2:50 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Postby ManuGinobili!!! on Thu Jun 16, 2005 5:46 am

Andrew wrote:The improvement the Spurs showed in Duncan's rookie year are a bit deceptive when looking at the numbers alone. After all, the Spurs were missing their two key players for most of the 1997 season. That said, he's still one of the best rookies picked first overall since the lottery was implemented. I'd say Duncan, Robinson, Iverson and James have been the best rookie year performers at the number one pick from 1985 onwards.


The same can be said about David Robinson. SA added Maurice Cheeks, Terry Cummings, and the #3 overall pick, Sean Elliott to David's rookie team.
User avatar
ManuGinobili!!!
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 9:02 am

Postby Sauru on Thu Jun 16, 2005 9:50 am

i would have to say that david robinson is without a doubt the best on that list with shaq following in second. robinson got the most blocks and points out of anyone and is second in rebounds to shaq. not only that but his team went from 21 to 56 wins. so yeah he is clearly the best of that bunch.
User avatar
Sauru
 
Posts: 7726
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 11:01 am

Postby Andrew on Thu Jun 16, 2005 2:58 pm

ManuGinobili!!! wrote:The same can be said about David Robinson. SA added Maurice Cheeks, Terry Cummings, and the #3 overall pick, Sean Elliott to David's rookie team.


Indeed, though I still consider both to be among the best rookie performers after being taken first overall.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115118
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Postby ManuGinobili!!! on Fri Jun 17, 2005 7:20 am

I agree Andrew, especially David Robinson. These guys (especially big men) that come into the league need a few years to develop now, but David came into the league completely dominating. He was better than Tim Duncan as a rookie.

This is coming from someone from SA and I had season tickets Duncan's rookie year.
User avatar
ManuGinobili!!!
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 9:02 am

Postby cyanide on Fri Jun 17, 2005 8:45 am

If he was on the list, Larry Bird would've been impressive too.

Shaq, David, Duncan (though he got David back and healthy), and even Webber are all impressive, but I don't think Kwame had anything to do with Washington's improved record when he joined :)
if you were killed tomorrow, i WOULDNT GO 2 UR FUNERAL CUZ ID B N JAIL 4 KILLIN THE MOTHA FUCKER THAT KILLED U!
......|..___________________, ,
....../ `---______----|]
...../==o;;;;;;;;______.:/
.....), ---.(_(__) /
....// (..) ), ----"
...//___//
..//___//
.//___//
WE TRUE HOMIES
WE RIDE TOGETHER
WE DIE TOGETHER
User avatar
cyanide
Dat steatopygous
 
Posts: 9197
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 6:09 am
Location: US's toque

Postby Andrew on Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:33 pm

Not sure what you mean about Bird, he was the sixth pick in 1978.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115118
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia


Return to NBA & Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 4 guests