che wrote:ohhhhhhhh I'm soooo looking forward to trying this out!
che wrote:(Y)
Maybe you also forgot your own? Klay Thompson for example has his old one with K.Love Form instead of newer one with Nash Form.
Also I noticed some curious things like in the AllTimeRosters Curry has 99 for off/def REB and Klay has 90 for both. In the Elite Rosters both Draymonds have like 46 for passing. Can't be right.
Current season Curry has 54 or so 3PT attribute.
che wrote:Didn't Curry play like 5-10 games this season? Is that a useful sample size to base attributes off of? Did youdo the same thing for Kawhi in '18 when he only played 9 games coming back from injury? Maybe in such cases it's better to use the stats from the year before?
I mean teams still guarded Curry like the 3pt threat he always was and Warriors' offense improved significantly when he was on the court this season iirc. Is it realistic that he can't make a three in game (which is the case with 54)?
In the end it shouldn't matter much, who's gonna play with the '20 Warriors anyway?
My bad on Green.
Btw. slimm, I always wondered why Hakeem's speed & quickness were rated around 60 when he's known as this really quick & agile big man.
And also bigs from 60's (and maybe 70's don't remember) have really high rebound values. Many players with 99/99 which means a Dennis Rodman with his 6'7 frame becomes kinda useless in Elite/Alltime rosters compared to these guys (when there's an in depth study detailing he was actually better than Wilt & Russell). I get that FG% was much lower and pace was MUCH higher in those days so there were a lot more rebounds available but does it make sense to you? Basing REB attributes off of Reb% (% of available misses rebounded) would be too much work I'd guess?
Again thanks for all the hard work put in, both of you!
che wrote:Didn't Curry play like 5-10 games this season? Is that a useful sample size to base attributes off of? Did youdo the same thing for Kawhi in '18 when he only played 9 games coming back from injury? Maybe in such cases it's better to use the stats from the year before?
I mean teams still guarded Curry like the 3pt threat he always was and Warriors' offense improved significantly when he was on the court this season iirc. Is it realistic that he can't make a three in game (which is the case with 54)?
In the end it shouldn't matter much, who's gonna play with the '20 Warriors anyway?
My bad on Green.
Btw. slimm, I always wondered why Hakeem's speed & quickness were rated around 60 when he's known as this really quick & agile big man.
And also bigs from 60's (and maybe 70's don't remember) have really high rebound values. Many players with 99/99 which means a Dennis Rodman with his 6'7 frame becomes kinda useless in Elite/Alltime rosters compared to these guys (when there's an in depth study detailing he was actually better than Wilt & Russell). I get that FG% was much lower and pace was MUCH higher in those days so there were a lot more rebounds available but does it make sense to you? Basing REB attributes off of Reb% (% of available misses rebounded) would be too much work I'd guess?
Again thanks for all the hard work put in, both of you!
che wrote:@sko & slimm: thanks for the explanations!
I played a few games with the elite roster and the new dribbling tendencies are really noticable, CPU drives to the rim with more competence.
One other thing I really like is the increased strip probability in the paint. It's more dangerous to dribble or even hold onto the ball down there now for both sides.
I wanna share two sig shots which seem perfect to me
Steph Curry F:15 B:26
Kawhi F:23 B:Allen
edit:
Oh and @slimm: I noticed you gave the Cutter Play Type to lots of bigs like '11 Tyson Chandler for example. Is there any specific gameplay reason for that?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests