
gamez wrote:Is better to know the flaws of using Texmod, and this is how Texmod works: it doesn't replace any of the games files, instead it loads new textures from the tpf files in place of/ on top of the original textures, and this is very bad for resources. If a mod is very large it can take TexMod a very long time to load the game, this is because it's based off of definition files which tell the program what textures will be loaded in place of the original textures and load them all before the game starts. This can cause upwards of 15 minutes of loading if you have some insanely large textures. Also, depending on the game engine, this can push the game past 2 gigs of RAM usage which can cause crashes.
If people is having performance problem using photomods just think what would happen using Texmod, and don't forget that Texmod produces some graphical glitches (at least they are temporary, but there isn't a way to avoid this random glitches).
julsnice wrote:Yeah no doubt, thanks for the info. I'm not saying don't ask if there are any glitches with this or any mod.
My statement was directed to those that see a good graphical mod, and then complain/question how the mod will affect their framerate, primarily. And there are a lot of folks who do this all the time.
Just a simple rule of thumb: EXPECT TO SEE LOWERED PERFORMANCE WHEN APPLYING GRAPHICAL MODS TO GAMES
Does it happen all the time? Of course not, but since modders take games past the point of the developer's intention then it's most likely the outcome with the better graphical mods.
Like the saying goes, if it's too good to be true, it usually is. I can't have SSAO, FXAA and high quality ENB added to my game without seeing a drop of some kind, and that's because of my PC setup. Others may be able to, but it's because their system is powerful.
I'm EXPECTING that doing something like modding all players CF textures and portrait pics to HD using TexMod will have some sort of affect on performance (whether it be framerate or loading times), I would be a fool not to.
But lets hope somehow the game can handle it.
Maybe if R4ZOR (or anybody else) could get TexMod to REPLACE the textures in the .iff files (i.e. preventing the game from loading both SD and HD textures and instead just have it load the HD only) then that should help diminish any performance hits
gamez wrote:Texmod was used back in NBA 2K9, why it haven't been used in 4 years? I will tell you: because people hate this way of patching, just look the post in 2K9, and look how people asked for iff patching instead of Texmod. And I will tell you why I said in this thread that "R4zoR's big secret" was that he was using Texmod: because he was creating so much hype that a lot of people would be very disappointed after seeing what his 'revolutionar HD method' was. Just read post about Texmod in NBA 2K9 section, and you will see how people hated that program.
It's much better modding game files (and 2K modders have iff editors) than using external programs that intercepts texture calls on a DirectX level, it's just an efficiency thing, and other thing very important that should be really important as a rule of thumb for patchers: Patches should be easy to use for a patcher to install, or also someone who isn't good with computers. I know a lot of people would have problems with Texmod patches, that's why I said R4zoR that Texmod isn't the best way to go. I thing it's best to double the resoultion of iff files, it wouldn't cause glitches, system problems and performance hits like Texmod, and it would be easier to use for the occasional patcher.
But, as I said, R4zoR can do what he wants, I am just saying what will happen: people won't enjoy patching with Texmod.
R4zoR wrote:Do you always have to bitch around for me using texmod? All mighty specialist. Man find a way how to hack in and make those resolutions into those iff files, it will take you a long ass time to do so, even if you do, it will be more bugged than it is with texmod. As i'm saying don't tell me that everyone hates this program, just because you had some problems with it, doesn't mean it will be the same for all the people. And i'm doing this just for my own fun, it doesn't mean, that everyone needs to do download it.
JMaster12 wrote:Razor is my good friend and it pains me to see people hate on what he has done. Texmod is a great program maybe if you upgraded your Windows 2001 PC than you will realize it. I have a 250 dollar build for my pc and i have upgraded alot of faces with this program and i haven't had 1 fps loss. if you don't wanna use then stick with the smaller resolutions that 2k gives you. PS: you have no life if you went all the way back to 2009 forums just to find information to bash someone else s work
dbzx wrote:hmm so can texmod be used with the KeepMyMod tool by Leftos? just a thought..no big deal if it cant
gamez wrote:If you read my post that way I didn't have more to say. You will see what happens, I'm only reminding what happened with NBA 2K9 and, by the way, I didn't had any problem whit this program becasue I avoided to use it, I'm not speaking about myself when I said that people would hate Texmod.
I don't need to check 2K9 forums because I have good memory, I remember what happened with NBA 2K9.
I don't want to talk with childs, so, goodbye, I will only say that i didn't hate R4zoR's work.
chicagoRAW wrote:What I'm seeing is a whole buncha something over nothing. What else is new.
iamLillard wrote:R4zoR - I think the floor file is rocking now![]()
![]()
![]()
the only thing u need to do is SHARE! we love U!
oflii143 wrote:default credit to amarowade
dbzx wrote:hmm so can texmod be used with the KeepMyMod tool by Leftos..and does this work with the steam nba2k13.exe? just a thought..no big deal if it cant
wody wrote:look.I dont care what type of program you using...texmod whatever...you made this game look awesomecant wait to try it,the point here is have a better experience of the game...everything that makes it better it has to be welcome,if somebody dont like it just dont use it
buddaking wrote:great work. can i use gimp to make the tattoo's or cyberfaces in full HD?
dbzx wrote:Oh and for chicagoRaw's comment, i think he was refering to the "drama" -> alot of something over nothing. Well thats what i thought he was saying...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests