What I Don't Want To See In 07
Mon Sep 11, 2006 4:38 pm
as you can see from these screenshots, after a few years the rosters on some teams just became unrealistic. Teams just kept on draftin the best players it seems.
EA should implement a compulsory system just like in the All-Star game
2 x G
2 x F
1 x C
2 x X
Otherwise, if you get a starter in foul trouble, the other team might have to send in a SG @ C. Which leads me to the point that, if that happens, players need to switch positions. Naturally the SF & PF would go up a spot
EA should implement a compulsory system just like in the All-Star game
2 x G
2 x F
1 x C
2 x X
Otherwise, if you get a starter in foul trouble, the other team might have to send in a SG @ C. Which leads me to the point that, if that happens, players need to switch positions. Naturally the SF & PF would go up a spot
Mon Sep 11, 2006 4:59 pm
lol @ the 3rd picture!!!!!!
6'7'' 255lbs is more like a football defensive end's body than a basketball shooting guard's body. at least he isn't 6'1' or below... like 80% of the SG's in my dynasties :S
6'7'' 255lbs is more like a football defensive end's body than a basketball shooting guard's body. at least he isn't 6'1' or below... like 80% of the SG's in my dynasties :S
Mon Sep 11, 2006 5:42 pm
haha, i never actually noticed that.
Mt team has a 6'7 248lb PG.....quite mobile. One of the better generated rookies i must say.
Mt team has a 6'7 248lb PG.....quite mobile. One of the better generated rookies i must say.
Mon Sep 11, 2006 7:34 pm
2k6 has a pretty decent subbing system where players slide to secondary positions....for example, take that Blazers roster....imagine undersized SG D. Hughson gets subbed on for Przybilla or whoever is starting at C....Hughson would go to SG, Webster would slide to SF, SF would slide to PF & PF would slide to C....in that roster's case, the big men would play huge minutes & get real fatigued....I haven't noticed any clogging up of positions as much as Live either....
Mon Sep 11, 2006 10:01 pm
Yeah. 2k6 also has this feature were the center guarding the pointguard. Wow.
Mon Sep 11, 2006 11:02 pm
What I don't want to see:
The cover, the box, sitting on my desk.
The CD in my PC CD Tray.
Jokes of course. But yeah, the position overloading got quite annoying.
The cover, the box, sitting on my desk.
The CD in my PC CD Tray.
Jokes of course. But yeah, the position overloading got quite annoying.
Tue Sep 12, 2006 8:40 pm
i also noticed a lack of realistic guards... on my roster i had a 6'2 250lb shooting guard with 96 and 91 ratings for FG and 3PT... but then id hav another shooting guard who is 6'8 and 190lbs, with 45 FG and 28 3PT
stupid
stupid
Tue Sep 12, 2006 9:28 pm
also noticed a lack of realistic guards... on my roster i had a 6'2 250lb shooting guard with 96 and 91 ratings for FG and 3PT...
Must be from New Zealand.
Tue Sep 12, 2006 9:46 pm
Jugs wrote:also noticed a lack of realistic guards... on my roster i had a 6'2 250lb shooting guard with 96 and 91 ratings for FG and 3PT...
Must be from New Zealand.
come on, I'm not that heavy
Wed Sep 13, 2006 2:03 am
one thing i dont want to see in it: nba live 06
though its pretty obvious it will be there, the game could also be smarter on the roster thing like said.. also smarter on trades
though its pretty obvious it will be there, the game could also be smarter on the roster thing like said.. also smarter on trades
Last edited by felix8621 on Fri Sep 15, 2006 2:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
Wed Sep 13, 2006 8:04 pm
i think one of the things they focused on was the trading AI... now you can actually trade a pick