Dee4Three wrote:Graphics: 5 (No large heads, better lighting)
Gameplay: 3 (Can't fully get over the input lag, robotic movements)
Presentation: 7
Depth: 3 (Added WNBA, later added basic roster editing, but still no multi-user Dynasty, no classic players in regular roster)
Ethics: 7
Overall: 5.0
I tried to change my vote (I put in a 4.0). But either way, It's a step in the right direction for Live.
I grade hard.....
ThaLiveKing wrote:Dee4Three wrote:Graphics: 5 (No large heads, better lighting)
Gameplay: 3 (Can't fully get over the input lag, robotic movements)
Presentation: 7
Depth: 3 (Added WNBA, later added basic roster editing, but still no multi-user Dynasty, no classic players in regular roster)
Ethics: 7
Overall: 5.0
I tried to change my vote (I put in a 4.0). But either way, It's a step in the right direction for Live.
I grade hard.....
Game play a 3??? LOL....Man you're straight trolling
ThaLiveKing wrote:Still, no way game play is a 3/10
benji wrote:LeBron is such a choker. And people were talking about him as an all-time great. As having possibly surpassed Kobe. What a joke.
velvet bliss wrote:Andrew, you the real MVP.
Andrew wrote:He who flops and flails to the Finals and a title, flops and flails best.
Dee4Three wrote:I get this comment quite a bit, and it's very telling.
"Isn't Live ass?" Or "isn't Live garbage".
Because if you think about that question, it means that the people who are asking it literally are going by what they are hearing, or by what they see in a comment section, or what a friend may have told them. It's based ZERO on actual hands on experience. It's basically like not trying a food because someone said they didn't like it, how do you know you won't just because they don't like it? Do we all have the same taste buds?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests