Sun Oct 19, 2014 1:03 am
Sun Oct 19, 2014 1:10 am
Sun Oct 19, 2014 1:16 am
KevinParker13 wrote:What do you mean by the physical effect?
Sun Oct 19, 2014 1:33 am
Sun Oct 19, 2014 1:49 am
KevinParker13 wrote:You sure you're not playing on medium settings?
Sun Oct 19, 2014 2:26 am
Sun Oct 19, 2014 2:28 am
Genius.Nightfly67 wrote:There weren't any physics back then...
Sun Oct 19, 2014 2:45 am
Nightfly67 wrote:There weren't any physics back then...
Sun Oct 19, 2014 3:18 am
Sun Oct 19, 2014 3:23 am
Dommy73 wrote:Nightfly67 wrote:There weren't any physics back then...
And right when I was thinking that nothing is gonna surprise me today, you came along with THAT.
Sun Oct 19, 2014 4:09 am
Sun Oct 19, 2014 4:21 am
ChrisCP3Paul wrote:What he meant by no physics back then, was in real life in the 80's and 90's all the shorts and all the jerseys were so tight on players they were immovable so thus 2K made them with no physics to reflect real life...
that's what you meant, right right
Sun Oct 19, 2014 6:45 am
Sun Oct 19, 2014 6:59 am
Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:19 am
Nightfly67 wrote:Dommy73 wrote:Nightfly67 wrote:There weren't any physics back then...
And right when I was thinking that nothing is gonna surprise me today, you came along with THAT.
Was it a good surprise, or a bad surprise? I hope good, that means it was at least a little bit funny.
Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:56 am
eric800223 wrote:The graphic looks terrible when I play classic teams
You can tell the difference easily
Sun Oct 19, 2014 8:13 am
Dommy73 wrote:Nightfly67 wrote:Dommy73 wrote:Nightfly67 wrote:There weren't any physics back then...
And right when I was thinking that nothing is gonna surprise me today, you came along with THAT.
Was it a good surprise, or a bad surprise? I hope good, that means it was at least a little bit funny.
Good surprise, because nobody could mean this serisously
Sun Oct 19, 2014 9:11 am
Sun Oct 19, 2014 9:20 am
Sun Oct 19, 2014 9:48 am
Phreak50 wrote:I agree with the OP. Many classic player faces are worse this year too. Easiest one to check is Allen Iverson. Seemed to have some sort of (old tech) scan in 2K14 next gen but in 15 has gone back to the Dreamcast face.
Sun Oct 19, 2014 3:18 pm
skoadam wrote:I understand 80's and early 90's but damn it, 98 lakers or chicago? cmon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMj2E8L7JoY
Sun Oct 19, 2014 8:27 pm
TBM wrote:Phreak50 wrote:I agree with the OP. Many classic player faces are worse this year too. Easiest one to check is Allen Iverson. Seemed to have some sort of (old tech) scan in 2K14 next gen but in 15 has gone back to the Dreamcast face.
Your trolling is getting annoying.
Sun Oct 19, 2014 8:30 pm
Or you know, growing up and realizing that there's no such thing as a perfect game or a perfect developer?Phreak50 wrote:TBM wrote:Phreak50 wrote:I agree with the OP. Many classic player faces are worse this year too. Easiest one to check is Allen Iverson. Seemed to have some sort of (old tech) scan in 2K14 next gen but in 15 has gone back to the Dreamcast face.
Your trolling is getting annoying.
No what is getting annoying is the fanboyism, either being blind or refusing to accept their almighty game has flaws.
Wed Oct 22, 2014 12:46 pm
Thu Oct 23, 2014 4:04 am
Phreak50 wrote:TBM wrote:Phreak50 wrote:I agree with the OP. Many classic player faces are worse this year too. Easiest one to check is Allen Iverson. Seemed to have some sort of (old tech) scan in 2K14 next gen but in 15 has gone back to the Dreamcast face.
Your trolling is getting annoying.
No what is getting annoying is the fanboyism, either being blind or refusing to accept their almighty game has flaws.
15/14
[ Image ]