Is commentary better in 2003 than in 2001
Mon Dec 23, 2002 10:40 pm
Is commentary better in 2003 than in 2001
Tue Dec 24, 2002 12:13 am
Yeah, i think so.
You seem to be asking a lot of questions about Live '03...why not ask them in one post? Can't you wait untill Christmas day?...
You seem to be asking a lot of questions about Live '03...why not ask them in one post? Can't you wait untill Christmas day?...
Tue Dec 24, 2002 11:31 am
I'd have to say yes for this.
Tue Dec 24, 2002 1:00 pm
I like 2003 commentry better than 2001,, but there are still lots of mistakes made.
Tue Dec 24, 2002 2:39 pm
I'll join everyone who's saying it's better. Commentary in a video game gets repetitive after a while and there are errors (comments about Michael Jordan leading the league in triple doubles year after year), but 2003's commentary is an improvement over both Live 2001 and Live 2002. Don Poier and Bob Elliott actually talk to each other sometimes, instead of Poier making a comment, Elliott responding, followed by silence. IMHO, they also better react to the game. Now, if only they'd stop declaring the game over when there's a 20 point deficit with two minutes left, only to start talking about how the losing team can win it from there... 