shadowgrin wrote:Fucking Joe. Half of the album:
This video is not available in your country due to copyright restrictions.
Hey, it's not my fault you live in freaking Pinoy-land. Usually if any kind of online content is available in Europe, it's available everywhere.
Anyway, here's the download link if any of you are having trouble with YouTube.
- Code: Select all
http://www.med!afire.com/?0dixmxj2zjt
what's odd? i love every single track on nevermind. Nirvana knows who they are. Not every song is epic, but every song is undeniably them and it works as an album. This album just wasnt a cohesive effort.
Nirvana knows who they are? Nirvana changed their style according to Cobain's mood, for Christ's sake! It's the reason Everman left after just a few months, it's the reason Nirvana had like 254 drummers before settling on Grohl in 1990, and it's the reason Grohl went solo in '93.
Have you ever listened to Bleach or Incesticide? Those albums sound nothing like Nevermind or In Utero. And what's a song like Polly doing on Nevermind?
Also, despite being a big Nirvana fan, I agree with Jae: half of Nevermind is filler. I had never heard any song on Nevermind except for Smells Like Teen Spirit, Come as You Are and Lithium until I got the CD. Even In Bloom and Polly, which were released as singles, were completely unknown to me. But the whole grunge movement never really made it to Europe so that may have something to do with it, who knows.
Also, I've always though In Utero was much better than Nevermind, which sounds just like any other band trying to achieve commercial success.
Pearl Jam and Nirvana were the only "great" bands to come out of the grunge era. Then there were mediocre followers Live
1. Nirvana never "came out" of the grunge era. They never had a chance to.
2. Pearl Jam hasn't released a decent album since Vitalogy and No Code in the mid-90s. And their best work remain their two grunge albums Ten and Vs. Also, just for the fact that they changed their music style from grunge to alternative because their label and the market asked them to, they shouldn't be considered a "great" band. I consider them to be nothing but mercenaries. And the fact that they had the nerve to cover The Who's Reign O'er Me, with an awful effort to say the least, makes me hate them even more.
3. Live isn't a "follower." They are not a grunge band and they never were. Post-grunge is a very different genre from grunge. In fact their main influences aren't grunge bands.
...but skipping around Live, why did some people tell me this was grunge? It sounds like Matchbox 20 (not matchbox twenty) although I no longer can recognize genre distinctions it seems.
Again, Live was never grunge. Their breakthrough was 1994, grunge was dead by then. And it sounds like Matchbox 20 because both of them are post-grunge.
Anyway, I can't seem to understand if, according to the new rules, I should review my own recommendation.