Home
Downloads
Wiki

Sit's Rockets Dynasty - UPDATES GALORE

Post all NBA Live Dynasty & Franchise stories here.

Sit's Rockets Dynasty - UPDATES GALORE

Postby Sit on Mon Nov 02, 2009 11:09 pm

HOUSTON ROCKETS DYNASTY

Don’t expect anything special here. And also, the dynatsy starts more than halfway down the page. You’ve been warned.

DYNASTY SETTINGS

Difficulty: All-Star/Superstar
Roster: Props to NLSC for the PC Mod (Rosters accurate as of start of 09/10 season)
Quarter Length: 8 min
Sin quarter length: 12 min
Games: 82
Playoff Format: 7-7-7-7

TEAM ROSTER

Image
Last edited by Sit on Sat Nov 07, 2009 6:21 pm, edited 14 times in total.
Image Image

Dynasty of the Year 2006 | Association of the Year 2009 | Story of the Year 2009
User avatar
Sit
 
Posts: 9300
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:19 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Sit's Dynasty

Postby Sit on Mon Nov 02, 2009 11:10 pm

Hey everyone. After fixing up my desktop and finding Live 06, I was feeling like trying the PC project on NBA Live 06. So when version 3.3 of the mod comes out, I think I'm going to start a dynasty.

Any ideas on which team to play at would be great. :)
Image Image

Dynasty of the Year 2006 | Association of the Year 2009 | Story of the Year 2009
User avatar
Sit
 
Posts: 9300
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:19 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Sit's Dynasty

Postby badreligionau on Mon Nov 02, 2009 11:13 pm

If you're playing updated rosters, I like Oklahoma City.
User avatar
badreligionau
 
Posts: 234
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: Sit's Dynasty

Postby Martti. on Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:43 am

Yes, some life in this section. :) Miami is great and so are the Rockets for example. But they might not be what you're looking for.

So you'll run this alongside ALIB II? The more, the merrier. :)
Image
-------Dynasty stories | Bucks (Current) | Heat | Wizards | 76ers
User avatar
Martti.
Good enough ain't enough.
 
Posts: 2376
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:19 am

Re: Sit's Dynasty

Postby Sit on Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:45 am

badreligionau wrote:If you're playing updated rosters, I like Oklahoma City.


I think I will pass. :)

Martti. wrote:Yes, some life in this section. :) Miami is great and so are the Rockets for example. But they might not be what you're looking for.


Not sure what I am looking for. Houston sounds intriguing. Not a fan of Miami. :)

Martti. wrote:So you'll run this alongside ALIB II? The more, the merrier. :)


Yeah man. Hopefully will have the time for it. ALIB II comes first though.
Image Image

Dynasty of the Year 2006 | Association of the Year 2009 | Story of the Year 2009
User avatar
Sit
 
Posts: 9300
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:19 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Sit's Dynasty

Postby TheDee on Tue Nov 03, 2009 6:27 am

I'd say choose a team,that wouldn't get a chance to win the Championship.
Maybe Knicks,Wolves,Clippers or Suns. :)
Bobcats would be the best !
Image
User avatar
TheDee
 
Posts: 365
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:56 am
Location: Lithuania

Re: Sit's Dynasty

Postby Cartar on Tue Nov 03, 2009 6:38 am

badreligionau wrote:If you're playing updated rosters, I like Oklahoma City.


Sorry, but I had to laugh at that, no offence.(Sit is using Oklahoma City already in his main dynasty(association), but only changed the team name to Seattle Stealth, that's why I had to laugh) Anyway, maybe Timberwolves, Portland or Atlanta?
Image
The league isn't half as bad as the sig, at least I hope so. Join up!
User avatar
Cartar
...is wrong, but don't know why.
 
Posts: 1476
Joined: Wed May 02, 2007 10:02 pm

Re: Sit's Dynasty

Postby Lamrock on Tue Nov 03, 2009 9:45 am

Go with Minnesota man. ALIB II should always come first, but I'll follow this. Good luck, and go with Minnesota.
User avatar
Lamrock
Oh yes, its back.
 
Posts: 4188
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 4:02 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: Sit's Dynasty

Postby Sit on Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:12 am

TheDee wrote:I'd say choose a team,that wouldn't get a chance to win the Championship.
Maybe Knicks,Wolves,Clippers or Suns. :)
Bobcats would be the best !


I'm sort of sick of building a team to contend. Out of all the teams mentioned, I like the Knicks.

Cartar wrote:
badreligionau wrote:If you're playing updated rosters, I like Oklahoma City.


Sorry, but I had to laugh at that, no offence.(Sit is using Oklahoma City already in his main dynasty(association), but only changed the team name to Seattle Stealth, that's why I had to laugh) Anyway, maybe Timberwolves, Portland or Atlanta?


I was laughing too. Out of those three, I like the Blazers.

Lamrock wrote:Go with Minnesota man. ALIB II should always come first, but I'll follow this. Good luck, and go with Minnesota.


No to Minnesota. :)

So comes down to: Houston or Portland or New York or Washington
Anyone got any major preference out of those four teams?
Image Image

Dynasty of the Year 2006 | Association of the Year 2009 | Story of the Year 2009
User avatar
Sit
 
Posts: 9300
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:19 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets, Blazers, Knicks, Wizards?

Postby Lamrock on Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:23 am

No to Washington. Thierry (for the time) is using them, and they sort of bore me. I like the other 3 options a lot. Houston intrigues me the most, and I might do a Rockets association after Nellieball, but thats a ways down the road. You using the Blazers would be awesome, but contenders aren't that fun to use - at least to me. Knicks are just horrible.

I would go with the decimated Rockets. No T-Mac? No Yao? No problem. Still would prefer Minnesota though, but that might just because I'm on the Ramon Sessions Bandwagon.
User avatar
Lamrock
Oh yes, its back.
 
Posts: 4188
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 4:02 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets, Blazers, Knicks, Wizards?

Postby Cleveland wins on Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:40 am

Maybe the knicks because of all the "possible" trade opportunities, in real life the knicks are trying to clear cap space for the summer of 2010 and maybe you can do the same, and try to get Lebron or Wade or something.
Cleveland wins
 
Posts: 427
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 6:49 am

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets, Blazers, Knicks, Wizards?

Postby dare019 on Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:49 am

go with houston, Ariza is a good player and maybe a comeback of the old Tmac??? :D :D :D
Image
User avatar
dare019
 
Posts: 191
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:19 pm
Location: Philippines

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets, Blazers, Knicks, Wizards?

Postby badreligionau on Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:51 am

I thought OKC was an alright team to rebuild. Durant, Westbrook and Green + 10 million in cap room... but each to their own I guess
User avatar
badreligionau
 
Posts: 234
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets, Blazers, Knicks, Wizards?

Postby Lamrock on Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:03 am

you aren't aware of the fact that he has an active 2K9 association that is essentially a Thunder association.
User avatar
Lamrock
Oh yes, its back.
 
Posts: 4188
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 4:02 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets, Blazers, Knicks, Wizards?

Postby Sit on Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:08 am

Lamrock wrote:No to Washington. Thierry (for the time) is using them, and they sort of bore me. I like the other 3 options a lot. Houston intrigues me the most, and I might do a Rockets association after Nellieball, but thats a ways down the road. You using the Blazers would be awesome, but contenders aren't that fun to use - at least to me. Knicks are just horrible.

I would go with the decimated Rockets. No T-Mac? No Yao? No problem. Still would prefer Minnesota though, but that might just because I'm on the Ramon Sessions Bandwagon.


Rockets would be good. Always loved dominating with Yao Ming. :)

Cleveland wins wrote:Maybe the knicks because of all the "possible" trade opportunities, in real life the knicks are trying to clear cap space for the summer of 2010 and maybe you can do the same, and try to get Lebron or Wade or something.


I was thinking the same thing about building a team with the cap space in New York.

dare019 wrote:go with houston, Ariza is a good player and maybe a comeback of the old Tmac??? :D :D :D


Another vote for Houston. (Y)

badreligionau wrote:I thought OKC was an alright team to rebuild. Durant, Westbrook and Green + 10 million in cap room... but each to their own I guess


This is why I'm not going to use OKC

Lamrock wrote:you aren't aware of the fact that he has an active 2K9 association that is essentially a Thunder association.


Blasphemy. Agreed? :lol:
Image Image

Dynasty of the Year 2006 | Association of the Year 2009 | Story of the Year 2009
User avatar
Sit
 
Posts: 9300
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:19 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets, Blazers, Knicks, Wizards?

Postby badreligionau on Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:23 am

Ah yeah, I have to admit I don't look in that section a whole lot. With that in mind, I think Chicago or Memphis... all depends on whether you want to rebuild a team or get a ring straight away.

*edit* out of those 4, probably the rockets imo
User avatar
badreligionau
 
Posts: 234
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets, Blazers, Knicks, Wizards?

Postby XxHyperDunk24 on Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:26 am

I would love to see a Pacers dynasty. (Y) Out of the teams you suggested though, I would go with either the Knicks or the Rockets. More preferably the Knicks.
User avatar
XxHyperDunk24
 
Posts: 520
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 7:30 am
Location: Cleveland, Ohio

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets, Blazers, Knicks, Wizards?

Postby Sit on Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:33 am

badreligionau wrote:Ah yeah, I have to admit I don't look in that section a whole lot. With that in mind, I think Chicago or Memphis... all depends on whether you want to rebuild a team or get a ring straight away.

*edit* out of those 4, probably the rockets imo


That's cool. :) No to the Bulls and the Grizzlies!

XxHyperDunk24 wrote:I would love to see a Pacers dynasty. (Y) Out of the teams you suggested though, I would go with either the Knicks or the Rockets. More preferably the Knicks.


Come down to either Knicks or Rockets. I'm very much 50-50.
Image Image

Dynasty of the Year 2006 | Association of the Year 2009 | Story of the Year 2009
User avatar
Sit
 
Posts: 9300
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:19 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets or Knicks?

Postby Lamrock on Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:34 am

GO WITH THE ROCKETS.
User avatar
Lamrock
Oh yes, its back.
 
Posts: 4188
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 4:02 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets or Knicks?

Postby dare019 on Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:55 am

go rockets go... i would love to see if Tmac can past the 1st round...
Image
User avatar
dare019
 
Posts: 191
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:19 pm
Location: Philippines

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets or Knicks?

Postby Sit on Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:59 am

Lamrock wrote:
GO WITH THE ROCKETS.

dare019 wrote:go rockets go... i would love to see if Tmac can past the 1st round...


Perhaps I should go with the popular choice. :)

Updated first post.
Image Image

Dynasty of the Year 2006 | Association of the Year 2009 | Story of the Year 2009
User avatar
Sit
 
Posts: 9300
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:19 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets or Knicks?

Postby Lamrock on Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:04 pm

Gotta be Houston. Such an intriguing concept and the consensus favorite. Make David Andersen a star.
User avatar
Lamrock
Oh yes, its back.
 
Posts: 4188
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 4:02 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets or Knicks?

Postby dare019 on Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:16 pm

Lamrock wrote:Make David Andersen a star.


And get Mills.. Australian Team LOL
Image
User avatar
dare019
 
Posts: 191
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:19 pm
Location: Philippines

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets or Knicks?

Postby thierryhenry50 on Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:39 pm

Houston man!
Image
^^ Click ^^
User avatar
thierryhenry50
The 25+ unsuccessful dynasties guy
 
Posts: 5174
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 11:34 am
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets or Knicks?

Postby C-77 on Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:17 pm

Rockets! :mrgreen:
Image
|Proud to be a Bedan|Bryan_C. is my cousin|Cavs & Magic fan|Pinoy Ako|

Follow me on Twitter


{♣NBA LIVE IS STILL LIVE!!♣}
User avatar
C-77
The Poster
 
Posts: 783
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 11:58 pm
Location: Cainta,Rizal Philippines

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets or Knicks?

Postby TheDee on Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:20 pm

Im The Only one Saying Knicks. :oops:
Image
User avatar
TheDee
 
Posts: 365
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:56 am
Location: Lithuania

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets or Knicks?

Postby newc on Wed Nov 04, 2009 1:09 am

Houston
User avatar
newc
 
Posts: 129
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 3:47 pm
Location: Latvia

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets or Knicks?

Postby Cartar on Wed Nov 04, 2009 1:17 am

TheDee wrote:Im The Only one Saying Knicks. :oops:


No, same here. They suck this year, but if you would get something from the 10' sweepstakes, it would be interesting. But on the other hand, considering Live's logic, there will be like max 2 or 3 great players out there at best.
Image
The league isn't half as bad as the sig, at least I hope so. Join up!
User avatar
Cartar
...is wrong, but don't know why.
 
Posts: 1476
Joined: Wed May 02, 2007 10:02 pm

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets or Knicks?

Postby hova- on Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:22 am

Simple and plain. Rockets. Good luck :)
Image
thx to Marquis for this sig
User avatar
hova-
 
Posts: 2068
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 12:33 am
Location: Augsburg, Germany

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets or Knicks?

Postby XpLosibo on Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:26 am

both teams would be fine, coz you can make great stories out of it. but there are more intrigues and drama in new york. so it's NYK all the way! (Y)
==========================
***** Im Chasing Perfection *****
==========================
Image
User avatar
XpLosibo
 
Posts: 871
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 5:27 am
Location: Man from Manila

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets or Knicks?

Postby Sit on Wed Nov 04, 2009 10:14 am

New York 3
Houston 4237849681235

hmmm... thanks for the input guys! Going to make my final decision soon! :)
Image Image

Dynasty of the Year 2006 | Association of the Year 2009 | Story of the Year 2009
User avatar
Sit
 
Posts: 9300
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:19 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Sit's Dynasty

Postby TheDee on Wed Nov 04, 2009 10:16 am

So It's The Rockets.
Good luck. :)
Image
User avatar
TheDee
 
Posts: 365
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:56 am
Location: Lithuania

Re: Sit's Dynasty

Postby Sit on Wed Nov 04, 2009 10:24 am

TheDee wrote:So It's The Rockets.
Good luck. :)


I never said that :lol:
Image Image

Dynasty of the Year 2006 | Association of the Year 2009 | Story of the Year 2009
User avatar
Sit
 
Posts: 9300
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:19 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Sit's Dynasty

Postby Cartar on Wed Nov 04, 2009 10:38 am

Sit wrote:
TheDee wrote:So It's The Rockets.
Good luck. :)


I never said that :lol:


But you did pick the photo of Ariza shooting, not the other one, hence the Rockets.
Image
The league isn't half as bad as the sig, at least I hope so. Join up!
User avatar
Cartar
...is wrong, but don't know why.
 
Posts: 1476
Joined: Wed May 02, 2007 10:02 pm

Re: Sit's Dynasty

Postby Sit on Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:18 am

Cartar wrote:
Sit wrote:
TheDee wrote:So It's The Rockets.
Good luck. :)


I never said that :lol:


But you did pick the photo of Ariza shooting, not the other one, hence the Rockets.


You know me, I like to throw people off. :)
Image Image

Dynasty of the Year 2006 | Association of the Year 2009 | Story of the Year 2009
User avatar
Sit
 
Posts: 9300
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:19 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Sit's Dynasty

Postby Lamrock on Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:22 am

Haha One day and you haven't even picked a team yet and already 36 posts. You sir, are a hype master.
User avatar
Lamrock
Oh yes, its back.
 
Posts: 4188
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 4:02 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: Sit's Dynasty

Postby Sit on Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:32 am

I am not a hype master lol... check out all my other dynastys, start pretty much straight away :lol:
Image Image

Dynasty of the Year 2006 | Association of the Year 2009 | Story of the Year 2009
User avatar
Sit
 
Posts: 9300
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:19 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Sit's Dynasty

Postby Sit on Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:34 am

CONFIRMING THE WORST KEPT SECRET
Note: First Post Updated with team roster!

Image

Image
Last edited by Sit on Wed Nov 04, 2009 12:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image Image

Dynasty of the Year 2006 | Association of the Year 2009 | Story of the Year 2009
User avatar
Sit
 
Posts: 9300
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:19 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Worst Kept Secret Announced

Postby Lamrock on Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:39 am

Epic win. I hope Landry isn't underrated with your roster. Very underrated player.
User avatar
Lamrock
Oh yes, its back.
 
Posts: 4188
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 4:02 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Worst Kept Secret Announced

Postby dare019 on Wed Nov 04, 2009 12:10 pm

haha.. with all that hype you made you still picked the rockets.. :D :D :D
Image
User avatar
dare019
 
Posts: 191
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:19 pm
Location: Philippines

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Worst Kept Secret Announced

Postby Martti. on Wed Nov 04, 2009 3:19 pm

Will you activate T-Mac at some point? Or go the whole season without him?
Image
-------Dynasty stories | Bucks (Current) | Heat | Wizards | 76ers
User avatar
Martti.
Good enough ain't enough.
 
Posts: 2376
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:19 am

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Worst Kept Secret Announced

Postby Jing on Wed Nov 04, 2009 5:00 pm

LOL Houston, figures. GL with the team.
User avatar
Jing
 
Posts: 9765
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 9:29 am
Location: College

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Worst Kept Secret Announced

Postby Sit on Thu Nov 05, 2009 9:40 am

Martti. wrote:Will you activate T-Mac at some point? Or go the whole season without him?


Most probably the second option. :)
Image Image

Dynasty of the Year 2006 | Association of the Year 2009 | Story of the Year 2009
User avatar
Sit
 
Posts: 9300
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:19 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Worst Kept Secret Announced

Postby The X on Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:41 am

Damn, just noticed this. Old school :P I'll keep an eye on this one

Maybe you should go shorter seasons (29 or 58) to get through them. Just a thought.
User avatar
The X
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 7454
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Worst Kept Secret Announced

Postby Sit on Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:47 am

The X wrote:Damn, just noticed this. Old school :P I'll keep an eye on this one

Maybe you should go shorter seasons (29 or 58) to get through them. Just a thought.


I decided to go with 82 :)

More realistic.
Image Image

Dynasty of the Year 2006 | Association of the Year 2009 | Story of the Year 2009
User avatar
Sit
 
Posts: 9300
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:19 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Worst Kept Secret Announced

Postby Sit on Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:52 pm

FIRST DAY AT THE OFFICE

The first day in the Houston Rockets front office was an uneventful one. Got in here, looking to move the rest of Daryl Morey’s stuff out of here, then I had a meeting with the team owner who went on to state his disappointment in Morey having assembled a roster full of late first round and second round draft picks. After the meeting, I had lunch, and got back to my office to find the following message on this little gadget that was given to me:

Image

Moments later, he sent me another message:

Image

Turns out I’m starting from scratch and have to hire my own staff. It sounds like a bit of a tough ask especially when I should really be focusing my time on fixing up this goddamn roster, especially since my two stars Yao Ming and Tracy Mcgrady are going to be out for full seasons. I really don’t think that Trevor Ariza and Aaron Brooks are going to do the job.
Image Image

Dynasty of the Year 2006 | Association of the Year 2009 | Story of the Year 2009
User avatar
Sit
 
Posts: 9300
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:19 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Worst Kept Secret Announced

Postby Andrew on Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:18 pm

Good luck with the Dynasty, I'll try to keep up. (Y)
Roster Updates: NBA Live 08 | NBA Live 07 | NBA Live 06 | NBA Live 2005
Dynasty Threads: NBA Live 10 | NBA Live 09 | NBA Live 06 | NBA Live 2004

Image
Thanks to TheDee for the signature
User avatar
Andrew
speaks of a deeper wisdom
Site Admin
 
Posts: 47675
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Newcastle, Australia

Re: Sit's Rockets Dynasty

Postby badreligionau on Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:07 pm

Ah those screens take me back. Good luck with the dynasty, it looks like it's going to be an interesting one
User avatar
badreligionau
 
Posts: 234
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Worst Kept Secret Announced

Postby Sit on Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:19 am

Andrew wrote:Good luck with the Dynasty, I'll try to keep up. (Y)


Thanks man, much appreciated. We all love old school dynastys. :)

badreligionau wrote:Ah those screens take me back. Good luck with the dynasty, it looks like it's going to be an interesting one


Good old days. :)
Image Image

Dynasty of the Year 2006 | Association of the Year 2009 | Story of the Year 2009
User avatar
Sit
 
Posts: 9300
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:19 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Sit's Rockets Dynasty

Postby Lamrock on Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:22 am

Yeah, if I weren't a console gamer, I would be tempted to do an old-school dynasty on the side, probably with Seattle. If/when my 360 gets RROD maybe... Can't wait for you to start this!
User avatar
Lamrock
Oh yes, its back.
 
Posts: 4188
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 4:02 pm
Location: Seattle

Next

Return to NBA Live Dynasty & Franchise Stories

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests