Mon Oct 02, 2006 2:29 am
Mon Oct 02, 2006 2:37 am
Mon Oct 02, 2006 2:56 am
Mon Oct 02, 2006 3:15 am
As long time NBA Live fans, some of us even from when EA was putting "vs." in their titles, we have been around the block with EA many times. Most of us have gone beyond mere fans into "fanatics" spending countless man-hours on fan sites or making modifications or patches for the games. Even those of us who have not, have spent as many hours involving ourselves in an ever expanding community of other NBA Live fans. If anyone deserves the tag "hardcore fan" it's us. We've stuck by EA and NBA Live in the face of serious competition from the 2K series.
For us however, NBA Live 07 is the final straw. The one that broke the camel's back. The spark that set the field ablaze. Until this release we overlooked any flaws in the game, one's some of us considered major even if others of us considered them minor. But this release to us ignited feelings that EA doesn't care about its fans, which is why we're writing today.
Irregardless of whether EA does or does not care about its fans, the bigger issue is perception. The image that EA presents is that they don't. (don't what?) Every year, we as a community submit one or more wishlists, often with the same wishes from year to year. A lack of implementation of the wishes sows seeds of belief that EA isn't paying attention. When EA releases a game in which the CPU won't even use its bench, and overrides user substitutions, it sows seeds that EA didn't care and just wanted to cash in. When major online media doesn't get review copies, it leads to the belief that EA knew the product was defective but proceeded anyway. When community members contact EA and receive a response that seems to imply EA isn't too interested in fixing the problems and telling us to wait until the next game, it does quite a bit of harm to our faith in EA.
While we'd love a patch to fix the major issues with the game, that is the not major focus of our letter, as we have a patch petition for that. Our focus is not simply on this release, but a sense that we see in other EA-related communities, whether it's the NFL gaming community or the people who play Battlefield 2.
At one time, EA was producing the best titles money could buy and one had little reason to look elsewhere. Now gamers have a sense that if you want the best, it's not EA. Whether it's looking at the NBA 2K series for our basketball game fix or users leaving Battlefield 2 because they feel the problems will never be fixed, it's a sense that we're sharing. We look at NBA Live over the last few years and we see the same basic game being re-released with new fancy features. The same underlying problems from the last few years are still there, some have been tweaked but the overall issues still exist. While there are plenty of new features, it gives the impression that EA is saying in response to the lingering issues "yeah, well, HEY! Look at this!" Be it All-Star Weekend (a old wish that EA has in fact fulfilled), superstar moves or dynasty additions. While those additions are nice to have, it is piling on a base that cannot support it. The base should be strengthened while the structure is constructed, instead of just building a new structure on the old crumbling base.
As alluded to earlier, it's not just the practice of EA's actions as much as the perception. EA is often criticized for rushing out products, going back on its word and ignoring fans. While EA may or may not be doing that, when one hears that, it's easy to fit what the company is doing into that mold. It doesn't help that when we look at other communities, where the game developers openly participate on the forums and seem to be actively involved in the community. While EA has made overtures to the NBA Live community over the years, whether it was hiring Tim, holding Community Summit/Day's, participating in interviews or sending in screenshots or videos. (incomplete sentances) It still seems like EA is distant and uninvolved in the community. Even if we have an inkling EA is reading the forums daily, the impression is still there that they aren't paying attention (in) anyway. Some of us are looking for little more than EA explaining why they did or didn't do something in the game, for acknowledgement of issues or ideas presented, for assistance in greater understanding of the game.
When we find major issues in the game and hear nothing from EA. When we contact EA, get a response that seems to do more to harm our opinion than satisfy us. When we're told we shouldn't share what EA tells us. It all serves to reinforce our negative perceptions.
We're willing to put in the effort to improve the game, the question that we're increasingly asking becomes, is EA?
Mon Oct 02, 2006 3:22 am
As long time NBA Live fans, some of us even from when EA was putting "vs." in their titles, we have been around the block with EA many times. Most of us have gone beyond mere fans into "fanatics" spending countless man-hours on fan sites or making modifications or patches for the games. Even those of us who have not, have spent as many hours involving ourselves in an ever expanding community of other NBA Live fans. If anyone deserves the tag "hardcore fan" it's us. We've stuck by EA and NBA Live in the face of serious competition from the 2K series.
For us however, NBA Live 07 is the final straw. The one that broke the camel's back. The spark that set the field ablaze. Until this release we overlooked any flaws in the game, one's some of us considered major even if others of us considered them minor. But this release to us ignited feelings that EA doesn't care about its fans, which is why we're writing today.
Irregardless of whether EA does or does not care about its fan, the bigger issue is perception. The image that EA presents is that they don't. Every year, we as a community submit one or more wishlists, often with the same wishes from year to year. A lack of implementation of the wishes sows seeds of belief that EA isn't paying attention. When EA releases a game in which the CPU won't even use its bench, and overrides user substitutions, it sows seeds that EA didn't care and just wanted to cash in. When major online media doesn't get review copies, it leads to the belief that EA knew the product was defective but proceeded anyway. When community members contact EA and receive a response that seems to imply EA isn't too interested in fixing the problems and telling us to wait until the next game, it does quite a bit of harm to our faith in EA.
While we'd love a patch to fix the major issues with the game, that is the not major focus of our letter, as we have a patch petition for that. Our focus is not simply on this release, but a sense that we see in other EA-related communities whether it's the NFL gaming community or the people who play Battlefield 2.
At one time, EA was producing the best titles money could buy and one had little reason to look elsewhere. Now gamers have a sense that if you want the best, it's not EA. Whether it's looking at the NBA 2K series for our basketball game fix or users leaving Battlefield 2 because they feel the problems will never be fixed, it's a sense that we're sharing. We look at NBA Live over the last few years and we see the same basic game being re-released with new fancy features. The same underlying problems from the last few years are still there, some have been tweaked but the overall issues still exist. While there are plenty of new features, it gives the impression that EA is saying in response to the lingering issues "yeah, well, HEY! Look at this!" Be it All-Star Weekend (a old wish that EA has in fact fulfilled), superstar moves or dynasty additions. While those additions are nice to have, it is piling on a base that cannot support it. The base should be strengthened while the structure is constructed, instead of just building a new structure on the old crumbling base.
As alluded to earlier, it's not just the practice of EA's actions as much as the perception. EA is often criticized for rushing out products, going back on its word and ignoring fans. While EA may or may not be doing that, when one hears that, it's easy to fit what the company is doing into that mold. It doesn't help when we look at other communities, where the game developers openly participate on the forums and seem to be actively involved in the community. While EA has made overtures to the NBA Live community over the years, whether it was hiring Tim, holding Community Summit/Day's, participating in interviews or sending in screenshots or videos. It still seems like EA is distant and uninvolved in the community. Even if we have an inkling EA is reading the forums daily, the impression is still there they aren't paying attention in anyway. Some of us are looking for little more than EA explaining why they did or didn't do something in the game, for acknowledgement of issues or ideas presented, for assistance in greater understanding of the game.
When we find major issues in the game and hear nothing from EA. When we contact EA, get a response that seems to do more to harm our opinion than satisfy us. When we're told we shouldn't share what EA tells us. It all serves to reinforce our negative perceptions.
We're willing to put in the effort to improve the game, the question that we're increasingly asking becomes, is EA?
Mon Oct 02, 2006 3:53 am
Mon Oct 02, 2006 4:23 am
Mon Oct 02, 2006 4:50 am
Mon Oct 02, 2006 4:54 am
Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:05 am
Whether EA does or does not care about its fans, the bigger issue is perception, and the image that EA presents is that they don't. Every year, we as a community submit one or more wishlists, often with the same wishes from year to year. A lack of implementation of the wishes sows seeds of belief that EA isn't paying attention. When EA releases a game in which the CPU won't even use its bench, and overrides user substitutions, it sows seeds that EA didn't care and just wanted to cash in. When major online media doesn't get review copies, it leads to the belief that EA knew the product was defective but proceeded anyway. When community members contact EA and receive a response that seems to imply EA isn't too interested in fixing the problems and telling us to wait until the next game, it does quite a bit of harm to our faith in EA.
We're willing to put in the effort to improve the game, the question that we're increasingly asking becomes, is EA (willing)?
Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:31 am
As long time NBA Live fans, some of us even from when EA was putting "vs." in their titles, we have been around the block with EA many times. Most of us have gone beyond mere fans into "fanatics" spending countless man-hours on fan sites or making modifications or patches for the games. Even those of us who have not, have spent as many hours involving ourselves in an ever expanding community of other NBA Live fans. If anyone deserves the tag "hardcore fan" it's us. We've stuck by EA and NBA Live in the face of serious competition from the 2K series.
For us however, NBA Live 07 is the final straw. The one that broke the camel's back. The spark that set the field ablaze. Until this release we overlooked any flaws in the game, ones some of us considered major even if others of us considered them minor. But this release to us ignited feelings that EA doesn't care about its fans, which is why we're writing today.
Whether EA does or does not care about its fans, the bigger issue is perception, and the image that EA presents is that they don't. Every year, we as a community submit one or more wishlists, often with the same wishes from year to year. A lack of implementation of the wishes sows seeds of belief that EA isn't paying attention. When EA releases a game in which the CPU won't even use its bench, and overrides user substitutions, it sows seeds that EA didn't care and just wanted to cash in. When major online media doesn't get review copies, it leads to the belief that EA knew the product was defective but proceeded anyway. When community members contact EA and receive a response that seems to imply EA isn't too interested in fixing the problems and telling us to wait until the next game, it does quite a bit of harm to our faith in EA.
While we'd love a patch to fix the major issues with the game, that is the not major focus of our letter, as we have a patch petition for that. Our focus is not simply on this release, but a sense that we see in other EA-related communities whether it's the NFL gaming community or the people who play Battlefield 2.
At one time, EA was producing the best titles money could buy and one had little reason to look elsewhere. Now gamers have a sense that if you want the best, it's not EA. Whether it's looking at the NBA 2K series for our basketball game fix or users leaving Battlefield 2 because they feel the problems will never be fixed, it's a sense that we're sharing. We look at NBA Live over the last few years and we see the same basic game being re-released with new fancy features. The same underlying problems from the last few years are still there, some have been tweaked but the overall issues still exist. While there are plenty of new features, it gives the impression that EA is saying in response to the lingering issues "yeah, well, HEY! Look at this!" Be it All-Star Weekend (an old wish that EA has in fact fulfilled), superstar moves or dynasty additions. While those additions are nice to have, it is piling on a base that cannot support it. The base should be strengthened while the structure is constructed, instead of just building a new structure on the old crumbling base.
As alluded to earlier, it's not just the practice of EA's actions as much as the perception. EA is often criticized for rushing out products, going back on its word and ignoring fans. While EA may or may not be doing that, when one hears that, it's easy to fit what the company is doing into that mold. It doesn't help when we look at other communities, where the game developers openly participate on the forums and seem to be actively involved in the community. While EA has made overtures to the NBA Live community over the years, whether it was hiring Tim, holding Community Summit/Days, participating in interviews or sending in screenshots or videos, it still seems like EA is distant and uninvolved in the community. Even if we have an inkling EA is reading the forums daily, the impression is still there that they aren't paying attention at all. Some of us are looking for little more than EA explaining why they did or didn't do something in the game, for acknowledgement of issues or ideas presented, for assistance in greater understanding of the game.
When we find major issues in the game and hear nothing from EA. When we contact EA, get a response that seems to do more to harm our opinion than satisfy us. When we're told we shouldn't share what EA tells us. It all serves to reinforce our negative perceptions.
We're willing to put in the effort to improve the game, the question that we're increasingly asking becomes, is EA?
Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:51 am
Mon Oct 02, 2006 6:45 am
Mon Oct 02, 2006 7:58 am
Mon Oct 02, 2006 8:34 am
Mon Oct 02, 2006 8:37 am
Mon Oct 02, 2006 11:59 am
Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:33 pm
Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:12 pm
Jimi_Hendrix wrote:Excellent letter, i really like the whole "the consumer fighting back" idea.
But I like to think that we, the consumer, have quite a few options on making a dynamic statement. Not that the letter isn't great, but a formal complaint letter can only do so much.
We live in the age of the Internet 2. A time that communication has evolved from the "1 on 1" aspect of email. We have resources that can create a huge impact on EA's market. I give you two alternative options:
www.YouTube.com and www.MySpace.com
The two most widely used Internet websites. A huge audience, from all genres.
Getting your "NBA Live 07 Complaint" video featured on YouTube's main page is equivelent of 50 thousand people getting the message : "Dont buy the game" . The same can be said for MySpace, who's audience is close to EA's consumer group target.
I really think a video (and when i say video, i mean a well produced, well directed video) pointing out the major flaws of this years game, could get EA's attention.
Awaiting benji's comments.
Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:36 pm
Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:49 pm
Mon Oct 02, 2006 2:02 pm
Mon Oct 02, 2006 2:57 pm
Mon Oct 02, 2006 3:04 pm
Mon Oct 02, 2006 3:26 pm