These look much better than what was previously showed

Talk about NBA Live 07 here.

These look much better than what was previously showed

Postby Uptempo on Mon Sep 18, 2006 1:38 am

Maybe you guy's are going a little overboard too soon on Live 07. These video clips look much better and probably because the game is further along than what was previously showed.

http://www.nba.com/videogames/nbalive07 ... tml#player
Uptempo
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 10:16 am

Postby bigh0rt on Mon Sep 18, 2006 1:44 am

I believe this video was shown quite awhile ago.
User avatar
bigh0rt
NLSC Team Member
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 9032
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: New York

Postby Uptempo on Mon Sep 18, 2006 1:46 am

bigh0rt wrote:I believe this video was shown quite awhile ago.


If it was then it looks better than what half the forum is complaining about from gamespot. So which video's show the game closer to being complete is the question?
Uptempo
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 10:16 am

Postby bigh0rt on Mon Sep 18, 2006 1:48 am

Uptempo wrote:
bigh0rt wrote:I believe this video was shown quite awhile ago.


If it was then it looks better than what half the forum is complaining about from gamespot. So which video's show the game closer to being complete is the question?


The forum just likes to bitch. They have the anonymity of the internet to hide behind, and nobody from EA to oppose them -- so they feel a sense of strength from berating a video game. That's my theory at least.

As I've said from Day 1, I think Live 07 will be their best release in recent history, especially the PC version, following some patchwork and modifications :wink:. I haven't paid a ton of attention to next gen, however.
User avatar
bigh0rt
NLSC Team Member
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 9032
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: New York

Postby Uptempo on Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:15 am

That's what I don't understand. He said those videos were already posted yet I see another thread with a bunch of guy's crying the blues. If these videos were already seen then please tell me what is wrong with them because I really don't see how they show the game looks bad. They look pretty good to me judging from those videos. But I guess gamespot videos over shadow these because gamespot shows the game in a more negative way and by all means it appears negativity is what some of these guy's value more.
Uptempo
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 10:16 am

Postby --- on Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:22 am

The video is quite old, but i dont see anything wrong with how the game is looking. In my opinion, the game is looking great, and the more stuff i learn about it, the more i anticipate it. I just hope FSS doesnt ruin it, looking good tho.
User avatar
---
 
Posts: 4553
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 3:04 pm

Postby Truth on Mon Sep 18, 2006 4:46 am

Uptempo wrote:
bigh0rt wrote:I believe this video was shown quite awhile ago.


If it was then it looks better than what half the forum is complaining about from gamespot. So which video's show the game closer to being complete is the question?


i think your getting confused between the nextgen and currentgen... do some reading
User avatar
Truth
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 5:33 am
Location: UK

Postby Voxel on Mon Sep 18, 2006 6:14 am

Uptempo wrote:That's what I don't understand. He said those videos were already posted yet I see another thread with a bunch of guy's crying the blues. If these videos were already seen then please tell me what is wrong with them because I really don't see how they show the game looks bad. They look pretty good to me judging from those videos. But I guess gamespot videos over shadow these because gamespot shows the game in a more negative way and by all means it appears negativity is what some of these guy's value more.


this video, which had been posted before, only shows signature jumpshots... while the gamespot videos show actual in-game situations. i thought the shot animations were cool, but the gamespot videos showed that shot animations don't matter too much if they don't get the actual gameplay right.
Voxel
 
Posts: 240
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 3:07 am

Postby cocobee on Mon Sep 18, 2006 11:34 am

Voxel wrote:
Uptempo wrote:That's what I don't understand. He said those videos were already posted yet I see another thread with a bunch of guy's crying the blues. If these videos were already seen then please tell me what is wrong with them because I really don't see how they show the game looks bad. They look pretty good to me judging from those videos. But I guess gamespot videos over shadow these because gamespot shows the game in a more negative way and by all means it appears negativity is what some of these guy's value more.


this video, which had been posted before, only shows signature jumpshots... while the gamespot videos show actual in-game situations. i thought the shot animations were cool, but the gamespot videos showed that shot animations don't matter too much if they don't get the actual gameplay right.


Exactly. Take those EA colored glasses off for a second and look at the gameplay video at gamespot-not this compilation video that could've been made for marketing purposes.
User avatar
cocobee
America's Team
 
Posts: 3000
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2002 3:46 pm
Location: in the coochie...

Postby Uptempo on Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:28 pm

cocobee wrote:
Voxel wrote:
Uptempo wrote:That's what I don't understand. He said those videos were already posted yet I see another thread with a bunch of guy's crying the blues. If these videos were already seen then please tell me what is wrong with them because I really don't see how they show the game looks bad. They look pretty good to me judging from those videos. But I guess gamespot videos over shadow these because gamespot shows the game in a more negative way and by all means it appears negativity is what some of these guy's value more.


this video, which had been posted before, only shows signature jumpshots... while the gamespot videos show actual in-game situations. i thought the shot animations were cool, but the gamespot videos showed that shot animations don't matter too much if they don't get the actual gameplay right.


Exactly. Take those EA colored glasses off for a second and look at the gameplay video at gamespot-not this compilation video that could've been made for marketing purposes.



So your telling me you know exactly how far along the gamespot videos were at the time they were showed?

If you do please let me what percentage of the game was complete during those videos compared to the jump shot video's. I don't think anyone knows the answer to that quetsion but you'll tell me to take off my EA glasses yet you don't know what the build percentage was in the videos. I'd say take off your negative glasses and and atleast make a judgement once you get confirmation that the game is complete.
Uptempo
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 10:16 am

Postby Uptempo on Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:32 pm

Voxel wrote:
Uptempo wrote:That's what I don't understand. He said those videos were already posted yet I see another thread with a bunch of guy's crying the blues. If these videos were already seen then please tell me what is wrong with them because I really don't see how they show the game looks bad. They look pretty good to me judging from those videos. But I guess gamespot videos over shadow these because gamespot shows the game in a more negative way and by all means it appears negativity is what some of these guy's value more.


this video, which had been posted before, only shows signature jumpshots... while the gamespot videos show actual in-game situations. i thought the shot animations were cool, but the gamespot videos showed that shot animations don't matter too much if they don't get the actual gameplay right.


Again what percentage of the gameplay was complete in the gamespot videos?

Maybe I missed something and they said that was the final build.
Uptempo
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 10:16 am

Postby Uptempo on Tue Sep 19, 2006 2:01 am

Never mind disregard the question because I found out the game was only at about 80% complete. It definetly looks like the potential of the game was overblown BIG TIME based on a build that was roughly 20% or more from being complete. This video shows much a much better representation of game. But I'm sure the negative guy's will stick with what they saw at gamespot.


http://youtube.com/watch?v=SxTRsZrfyxA& ... ed&search=
Uptempo
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 10:16 am

Postby bigh0rt on Tue Sep 19, 2006 2:29 am

Uptempo wrote:Never mind disregard the question because I found out the game was only at about 80% complete. It definetly looks like the potential of the game was overblown BIG TIME based on a build that was roughly 20% or more from being complete. This video shows much a much better representation of game. But I'm sure the negative guy's will stick with what they saw at gamespot.


http://youtube.com/watch?v=SxTRsZrfyxA& ... ed&search=


This is another video from weeks ago.
User avatar
bigh0rt
NLSC Team Member
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 9032
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: New York


Return to NBA Live 07

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests