by Oznogrd on Thu Jan 04, 2007 6:14 pm
Domoman, if you ever come back: patches-i'd say the SUM, Andrew's Rosters, and many of the more excellent patches are all gonna be worth it, but the problem is patience. Start with the EA official patch, and i'm running Jimmy's rosters right now but an old version. Hopefully someone else can attest to AI changes, i'm happy just tweaking my sliders a bit.
As for a team: It depends on what level you play on and your style of play. Most teams except for a couple qualify for what you named. We can obviously rule out Miami...but if you want a middling team, i agree with nets4life except on the bulls: its just too easy. Maybe i play with them too much but i've yet to have any trouble with big ben scoring 20+. Then when they start double teaming him, popping out to gordon or hinrich. While i love DaBulls, i think they should be considered more than middling. Utah is interesting because I think Kirilenko and Okur arent nearly as good as Deron and Boozer (when healthy of course..) and it makes for a new dynamic of the game: removing yourself from FSS moves....Sacramento: i tend to dominate with artest/bibby a little too much for my liking but it might work for you. The Wizards i think also after one or two moves are as close to a description of a "good mix" team in the league. You have the go to guy in Arenas, and then the rest who can come through, but may not always. It could make for a nice challenging dynasty. Try it out and let us know how it goes man. I switch teams alot and can say i've played at least 1 full season with all those teams.
