Mike James overal raiting

[shox15]

Hi dear Andrew! This theme about Mike James was already discussed many times, but not led to correct result! Why player with such statistics(PPG 20.3,RPG 3.30,APG 5.8) and percentage made can have such small rating (69) For example Steve Francis stats is much worse than Mike James statistics, but he have 89 overal raiting! And last games in toronto when Bosh was injured James was poor leader and toronto was scoring much thx to him. Review his rating man he is one of toronto leaders with Bosh!

[Vanny]

nothing especially new in this post , but i think i must agree thing about statistic of James this season ........ 20 pt it's like scorers stat ..... but boss is not me , i think andrew will look @ 20 pt per game =)

[KDWilliams85]

If you consider who Mike James plays for, it's very likely that his statistics are inflated. The only other legitimate scorer on that team is Chris Bosh. Mo Pete is a streaky player.

Besides, I believe Mike James was playing for stats so he can get loaded. Seeing as this is a contract year for him.

If he does this three years in a row, then he may warrant a 89 rating.

[shox15]

If you consider who Mike James plays for, it's very likely that his statistics are inflated. The only other legitimate scorer on that team is Chris Bosh. Mo Pete is a streaky player.

Besides, I believe Mike James was playing for stats so he can get loaded. Seeing as this is a contract year for him.

If he does this three years in a row, then he may warrant a 89 rating.

Lol man!!! All your words is fuuny!!! Do you see in NBA live though one player, who made 20 points in game and has a rating 69 or less? Such is not present!!!I wished to show only that the player who made 20 points per match and in a weak team, where and so few stars deserve a rating greater than 69!

[Andrew]

As I have explained many, many, many, many times, I do not boost the overall rating just so it looks better, and I will not do that. I'll take another look at his individual ratings though.

I think the Mike James discussions have already been done to death so please, no more for now.