Dynasty Roster
Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:40 am
Let me put this way. Usually there are 3 different rosters within the NLSC roster. The initial, the uninjured and the NLSC roster.
I think the nlsc is the most accurate to the nba, as it follows the latest starting lineups and injuries.. but , in order to do so, the patch team modifies the first and second position. Don´t get me wrong, it´s great.
I think there should be a roster where the players first and second positions should be set more approprietate to the dinasty mode.
Altought Robert Horry role last year was to the PC- C positions, they should keep him as a SF-pF or PF-Sf so the computer will have a more accurate team rotation, even if the player gets traded..
This goes for other players, like d. marshall, b. Grant, Dirk...
My point is that there should be a roster where the players have their original first and secondary positions according to their game instead of according to their current role....
I think the nlsc is the most accurate to the nba, as it follows the latest starting lineups and injuries.. but , in order to do so, the patch team modifies the first and second position. Don´t get me wrong, it´s great.
I think there should be a roster where the players first and second positions should be set more approprietate to the dinasty mode.
Altought Robert Horry role last year was to the PC- C positions, they should keep him as a SF-pF or PF-Sf so the computer will have a more accurate team rotation, even if the player gets traded..
This goes for other players, like d. marshall, b. Grant, Dirk...
My point is that there should be a roster where the players have their original first and secondary positions according to their game instead of according to their current role....
Fri Sep 30, 2005 4:53 pm
That's probably what I'll do with the "Uninjured version", which I suppose I could rename "Dynasty Rosters" since it's a similar principle for maintaining those rosters as well.