Basing Rookie Ratings ON Number Picked

[Mike Bradford]

I hope they dont base all rookie ratings on where they went in the draft, because anyone who slipped and is still a good player will get shitty ratings, and some who dont deserve good ones will get them, and although we can edit them, when it comes to net play, it can get very annoying.

[hipn]

they obviously wont. I mean do u see that 2nd round pick by detroit in 2004? he didnt have a good rating. Ratings are basically based on collage/university stats.

[Mike Bradford]

arent you just proving my point. 2nd round = crap for stats, which isnt always the case.

[Malfa]

I think he means second pick..in 2003? Lol..maybe not..but Darko didn't have a good rating.

[Anthony15]

Darko sucks big time he is the worst player on any team in live 05( he is like 37, and all guys in 30's are FA)

[hipn]

millichcih or w/e his name is 37 y o ?

[Malfa]

Darko is rated 53 I think in NBA Live 2005.

[hipn]

lol its a good rating, fits him

[Mike Bradford]

oh yeah he did mean 2nd pick (though he said 2nd round), but in 2004 (his rookie season) Darko was a 62, and D-Wade a 60, and Bosh a 59, so it appears to me, if they havnt seen them play in the NBA, they base it on the way they were drafted, then once they see them play, they change the ratings the following year.