Main Site | Forum | Rules | Downloads | Wiki | Features | Podcast

NLSC Forum

Talk about NBA Live 06 here.
Post a reply

Wed Aug 31, 2005 1:33 am

if u dont agree, well... ur retarded quite frankly lol


lol omg rotf u r teh pwn let me sho u dis first do G...

Original post wrote:wade have tooo big fg

Original post wrote:t-mac had a lower fg than flash


Wade's FG > T-mac's FG.. which is what I showed. If you don't agree well... you're retarded quite frankly. Actually, you're just retarded either way.

Wed Aug 31, 2005 2:11 am

It's true, Tmac has more range, and is a better 3PT, and mid-range shooter. Wade does shoot mid-range shots though, and for the last 2 months of the season he was shooting 44% on his mid-range jumpers.

He can also hit three's, he just doesn't like to take them. Don't let his percentages decieve you. I was explaining this to someone else, that you have to understand stats before you use them. Let me quote myself:

This is why people need to understand stats. Wade shot 28.9%, but because he took very few three's, so the law of large numbers applies. Wade took 45 three's in the season, with 17-18 of those being half-court heaves at the end of quarters, and clock expiring shots. He made 3 of those let's say 17 shots. If he had taken 180 three's, those 17-18 shots would make maybe a 1-2% difference in his numbers, but with him taking only 45 three's, it makes a pretty big difference. Eliminate the 3-17 on desperation shots, and he shot 10-28, 35.7% on three's. Now, if he was taking more three's, teams would guard him more from outisde so he'd get less open looks etc, so taking about 180 three's in a season, he would likely shoot in the 32-33% range, not 28.9%.


When asked about 3PT shooting, he said he can make them, he just doesn't like to take them. Also I've seen him down the stretch shoot three's very confidently. Last year he had the olympics, so didn't have much of a summer, but this season, I'd expect him to have improved both his mid-range, and 3PT shooting.

Wed Aug 31, 2005 2:20 am

I'm not saying Wade is a better shooter, but the guy was annoyed that his FG percentage was higher than T-Mac's.... when it actually is considerably in real life.

Wed Aug 31, 2005 2:37 am

That was basically a reply to the last 3-4 posts, not just yours, but I see, I thought he was reffering to FG rating or something :lol:

Wed Aug 31, 2005 3:43 am

Jae wrote:
Wade's FG > T-mac's FG.. which is what I showed. If you don't agree well... you're retarded quite frankly. Actually, you're just retarded either way.


yeah i am so retarded that u agree with me that T-Mac is a better shooter.

haha.. u dumbass

Wed Aug 31, 2005 3:47 am

What the hell? One day you'll make a post that is somewhat legible and makes sense. You're a retard because of the 99 other posts you've made here.

Wed Aug 31, 2005 4:19 am

naciremadream wrote:
Jae wrote:
Wade's FG > T-mac's FG.. which is what I showed. If you don't agree well... you're retarded quite frankly. Actually, you're just retarded either way.


yeah i am so retarded that u agree with me that T-Mac is a better shooter.

haha.. u dumbass


Wtf, Jae is simply saying that Wade's FG percentage is higher than T-Mac's FG percentage, then you respond with, "T-Mac is a better shooter." :? I think you should rephrase your post with, "haha i am so retarded that u agree with me. T-Mac is a better shooter."

Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:26 am

t-mac is a better 3-point shooter than wade, but thats about it

Fri Sep 02, 2005 5:32 am

nbalive744 wrote:t-mac is a better 3-point shooter than wade, but thats about it


Of course. T-Mac takes way more threes than Wade and of course makes more.
Post a reply