Wed Aug 31, 2005 1:33 am
if u dont agree, well... ur retarded quite frankly lol
Original post wrote:wade have tooo big fg
Original post wrote:t-mac had a lower fg than flash
Wed Aug 31, 2005 2:11 am
This is why people need to understand stats. Wade shot 28.9%, but because he took very few three's, so the law of large numbers applies. Wade took 45 three's in the season, with 17-18 of those being half-court heaves at the end of quarters, and clock expiring shots. He made 3 of those let's say 17 shots. If he had taken 180 three's, those 17-18 shots would make maybe a 1-2% difference in his numbers, but with him taking only 45 three's, it makes a pretty big difference. Eliminate the 3-17 on desperation shots, and he shot 10-28, 35.7% on three's. Now, if he was taking more three's, teams would guard him more from outisde so he'd get less open looks etc, so taking about 180 three's in a season, he would likely shoot in the 32-33% range, not 28.9%.
Wed Aug 31, 2005 2:20 am
Wed Aug 31, 2005 2:37 am
Wed Aug 31, 2005 3:43 am
Jae wrote:
Wade's FG > T-mac's FG.. which is what I showed. If you don't agree well... you're retarded quite frankly. Actually, you're just retarded either way.
Wed Aug 31, 2005 3:47 am
Wed Aug 31, 2005 4:19 am
naciremadream wrote:Jae wrote:
Wade's FG > T-mac's FG.. which is what I showed. If you don't agree well... you're retarded quite frankly. Actually, you're just retarded either way.
yeah i am so retarded that u agree with me that T-Mac is a better shooter.
haha.. u dumbass
Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:26 am
Fri Sep 02, 2005 5:32 am
nbalive744 wrote:t-mac is a better 3-point shooter than wade, but thats about it