I was playing a game vs the Cavaliers. i was using the Seattle Sonics. at the end of the Game..Luke Ridnour has 17 Points,14 Asissts. and 6 steals. I knew for a fact, i just knew he was finna get the player of the game.
i went to the player of the game thing and they had Rashaad Lewis as the POG. he had 30 Points, 0 Rebs, 0 Assts, 0 Steals, 0 Blocks.
I personally always felt the player of the game is the person who had the best ALL Around Game/Impact, not just based purely on points. I don't like that at all.
if one player has 50 points and 0 everything else, but one player has 15 points,20 rebounds, and 10 assists i think the person with the 15-20-10 was the best player in the game.
what yall think?