Review up at OPERATIONSPORTS.COM 3/5

Talk about NBA Live 06 here.

Review up at OPERATIONSPORTS.COM 3/5

Postby Toaster on Sun Oct 02, 2005 4:52 am

http://reviews.operationsports.com/revi ... live06xbox




"BOTTOM LINE
I say this in pretty much every review that I write, but I feel the need to emphasize this point. Do not focus solely on the final score! In the end, NBA Live 06 plays a pretty good game of basketball with the right slider tweaks. Out of the box, the game is an unrealistic dunkfest, but after some slider changes, the game resembles the NBA. That said, I can’t reward EA's slow pace to fix problems with the game by rewarding this game with a high score. EA was given three years to fix the sliding, the passing and the rebounding - and it still refuses to fix these problems. With the exception of "Superstar" mode, all of the "improvements" are things that should be in any basketball video game. You shouldn’t get credit for adding fast breaks to a basketball game. You shouldn’t get credit for adding more plays to the game for the first time in five years.

Some of you may ask how I can say NBA Live 06 is a better game than NBA Live 2005 - and then give it a lower score. The reason is simple - NBA Live 06 is the game that NBA Live 2005 should have been. NBA Live 2005 should have had fast breaks, more plays and teams playing like their real-life counterparts. NBA Live 06 has all of these things (with some adjustments), but they're a year too late. Again, I simply can't reward a game company for adding things to a game that should have been included or were formerly included.

However, the bottom line is this: If you liked NBA Live 2005, you will love NBA Live 06. But if you didn’t like Live last year, then you probably won’t like it this year, either.




SCORE: 3/5" :?
User avatar
Toaster
 
Posts: 266
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2002 9:04 pm
Location: Haifa, Israel

Postby Jackal on Sun Oct 02, 2005 5:18 am

You shouldn’t get credit for adding fast breaks to a basketball game. You shouldn’t get credit for adding more plays to the game for the first time in five years.

I agree with that. They should've had these things awhile back. They had it, removed it, put it back and now they make it look like it's new.

Next year you'll be able to save in game and it'll be a new feature. Oh wells...
User avatar
Jackal
 
Posts: 14877
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2003 2:59 am

Postby tadone on Sun Oct 02, 2005 6:27 am

Totally agree with Aaron Holbert. Think what u like but EA is plain lazy or have bad game developers and I dont want to hear about how hard it is to create a good basketball game because I know it can be done plus those guys get paid for that so they should know what they are doing and do it right. EA just want to make a quick buck on basketball fans. I hate to be the guy who flames EA because I am loyal fan for almost a decade but this is just bullshit what they do. I mean all those people who develop this game didn't fuckin see the rebounding mechanism, I just can not understand how this could happen not to mention the rosters not being correct. Like Aaron Holbert said EA had so many years to fix it but they refuse to do that!
User avatar
tadone
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 6:25 am

Postby Andreas Dahl on Sun Oct 02, 2005 6:40 am

Thanks for the link, I'll post it on the main page. (y)

It was a nice review; best one so far I think. I agree with most of the stuff he wrote, and some stuff was spot on.
Image
User avatar
Andreas Dahl
 
Posts: 5970
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2002 10:04 pm
Location: Växjö, Sweden


Return to NBA Live 06

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests