Why dawg Steve Nash?

I dont know about yall but I believe the MVP of the league, Nash deserves a better rating than an 85. What do you guys think?

I think that is fair....he's not a super athlete or anything and his D is pretty mediocre....an overall rating of 85 seems very fair....

Overall has nothing to do with individual skill...

His ratings down to an 85 because he's not a good defender, not a good rebounder, not a good blocker, not a good jumper, and not a good dunker.

I think that is fair....he's not a super athlete or anything and his D is pretty mediocre....an overall rating of 85 seems very fair....

Nicely said

here we go again with the overall rating.... look people it doesnt mean so and so is better if they have a higher overall rating. it just means they are better all round player.

see my post on the thread where someone complained about dirk's overall