steve nash

Talk about NBA Live 06 here.

steve nash

Postby axe_boy on Mon Jan 16, 2006 7:19 am

why is his rating low?
User avatar
axe_boy
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 1:31 am

Postby Avrah3 on Mon Jan 16, 2006 7:21 am

why do you call it low he is in the upper 80s and what do you want him to be 99?
Bucks next champs! Go Bucks!
User avatar
Avrah3
 
Posts: 345
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 12:09 pm
Location: bucks fan center

Postby axe_boy on Mon Jan 16, 2006 7:54 am

90+ will do. his the MVP :idea:
User avatar
axe_boy
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 1:31 am

Postby Avrah3 on Mon Jan 16, 2006 7:56 am

his

i think you mean he's and also what is good at besides passing and 3s?
Bucks next champs! Go Bucks!
User avatar
Avrah3
 
Posts: 345
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 12:09 pm
Location: bucks fan center

Postby Vanny on Mon Jan 16, 2006 8:36 am

may be outside stopper will be good 4 him ;)
Image
User avatar
Vanny
 
Posts: 103
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 7:57 am

Postby axe_boy on Mon Jan 16, 2006 8:37 am

k find! :roll:
User avatar
axe_boy
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 1:31 am

Postby bigh0rt on Mon Jan 16, 2006 8:41 am

What does his overall matter? I'll never understand the infatuation that people have with Overalls. As long as each individual category is accurate, that's all that matters. Find a category that you don't agree with, and change it if need be, but Jesus Christ, it's annoying as hell to get several "Why is Player X only an 85 overall? WTF?" posts a day...
User avatar
bigh0rt
NLSC Team Member
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 9032
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: New York

Postby Jona on Mon Jan 16, 2006 1:02 pm

bigh0rt wrote:What does his overall matter? I'll never understand the infatuation that people have with Overalls. As long as each individual category is accurate, that's all that matters. Find a category that you don't agree with, and change it if need be, but Jesus Christ, it's annoying as hell to get several "Why is Player X only an 85 overall? WTF?" posts a day...


Completely agree with you there, though I don't think the problem will cease.
Jona - Rush Fan
Image
User avatar
Jona
 
Posts: 2659
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 7:41 am
Location: Santiago, Chile

Postby Andrew on Mon Jan 16, 2006 7:31 pm

I don't feel it's low. His defensive abilities do not warrant ratings that would put him up in the mid to high 90s. In any case, I do not like to place too much focus on overall ratings as it tends to mess up the individual ratings which in the end are the more important numbers.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115156
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Postby supladoako on Mon Jan 16, 2006 9:14 pm

I agree with Andrew. I believe Steve Nash's current ratings are accurate.
supladoako
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 1:59 pm

Postby air2k5 on Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:12 am

Man grow up, he is the MVP but how can you make him a outside stopper? He is not that good at stealing, I find his ratings accurate, he performs like he should.
User avatar
air2k5
 
Posts: 446
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 5:01 pm
Location: USA

Postby RKO on Sun Mar 12, 2006 8:16 am

Nash's overall is fine, you cant make him a stopper cuz he aint good at defence

duhhhhhhh...
User avatar
RKO
The Legend Killer
 
Posts: 1024
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 12:33 pm
Location: In The Office.

Postby JimRaynor55 on Fri Mar 17, 2006 6:29 am

I agree, his real ratings shouldn't be changed just to boost his overall rating. Overall ratings are meaningless; they are just calculated using a (stupid) formula that takes every rating into account. For example, Iguodala is far from a star but is highly rated because he gets a lot of help from Defensive Awareness and his athletic ratings.

That said, I think Nash is very overrated in defense. I checked his Defensive Awareness, and it's 73! Nash has a reputation as a poor to subpar defender, and stats like Defensive +/-, etc. tend to support that. I lowered his defensive rating to 50 in my own roster (no worse than some other guards in the game), and his overall was only decreased by 1 point.
JimRaynor55
 
Posts: 127
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2004 3:20 am

Postby Andrew on Fri Mar 17, 2006 9:32 am

I might not go so low as 50 but I agree that 73 is quite high given his reputation and statistical evidence. Thanks. :)
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115156
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Quazza on Sat Mar 18, 2006 2:14 am

Avrah3 wrote:
his

i think you mean he's and also what is good at besides passing and 3s?


v good inside scorer

whats his O.Awareness at?Should prolly be 99
Quazza
 
Posts: 77
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 12:58 pm

Postby Kbryant8 on Sat Mar 18, 2006 2:25 am

axe_boy wrote:90+ will do. his the MVP :idea:


ARE YOU INSANE R SMT????
90+ wtf....
80+ is good enough for him.He`s not a jordan r smt...
MVP r not,he`s not that good.
Image
LA LAKERS 2009 NBA CHAMPS!!!
My photoshop thread
User avatar
Kbryant8
CHAMPS!
 
Posts: 1864
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:02 am
Location: Estonia

Postby Andrew on Sat Mar 18, 2006 11:05 am

He needs a high offensive awareness so that he'll average a good amount of assists in simulation.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115156
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Silas on Tue Mar 21, 2006 3:48 pm

ya steve nash is not a great defender at all, in fact his defensive ratings might be a bit high, the only rating that might need boosting is quickness. To be honest i think its fine how it is though. Theres no rating for making your teammates better and being the MVP in the way that nash is.
User avatar
Silas
 
Posts: 2259
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 6:14 am
Location: Seattle Area

Postby Andrew on Tue Mar 21, 2006 3:56 pm

Only thing I'd lower at this point is defensive awareness, so no worries there.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115156
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Vanny on Mon May 08, 2006 10:00 pm

Steve Nash became MVP again .... and if compare with his previous season he scoring more with better field goals percent ..... and his rating is only 82 but was 83 in begining .... pls fix it in next roster man , Nas is MVP again :shock:
Image
User avatar
Vanny
 
Posts: 103
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 7:57 am

Postby Jugs on Mon May 08, 2006 10:29 pm

Don't you understand the logic of overall ratings?

Overall ratings determines what all of his ratings combined equal, this include offence, defence and athletic ratings. Steve Nash is a choppy defender, hence why his defence ratings are low. This highly effects his overall ratings. But he's still a great offensive player. If you learn to study player ratings, you do not have to rely on overall ratings to determine who is 'great' to use.
Jugs
 
Posts: 7442
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Geelong, Australia

Postby Andrew on Mon May 08, 2006 11:16 pm

Vanny wrote:Steve Nash became MVP again .... and if compare with his previous season he scoring more with better field goals percent ..... and his rating is only 82 but was 83 in begining .... pls fix it in next roster man , Nas is MVP again :shock:


No. There is nothing to "fix". To raise Nash's overall rating I'd need to boost his defensive ratings and he is not deserving of that. I will not boost Steve Nash's overall rating simply because he won the MVP again.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115156
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Vanny on Thu May 11, 2006 3:11 am

Hes overall was 83 , and in 1.08 version it's 82 ..... why ? whoot changes happens ?
Image
User avatar
Vanny
 
Posts: 103
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 7:57 am

Postby R.J. on Thu May 11, 2006 9:51 am

Let's see your roster...oh yeah...that's right....

Didn't we make it clear enough?
Image
User avatar
R.J.
 
Posts: 1377
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 12:29 pm

Postby Andrew on Thu May 11, 2006 5:28 pm

Vanny wrote:Hes overall was 83 , and in 1.08 version it's 82 ..... why ? whoot changes happens ?


His Defensive Awareness was decreased slightly as it was a little high for a player not considered to be better than adequate defensively.

For the last time; the overall is not the most important point to focus on when creating ratings, I'm not changing ratings just so the overall looks "better".
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115156
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia


Return to NBA Live 06

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests