How can the SA Spurs be ranked 26th in the latest roster!
Sat May 17, 2003 8:21 pm
Why are the NBA Live Rosters so out of touch with reality?
Why are the Spurs, one of the best teams in the league, always ranked in the mid twenties or lower?
Not only has this game lost all sense of realism but it seems that so have the roster updates!
This is the team that just beat the Lakers and will probably become champions again (because of Chris Webber's injury).
Could we please have some realistic rosters with close to the real thing team rankings?
Thank You
M. Calcagno
Why are the Spurs, one of the best teams in the league, always ranked in the mid twenties or lower?
Not only has this game lost all sense of realism but it seems that so have the roster updates!
This is the team that just beat the Lakers and will probably become champions again (because of Chris Webber's injury).
Could we please have some realistic rosters with close to the real thing team rankings?
Thank You
M. Calcagno
Sun May 18, 2003 6:00 am
ratings are ALWAYS messed up, always have been, always will be. If you'll notice the default roster has Vancouver at 13th or 14th I believe.
Sun May 18, 2003 1:50 pm
First of all, this section is for gripes about the game, not issues with the roster patch. Please use the appropriate section to provide feedback about the NLSC rosters.
As I explained in my email, it's difficult to get the overall team rankings realistic without making players overrated and underrated - especially during the season, when players go on the injured list. I will try to find a balance when I'm fixing up the ratings this offseason.
As I explained in my email, it's difficult to get the overall team rankings realistic without making players overrated and underrated - especially during the season, when players go on the injured list. I will try to find a balance when I'm fixing up the ratings this offseason.