12 Minute quarter ROSTER PATCH in making.

by **Filip** on Sun Aug 17, 2003 8:44 pm

Haha, you think that my blocks in my roster are way to high, fuck you got twice as much :lol:

!

your roster

Code: Select all: Rebounds 75 120 Off. Rebounds 4 46 Def. Rebounds 71 74

my roster

Code: Select all: Rebounds 39 61 Off. Rebounds 5 20 Def. Rebounds 34 41

But the blocks are real good! Much better than mine.
But I hav better scoring and FG%,

http://dynamic2.gamespy.com/~nbalive/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=6372

by **elwudl** on Sun Aug 17, 2003 9:18 pm

Do you want to make a contest? Silly...

The roster I sent to some people contained only three teams updated:
Seattle, San Antonio, Denver

I can't help when people don't want to read the readme...so there come crappy stats. Or do you think I was simply creating them by thinking them out?

I think I will not release one. I said they should play on superstar and they play on all-star.

I said, there are only the Sonics, Spurs and Wizards updated and someone plays with the Jazz and the Raptors, teams that weren't updated at the moment I zipped the roster that's out there...

Why don't you read the readme? Otherwise all the work makes no sense....

Look at my stats, Portland-Jazz, they are good...

by **Filip** on Sun Aug 17, 2003 9:43 pm

Nah, take it easy man. I don't want to make a contest, I was just comparing a bit.

But sorry if you got offended or something

.

by **The Big Racist** on Sun Aug 17, 2003 9:50 pm

Neusorger wrote:The roster I sent to some people contained only three teams updated:
Seattle, San Antonio, Washington

utah and raptors were update they didnt have malone and stockton+raps had Bosh :roll:

seemed pretty updated to me

Neusorger wrote:I think I will not release one. I said they should play on superstar and they play on all-star.

I played on the Superstar and it was easier than with default rosters

Neusorger wrote:Why don't you read the readme? Otherwise all the work makes no sense....

well i read it but not completley....

by **elwudl** on Sun Aug 17, 2003 10:00 pm

Then I do not know why you get such crappy stats. Every full game I played hat not more than 90 FGAs for one team. I didn't get 172 or such a shitty high amount.

BTW, why don't you read the readme? Do you think I wrote them just because I was boring?

by **Filip** on Mon Aug 18, 2003 12:14 am

Mr roster is also made for superstar diff, but that's almost all. You can almost play like normally and get realistic stats.

by **elwudl** on Mon Aug 18, 2003 1:26 am

Slam harder wrote:Mr roster is also made for superstar diff, but that's almost all. You can almost play like normally and get realistic stats.

Sorry, but I do not understand, what you want to say! :oops:

by **The Big Racist** on Mon Aug 18, 2003 5:07 am

Neusorger wrote:Then I do not know why you get such crappy stats. Every full game I played hat not more than 90 FGAs for one team. I didn't get 172 or such a shitty high amount.

BTW, why don't you read the readme? Do you think I wrote them just because I was boring?

this roster just doesnt suit with my game and i said i read the readme file but not completley

by **elwudl** on Mon Aug 18, 2003 5:34 am

But I wrote in the readme you need a special style of playing...

I think I will patch the roster only for my own.

by **Dramacydal** on Mon Aug 18, 2003 6:44 am

probably u should do that cause all those haters out there dont seem very satisfied...

by **kneeknoe** on Mon Aug 18, 2003 12:01 pm

hey can i try these rosters? my e-mail is nino_bee@hotmail.com

by **elwudl** on Fri Aug 29, 2003 1:25 am

Tweaked again a lil bit.

Me was Sacramento.

Code: Select all: First Quarter Dallas Sacramento Points 30 24 Benchpoints 2 0 Field-Goals 12/25 10/21 Field-Goal % 48,0% 47,6% 3pts 4/7 1/6 3pt % 57,1% 16,7% Free-Throws 2/2 3/3 Free-Throw % 100,0% 100,0% Rebounds 9 14 Off. Rebounds 2 4 Def. Rebounds 7 10 Blocks 0 0 Steals 6 0 Assists 8 7 Turnovers 1 7 Fouls 4 2

Website · by **madskillionaire** on Fri Aug 29, 2003 5:46 am

well obviously for a first quarter scores were high, but the stats itself seem to be real...if only '03 had sliders like '04 will...then rosters would be so, so much easier....ah well, trying is good

by **elwudl** on Fri Aug 29, 2003 6:01 am

Oh man...I can tell you something about sliders...
I got NHL 2002, it has sliders...but sliders do not make any sense in this game. I hope they have other sliders in NBA 04! :roll:

I finished a game at the moment, playing with the Cavs against the Kings. Lost 92-107, had been in front 52-48 by half-time! All stats were good, the only thing that bothered my again was the high amount of turn-overs I had.

by **Ruff Ryder** on Fri Aug 29, 2003 12:29 pm

I finished a game at the moment, playing with the Cavs against the Kings. Lost 92-107, had been in front 52-48 by half-time! All stats were good, the only thing that bothered my again was the high amount of turn-overs I had.

Well that always happens(TO's). Stats sound ok.

by **elwudl** on Tue Sep 02, 2003 1:16 am

Sorry guys, but after all, the same crappy stats appear more and more again. I thaught I could handle with the ratings to get a 12 min game...but finally, thank you EA! The more I try the more I hate the game! I won't releas a roster...I will just download now Andrew's roster and play 7-8 min quarters like I did before or I will just wait until NBA Live 04 will be released,

EA thank you for a crappy game! :cry:

Website · by **madskillionaire** on Tue Sep 02, 2003 6:03 am

the thing is, ratings arent always the solution...thats why they finally decide to take the idea from Madden, and add sliders, now realism is possible :wink:

(they sounded corny, didnt it? :lol:

)

by **elwudl** on Tue Sep 02, 2003 6:17 am

madskillionaire wrote:the thing is, ratings arent always the solution...thats why they finally decide to take the idea from Madden, and add sliders, now realism is possible (they sounded corny, didnt it? )

And because of that NBA Live 2003 has no realism IMO

12 Minute quarter ROSTER PATCH in making.

Who is online