Strange computergenerated rookies, I love them LOL
Thu Jun 03, 2004 6:10 am
What do you think of the computergenerated rookies? First, I have to say that I use a tweaked roster...my best players have a FG of slightly above 70. Let's say 72, lots of players have 64 and something. Blocking ratings are 58 the most...but then, there are such strange players...
O. Olumide has 61 overall (which is low average in my roster, the stars have 70-80) but has 99 for def.rebounding and of.rebounding.
Then there is a rookie, called Boniface Daniels, with a low overall ratings, didn't play a game, was waived by his team, is a free agent, no-one wants him. But he has a FG of 77 -> top in the league! And blocking is 65, also the best in the league! Theo Ratliff has 61 or something.
This player has 77 FG and the best inside-scoring-rating in the league but a shooting range of 10'
Strange, strange.
I just love such players, the excitement when the new rookies are created, I tweak them and scroll through them...some center is a giant, he is tall, he is good but has 62 and 65 in rebounding
Not to forget the pointguards who are slow as hell.
O. Olumide has 61 overall (which is low average in my roster, the stars have 70-80) but has 99 for def.rebounding and of.rebounding.
Then there is a rookie, called Boniface Daniels, with a low overall ratings, didn't play a game, was waived by his team, is a free agent, no-one wants him. But he has a FG of 77 -> top in the league! And blocking is 65, also the best in the league! Theo Ratliff has 61 or something.
This player has 77 FG and the best inside-scoring-rating in the league but a shooting range of 10'
Strange, strange.
I just love such players, the excitement when the new rookies are created, I tweak them and scroll through them...some center is a giant, he is tall, he is good but has 62 and 65 in rebounding
Not to forget the pointguards who are slow as hell.