Trump 2016

Other video games, TV shows, movies, general chit-chat...this is an all-purpose off-topic board where you can talk about anything that doesn't have its own dedicated section.

Do you support Trump's views?

No
20
74%
Yes
4
15%
Undecided
3
11%
 
Total votes : 27

Trump 2016

Postby [Q] on Wed Mar 16, 2016 1:24 pm

Image

Anybody following Donald Trump's campaign? So many closet racists have flocked to him and applauded him for "speaking his mind". To me he's undoing a lot of progress we've made in this country where white people fear saying anything about other races for fear of being labeled a racist. It's a really bad thing for this country to have such a big and well-known figure show people it's okay to attack and insult large groups of people that are simply different from you. His slogan is "Make America Great Again" which is a great play on his part, but to me it's more like "Make America Openly Racist Again". As a person of color in this country, that's something that I obviously cannot support.
Image
User avatar
[Q]
NBA Live 18 Optimist
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 11472
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 8:20 am
Location: Westside, the best side

Re: Trump 2016

Postby Andrew on Wed Mar 16, 2016 1:35 pm

Please don't, America. Please don't.

The funny thing is, he goes on about freedom of speech and all that, but he objects to anyone who speaks out against his views, even attempting to sue Bill Maher and describing a desire to change the libel laws. It's very much a case of "one rule for me, one rule for everyone else", a classic example of being able to dish it out but not take it. The hypocrisy on top of the some of the hateful points of view and fearmongering is very troubling.
NLSC Webmaster/Administrator
Image
Contact: Email | Twitter
Release Threads: NBA Live 08 | NBA Live 07 | NBA Live 06 | NBA Live 2005 | NBA Live 2004
Story Threads: NBA 2K13 | NBA Live 06 (Part 2) | NBA Live 06 (HOF) | NBA Live 2004 (HOF)
NLSC: Podcast | The Friday Five | Monday Tip-Off | Wayback Wednesday | 20th Anniversary of NBA Live | Facebook | Twitter | YouTube


Support The NLSC Hosting Fund: Patreon | GoFundMe

Image
Like my work? Want to help out with the NLSC Hosting Fund? Please consider leaving a tip!
User avatar
Andrew
Orange Juice, haha!
Administrator
 
Posts: 99560
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Trump 2016

Postby Kevin on Wed Mar 16, 2016 2:17 pm

You americans are anti-Trump when on the internet but a supporter of him in real life. Seriously, if a large portion of the USA hates him why does he almost always wins the polls?
Image

Main Modding Threads: NBA 2K16|NBA 2K15|NBA 2K14
Story Thread: Montreal Ravens (A 1996 Franchise Story)

"The new NLSC Webmaster should be either Bobby Simmons, Yao Ming, Jason Kapono, Michael Doleac, maybe Luis Scola or Josh Powell."
- The one and only, CoryMach7
User avatar
Kevin
Lakers - I mean Kobe fan.
 
Posts: 7827
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2013 9:47 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: Trump 2016

Postby [Q] on Wed Mar 16, 2016 2:19 pm

Yes, a lot of his tactics have been very hypocritical, which is very frustrating. To fly off the handle and say something about Hispanics is okay, but denouncing the KKK? That's too far for Trump.
Image
User avatar
[Q]
NBA Live 18 Optimist
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 11472
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 8:20 am
Location: Westside, the best side

Re: Trump 2016

Postby Andrew on Wed Mar 16, 2016 2:32 pm

Kevin wrote:You americans are anti-Trump when on the internet but a supporter of him in real life. Seriously, if a large portion of the USA hates him why does he almost always wins the polls?


That's a confusing assertion, as it assumes that the same people who oppose him in online discussions and comment sections are in fact supporting him in the polls, as opposed to there being separate outspoken groups who hold one opinion or the other.

It would seem that a lot of people prefer him to the other Republican candidates. When it comes to the election itself, I've read that polls indicate he'd lose the election itself to Hilary Clinton. That's not quite the same as a lot of the country being on his side, though it seems a lot of people indeed are.
NLSC Webmaster/Administrator
Image
Contact: Email | Twitter
Release Threads: NBA Live 08 | NBA Live 07 | NBA Live 06 | NBA Live 2005 | NBA Live 2004
Story Threads: NBA 2K13 | NBA Live 06 (Part 2) | NBA Live 06 (HOF) | NBA Live 2004 (HOF)
NLSC: Podcast | The Friday Five | Monday Tip-Off | Wayback Wednesday | 20th Anniversary of NBA Live | Facebook | Twitter | YouTube


Support The NLSC Hosting Fund: Patreon | GoFundMe

Image
Like my work? Want to help out with the NLSC Hosting Fund? Please consider leaving a tip!
User avatar
Andrew
Orange Juice, haha!
Administrator
 
Posts: 99560
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Trump 2016

Postby Cpt(K) on Wed Mar 16, 2016 3:24 pm

I wouldn't necessarily condemn Trump's candidacy for the endorsements, or praise he has received from unpopular groups. I don't like the idea of someone who has contempt for me, on the basis of skin, endorsing any candidate. I'm pulling for Ted Cruz actually, and having watched the election cycle when I have had the time, it becomes more clear to me it is irresponsible to exalt any particular candidate as untouchable.

My browsing on social media has encountered many people who are vehemently opposed, but also in favor of a Trump presidency. Unfortunately the dialog has been reduced to a repetitive exchange of who's worse than the other. The conversations aren't usually constructive, and virtually the only interaction between pro-Trump, and anti-Trump people is barbarous language. My time studying George Orwell, which was brief, gave me a new appreciation for discussion.

He has 5-6 rules for writing (outlined in the essay",Politics and the English Language "), which I think everyone ought to try to utilize. My English professor for that particular course has probably been my second-most favorite, behind my elderly math professor who's going on 50 years of teaching, who I've had for two semesters. That English professor of mine, once said something like", Orwell's rules for writing are so applicable today, because communication is becoming less effective, and when two or more parties cannot communicate their differences to each other in a civil matter-- the alternative is war."
User avatar
Cpt(K)
 
Posts: 620
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 2:49 am
Location: Purple area of Illinois

Re: Trump 2016

Postby [Q] on Wed Mar 16, 2016 4:27 pm

Kevin wrote:You americans are anti-Trump when on the internet but a supporter of him in real life. Seriously, if a large portion of the USA hates him why does he almost always wins the polls?

You have to understand that he is a Republican and there are a lot of Republicans stuck in the old ways that agree with what he is doing.
Image
User avatar
[Q]
NBA Live 18 Optimist
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 11472
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 8:20 am
Location: Westside, the best side

Re: Trump 2016

Postby Phil89 on Wed Mar 16, 2016 5:07 pm

I just don't get it. He is a fraud, a compulsive liar and a racist. Who are these people that are voting for him?

John Oliver did a brilliant piece on his show highlighting Trump's hypocrisy. Anyone who hasn't seen it should check it out.
My Stories
Live 10 - Thunder I, Thunder II
2k13 - Wizards / 2k15 - Sixers / 2k16 - Sixers 2k17 - Suns
User avatar
Phil89
 
Posts: 5281
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:27 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Trump 2016

Postby bigh0rt on Wed Mar 16, 2016 10:14 pm

American politics are a very funny thing. Trump is benefiting largely from, and I may step in and out of line here I'm sure, there being no other real viable candidate from the Republican party this go 'round. Carson, Cruz, Rubio, et al were all laughable candidates, allowing him to gain early traction. He also panders to the lowest common denominator which, as much as I hate to admit it, engulfs a great portion of America, especially in all of the fly-over states in the 'heart' of the country, as well as the south. He does not resonate well in the Northeast or West coast which are typically more largely populated with, for lack of a better word, thinkers. I realize that is probably offensive to people to live in the aforementioned places, but I'm of course not talking about everybody, and just making blanket statements which I believe to be largely true.

Trump also does a very good job at enticing excitement without having to say anything of substance. People like this. They can get behind it. When he says "Make America Great Again", people like the way that sounds, even if they have no idea what it means. It doesn't matter to them. They can agree they want America to be great. Again, this is the lowest common denominator we're talking about here. There are several other buzz-type phrases he repeats over and over with the same reaction. He presents the tough guy/bully mentality and presents it as being a 'winner', and people want to be 'winners'. It's quite interesting to follow, to be honest. The short side being the notion of him actually winning the presidency.

The way things are shaping up with the Republican primaries, it does not look like Trump will get enough delegates to get the automatic nomination, and many indications are that the party itself does not want him to be their nominee; so that when the time comes to choose their nominee, they will not select him. Again, this is just one possible scenario, but it is one that seems to make sense given the information we have.

If that scenario occurs, and Trump wins the populist vote and is not selected by the Republican party, it is likely that he runs as an Independent, ruining any Republican candidate's chance of winning the election. In this instance, whatever Democratic candidate goes on (looks like Hilary Clinton is running away with it at this point) will go on to a pretty easy victory.

If the Republican party does nominate Trump, then it will be a closer race between he and Clinton, but most early exit polls show that she would also defeat him in the general presidential election. In my opinion, she would only gain a greater edge over the next year than she's already got (and to be clear, I am far from a supporter of hers).

It's an interesting time for American politics. There comes a point where 'interesting' fast approaches 'dangerous' though, and it stops being funny. It's not a reality show, it's a determination for who will lead our nation. Thankfully we have a system in place that largely minimizes the damage any lone president can do, so whoever ends up in office, the day to day life of almost all Americans is unlikely to change by any real margin.

Again, this is all just my insight based on information that I have taken in, opinions that I have, etc. It is far from gospel.
Image
Image
User avatar
bigh0rt
NLSC Team Member
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 8808
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: New York

Re: Trump 2016

Postby Andrew on Wed Mar 16, 2016 11:57 pm

That lines up pretty well with an article I read yesterday: How Trump Happened

It delves into some other issues as well, but it comes down to him appealing to a large group of disenchanted Americans, who desire change and someone to blame. He's giving them that, along with a catchy slogan that ignites patriotic feelings and a sense of hope, even if there isn't much substance to it. As you said, it sounds good to anyone who feels the country has lost its way, and so they don't really question the "how", or fact-check anything that's being said. They're not happy, so obviously America is in trouble, and he's going to fix it, because he said as much.

Since the whole thing has an air of professional wrestling promos about it, it seems only appropriate that legendary wrestling manager and promoter Jim Cornette weighs in on the situation. It's a Cornette shoot, so an obligatory NSFW language warning.

phpBB [video]
NLSC Webmaster/Administrator
Image
Contact: Email | Twitter
Release Threads: NBA Live 08 | NBA Live 07 | NBA Live 06 | NBA Live 2005 | NBA Live 2004
Story Threads: NBA 2K13 | NBA Live 06 (Part 2) | NBA Live 06 (HOF) | NBA Live 2004 (HOF)
NLSC: Podcast | The Friday Five | Monday Tip-Off | Wayback Wednesday | 20th Anniversary of NBA Live | Facebook | Twitter | YouTube


Support The NLSC Hosting Fund: Patreon | GoFundMe

Image
Like my work? Want to help out with the NLSC Hosting Fund? Please consider leaving a tip!
User avatar
Andrew
Orange Juice, haha!
Administrator
 
Posts: 99560
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Trump 2016

Postby bigh0rt on Thu Mar 17, 2016 12:09 am

There's also that, as well. People are very jaded about the political system as well. Trump represents an 'outsider', and not someone who is just pretending to be one, like many politicians do. He's a genuine, non-political outsider who is winning a major party's primary despite every attempt by the party itself and their associated media outlets to do everything within their power to do so. In that respect, there's something certainly admirable about it. People believe Trump "tells is straight", and isn't just feeding them political rhetoric nonsense that they're used to having shoved down their throats. I can certainly understand why one would view that as a breath of fresh air. They may not agree with what Trump is saying, necessarily, but at least he's saying it, instead of just thinking it like the other candidates, is what I imagine at least part of them think.

I'm too young to remember, despite being alive for it, but apparently there was a lot of similar sentiment from both sides of the aisle when Ronald Reagan ran and won the presidency. Depending on who you ask, he is labeled as one of the most productive or most detrimental presidents in American history; extremely polarizing, just like Trump.

My main is not even with Trump himself, who I think doesn't truly believe a lot of what he's saying, but knows that it grabs headlines, and votes, and keeps him in the spotlight, and thus, the lead. It's how blindly and grotesquely the American people seem to follow his lead. Beating up protesters, saying they can't wait until he's President so they can just kill them (the 1st Amendment is for suckers anyway, I guess), taking pride in the notion of torture, and the potential to commit war crimes that violate the Geneva Convention. It makes me thank God that I don't live in an area where that train of thought is considered normal or even acceptable. Sure, we've got them here, but they're few and far between, and generally looked down upon (whether that's right or wrong).

In all honesty, I think Ted Cruz is a much scarier person than Trump. I think he truly believes the things he says, down to his core. Which is terrifying. Trump I think is just playing the role he thinks he needs to in order to get to the White House. Neither of them are real viable candidates to be President, though, and I don't think either of them really stand a chance at threatening to win against Hilary. It will be interesting to see how the Debates all go, ultimately, once the nominees are chosen, and to see if Trump ends up running as an Independent if he is not chosen as the Republican candidate. Again, it's all must watch television, but at the same time depressing considering the gravity that the decision really holds in terms of choosing our leader and representative of our nation.
Image
Image
User avatar
bigh0rt
NLSC Team Member
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 8808
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: New York

Re: Trump 2016

Postby Cpt(K) on Thu Mar 17, 2016 8:33 am

I agree that the sensationalism around his candidacy does contribute to, or at some degree, propels his campaign forward. As bigh0rt stated, it is largely in part, because of unwitting voters. I would contend some, not all, and perhaps not most, but definitely a portion of the voters who held President Obama in such high regard have migrated to Trump. There are similarities I believe are worth noting. I cannot say that every emotion-driven voter went towards Obama in 2008, anymore than I can say every emotion-driven voter is going for Trump this coming election. Media coverage certainly plays an important role, but it is an unfulfilled one. Journalism.

I'm currently behind Cruz at the moment, and I have to say a couple of the things he says I've conceded are ultimately the routine pandering statements everyone running for President makes. If you were to ask me, there are still many supporters who are critical of their preferred nominee. Thomas Sowell, with a grain of salt, I consider having demonstrated the objectivity many voters should practice each election they participate in. He was critical of Cruz, before endorsing him, and it maintains that Sowell isn't head over heels for this candidate, or any. A demeanor more people should have . . . instead of inadvertently swearing allegiance to their dear leader.

There's nothing more satisfying than having a thorough investigation of a candidate come to fruition when deciding who to vote for. Last evening I cast my vote (Cruz), and responsibly, in my opinion, abstained from any other elected positions, I have not come to an informed decision of. When I look at the resume of Ted Cruz, it wasn't the sheer amount of accolades he's earned or received, but rather the specific
relation of them. They appear tailored for someone who is becoming familiar with serving at elected positions.


My only fear with Cruz, is that he turns out to be someone who he's not. Running on a conservative platform is okay, but serving everyone including those at the center, or more to the left is even better. He promises this, however, I worry as many others would that he's be more partisan. It would be a little conspiratorial of me to suggest he could've just been groomed for this point of time (Illuminati! :lol: ). At least he's identified, what political stances or principles he's running with. The only error I can think of, is the assumption that he'll hold true to them, when he, like the other candidates is only human.


Whereas with Trump, as stated above me, he's literally saying whatever he can. Hillary is actually to a degree imitating Sander's message (although one could contend socialism, or some pillars of it, were already present in both candidates to begin with), the democrat race is between a loud socialist, and a closet socialist. It is comforting to know we have a constitutional republic with some democratic elements, rather than a mob-rule democracy, or despotism. Whatever the outcome, the limitations on the President should curtail too much damage a Trump, Hillary, Sanders, or Cruz could inflict.


I'm crossing my fingers, hoping for a Cruz presidency, with a better future. After all, that is what everyone wants. Rather than go into the useless false dilemma, which is persistently peddled in the media with intellectually lazy, and ultimately dishonest messages like this:

If you don't vote for Trump, you're a cuckservative! -- says someone ignorant of Trump's past political dabbling, which is double-dipping for the lack of a better term
If you don't vote for Cruz, you're not a patriot! -- says someone who fallaciously asserts no other candidate cares for the country
If you don't vote for Hillary, well, you're a raci- err a sexist! -- says someone, who can't decide if your one, the other, or both
If you don't vote for Sanders, you're . . . . uh, greedy! -- says someone, with no knowledge of the origins of socialism
If you don-- never mind, Rubio and Kasich need to go home.

phpBB [video]


Likewise, my words aren't Gospel either. I come from a "left of center" political family, and I happen to be the weird one that leans right of center. When voting last evening with some of my family, the expression on the face of the woman in front of me, when hearing "Republican" after hearing the party preference "Democrat" several times, was oddly hilarious. Not every family is monolithic. Although, it may have had more to do with the anomaly, where a minority goes against the grain. Needless to say, I'm not a party loyalist, and saying "Republican" was a sort-of-spite/jab at my actual party hardline relatives. Who have become accustomed to labeling Republicans a plethora of pejoratives, just as their dear leaders would have them do. (N)
User avatar
Cpt(K)
 
Posts: 620
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 2:49 am
Location: Purple area of Illinois

Re: Trump 2016

Postby Axel on Thu Mar 17, 2016 11:08 am

I voted for him and I'm gay and my partner is an immigrant. If my partner could vote, he would have voted for Trump also.

If the first thing you can say about Trump is "racist", it's obvious you only watch CNN and MSNBC and are in fact low information voter (if you even vote at all). He's definitely the best option we have from either side.
User avatar
Axel
 
Posts: 2843
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 9:46 am
Location: North Carolina

Re: Trump 2016

Postby Phil89 on Fri Mar 18, 2016 1:25 am

Andrew wrote:It delves into some other issues as well, but it comes down to him appealing to a large group of disenchanted Americans, who desire change and someone to blame. He's giving them that, along with a catchy slogan that ignites patriotic feelings and a sense of hope, even if there isn't much substance to it. As you said, it sounds good to anyone who feels the country has lost its way, and so they don't really question the "how", or fact-check anything that's being said. They're not happy, so obviously America is in trouble, and he's going to fix it, because he said as much.

The similarities between the current Trump phenomenon and what happened in 1930's Germany are quite disturbing. Times of hardship usually create the perfect conditions for the more extreme politicians to spread their message and become more popular.

Coming off of Germany's loss in WW1 and the stock market crash of 1929 Hitler and the Nazis tapped into a sense of disenchantment in Germany and he promised to rebuild the country to be a powerhouse in Europe again. To allow the people to regain pride in being German again. Trump's rhetoric is no different. His promise to "make America great again" is just a hollow patriotic slogan that has no substance behind it. It just sounds good to those voters who want things to be like they were in the "good old days" when minorities had no rights and the country was isolated from the troubles of the rest of the world.

Hitler utilised the myth that the Jews were responsible for Germany losing WW1 to gain support from disenchanted army veterans and impoverished German civilians. Trump is doing the same thing by scapegoating Mexicans as rapists and criminals and calling all Muslims terrorists. He is sensationalising the threat and is gaining a lot of support from ignorant bigots. David Duke for example.

His encouraging of his supporters to physically attack protesters is also worrying. It's the same thing the SA troops did for the Nazis when they were coming into power. Suppressing the voices of anyone who oppose them because they are "wrong", "stupid" or "traitors". Trump's first reaction to someone who doesn't agree with him is to insult them and bully them. And people really want this man representing them on the world stage?
My Stories
Live 10 - Thunder I, Thunder II
2k13 - Wizards / 2k15 - Sixers / 2k16 - Sixers 2k17 - Suns
User avatar
Phil89
 
Posts: 5281
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:27 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Trump 2016

Postby bigh0rt on Fri Mar 18, 2016 2:49 am

Phil89 wrote:
Andrew wrote:It delves into some other issues as well, but it comes down to him appealing to a large group of disenchanted Americans, who desire change and someone to blame. He's giving them that, along with a catchy slogan that ignites patriotic feelings and a sense of hope, even if there isn't much substance to it. As you said, it sounds good to anyone who feels the country has lost its way, and so they don't really question the "how", or fact-check anything that's being said. They're not happy, so obviously America is in trouble, and he's going to fix it, because he said as much.

The similarities between the current Trump phenomenon and what happened in 1930's Germany are quite disturbing. Times of hardship usually create the perfect conditions for the more extreme politicians to spread their message and become more popular.

Coming off of Germany's loss in WW1 and the stock market crash of 1929 Hitler and the Nazis tapped into a sense of disenchantment in Germany and he promised to rebuild the country to be a powerhouse in Europe again. To allow the people to regain pride in being German again. Trump's rhetoric is no different. His promise to "make America great again" is just a hollow patriotic slogan that has no substance behind it. It just sounds good to those voters who want things to be like they were in the "good old days" when minorities had no rights and the country was isolated from the troubles of the rest of the world.

Hitler utilised the myth that the Jews were responsible for Germany losing WW1 to gain support from disenchanted army veterans and impoverished German civilians. Trump is doing the same thing by scapegoating Mexicans as rapists and criminals and calling all Muslims terrorists. He is sensationalising the threat and is gaining a lot of support from ignorant bigots. David Duke for example.

His encouraging of his supporters to physically attack protesters is also worrying. It's the same thing the SA troops did for the Nazis when they were coming into power. Suppressing the voices of anyone who oppose them because they are "wrong", "stupid" or "traitors". Trump's first reaction to someone who doesn't agree with him is to insult them and bully them. And people really want this man representing them on the world stage?

I have enough belief in the checks and balances system of the American government to prevent anything this horrific or monumental from happening, in an absolute worst case scenario. I like to think that on some level the world as a whole has learned from past transgressions. A lot of what you say has plenty of merit, though, and is certainly concerning, and on a deeper level, saddening to see fellow countrymen so gung ho in support over. As I said in a previous post, many of the supporters trouble me substantially more than Trump himself does. Having these people share a nation with me, stand side by side with me, etc., in the year 2016, is a shocking revelation. Again, the media does a good job of blowing it even further out of proportion than it is, because it = ratings, but the fact that there's anything of that nature at all to even twist or misconstrue is disheartening.

As I said previously, I don't see the Republican party nominating Trump, as he projects to fall short of the necessary number of delegates needed to get the automatic bid. And he's certainly not a threat to win the presidency as a third party candidate, because this country doesn't quite seem to be on board with putting a third party candidate in the White House regardless of who they are. So, if he were to run as an Independent, all he would do is steal some of Hilary Clinton's votes, and a ton of whatever candidate the Republican party does send forward's votes, and let Hilary walk into office. Which is a troubling thought in and of itself, as well.

As always, the good news is that our president (whomever it ultimately ends up being) is a far less important cog in the machine than many seem to believe, or the media outlets want you to think. It is frustrating to no end on some levels, because it delays progress from being made at more than a snail's pace, but is a necessary stop gap from allowing something catastrophic from potentially happening.
Image
Image
User avatar
bigh0rt
NLSC Team Member
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 8808
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: New York

Re: Trump 2016

Postby Axel on Fri Mar 18, 2016 6:45 am

bigh0rt wrote:American politics are a very funny thing. Trump is benefiting largely from, and I may step in and out of line here I'm sure, there being no other real viable candidate from the Republican party this go 'round. Carson, Cruz, Rubio, et al were all laughable candidates, allowing him to gain early traction. He also panders to the lowest common denominator which, as much as I hate to admit it, engulfs a great portion of America, especially in all of the fly-over states in the 'heart' of the country, as well as the south. He does not resonate well in the Northeast or West coast which are typically more largely populated with, for lack of a better word, thinkers. I realize that is probably offensive to people to live in the aforementioned places, but I'm of course not talking about everybody, and just making blanket statements which I believe to be largely true.


New Hampshire Trump 35%, Kasich 15%
Nevada Trump 45.9%, Rubio 23.9, Cruz 21.4
Massachusetts Trump 49.3, Kasich 18.0, Rubio 17.9
Vermont Trump 32.7, Kasich 30.4, Rubio 19.3
Hawaii Trump 42.4, Cruz 32.7, Rubio 13.1

The only Northeastern state Trump has lost was Maine, which is a caucus where independents can't vote. Trump will sweep most of the NE easily. Kasich is only there to steal some delegates from Trump, because Cruz has little appeal there.

The way things are shaping up with the Republican primaries, it does not look like Trump will get enough delegates to get the automatic nomination, and many indications are that the party itself does not want him to be their nominee; so that when the time comes to choose their nominee, they will not select him. Again, this is just one possible scenario, but it is one that seems to make sense given the information we have.

If that scenario occurs, and Trump wins the populist vote and is not selected by the Republican party, it is likely that he runs as an Independent, ruining any Republican candidate's chance of winning the election. In this instance, whatever Democratic candidate goes on (looks like Hilary Clinton is running away with it at this point) will go on to a pretty easy victory.

If the Republican party does nominate Trump, then it will be a closer race between he and Clinton, but most early exit polls show that she would also defeat him in the general presidential election. In my opinion, she would only gain a greater edge over the next year than she's already got (and to be clear, I am far from a supporter of hers).


Indeed the Republican base is conspiring to get Trump out, but luckily enough voters thus far haven't been fooled by their sham candidates - Bush, Rubio, Kasich. Cruz supporters need to get on the Trump train, because I'm worried Kasich will get the nomination in a corrupted convention which will obviously seal the election for Hillary Clinton.

It's a shame how many people bring up the Hitler comparisons. Are they still teaching the Holocaust in schools these days? Do people even know what it is? Securing our border is not the same as ethnic cleansing nor genocide. Also, Ted Cruz has said the same with respect to deporting illegals, and has also claimed the water boarding is not torture. Why is there no vilification campaign against him? Oh, because he has no chance of usurping the Republican Party's control over the election process.

Trump is really the only guy out there who has the ability to beat Hillary Clinton, he just needs the Republican establishment off his back. It's too bad they want complete control over the voting process and don't give a shit about the voters.
User avatar
Axel
 
Posts: 2843
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 9:46 am
Location: North Carolina

Re: Trump 2016

Postby bigh0rt on Fri Mar 18, 2016 7:16 am

Axel wrote:
bigh0rt wrote:American politics are a very funny thing. Trump is benefiting largely from, and I may step in and out of line here I'm sure, there being no other real viable candidate from the Republican party this go 'round. Carson, Cruz, Rubio, et al were all laughable candidates, allowing him to gain early traction. He also panders to the lowest common denominator which, as much as I hate to admit it, engulfs a great portion of America, especially in all of the fly-over states in the 'heart' of the country, as well as the south. He does not resonate well in the Northeast or West coast which are typically more largely populated with, for lack of a better word, thinkers. I realize that is probably offensive to people to live in the aforementioned places, but I'm of course not talking about everybody, and just making blanket statements which I believe to be largely true.


New Hampshire Trump 35%, Kasich 15%
Nevada Trump 45.9%, Rubio 23.9, Cruz 21.4
Massachusetts Trump 49.3, Kasich 18.0, Rubio 17.9
Vermont Trump 32.7, Kasich 30.4, Rubio 19.3
Hawaii Trump 42.4, Cruz 32.7, Rubio 13.1

I was referring to amongs the general population there. The only state listed there he stands a chance of carrying against Clinton is New Hampshire; a state that hasn't gone for a Republican presidential candidate since 2000. Romney was from Massachusetts and didn't win it. He has a home in New Hampshire and spends considerable time there, and didn't win there. Now, Trump is resonating with the population much better than Romney did, but he's still unlikely to win any of those states. Hawaii is largely a blue state, as is Nevada, as are really the rest. Hilary Clinton wins all of those states no matter who she faces.

Trump would certainly be a much bigger Wild Card with respect to projecting how states would go, versus other Republican candidates presently and in recent history, so it's much tougher to project. I really don't think he stands a chance at beating Clinton, though. I don't think any of the Republican candidates do.

As for the Holocaust rhetoric, it's just as egregious to brush it off and dismiss it entirely as it is to lean on it as if we're in the middle of it and he's Hitler Jr. As I said previously, I don't see anything remotely close as even being within the realm of possibilities; however it's certainly concerning to be able to draw such easy parallels as well, without even the help of the media throwing it in our faces. If I were a Hispanic or Muslim American, here legally, doing nothing wrong, I certainly know the thought of him in office would not sit well with me. I'm not comfortable with that thought. Maybe it's unjustified, I don't know, but I don't think any group doing nothing wrong should have reason to be worried about a specific person being in power. You can claim they shouldn't be concerned, but I don't believe that to be true. Again, the true people who have worried me throughout the process are my fellow Americans.

All i know is there isn't another candidate who gives me such reservations (Cruz gives me many, for many other reasons, as do Clinton and Sanders -- mountains of them -- we've got maybe the worst cast of candidates I've ever seen. Has to be the worst in my lifetime.), and Trump has given me not a single reason to believe that he is capable of doing a capable job of leading this country. Not one. The only positive thing he brings to the table is that he's not (on the surface, at least) in the pocket of large corporations, or in debt to them for favors and such. That's it. I certainly don't want him dealing with foreign affairs, consorting with foreign leaders in matters of diplomacy, or acting as a representative for me (not that any of the others get me in a tizzy, either) on a global scale. There's mountains of other snippets that are huge red flags, as I mentioned in my initial post on the subject, with respect to blatantly saying you'd have no problem operating outside of international law, etc., that just lead me to believe that he is nothing but a power hungry individual who already has enough power.

All that said, I'm really not concerned, because as I keep reiterating, I don't think he stands a chance at winning the election, or even getting the Republican nomination. If he does get the nomination, it will be interesting to see how those debates go, and if he's able to continue to say nothing and gain momentum, against an opponent who I don't think will be afraid to sling mud at him the way that Bush/Cruz/Rubio/Kasich all seem to be. I can barely stand Hilary Clinton, but I'm more comfortable with her in office than Trump, which is saying a lot. She's going to absolutely dominate the same group of voters who put Obama into office twice, as well as additional women voters. This seems to be fact at this point, despite what the Republican party tries to sell. The list of minorities and women in America who will cast their vote for Trump is slim. A lot slimmer than he'd need it to be to stand a shot at winning. The good news is all the people who thought the country would dump into the crapper when Obama was elected into office, and then elected into it again, as well as those who thought the same thing both times Bush was elected into office, will have four solid years of complaining ahead of them regardless of who wins, while our day to day lives change very minimally. The president is just not that major a piece of the puzzle in our political atmosphere.

The next year will be interesting, to say the least.
Image
Image
User avatar
bigh0rt
NLSC Team Member
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 8808
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: New York

Re: Trump 2016

Postby Andrew on Fri Mar 18, 2016 8:45 am

Phil89 wrote:The similarities between the current Trump phenomenon and what happened in 1930's Germany are quite disturbing. Times of hardship usually create the perfect conditions for the more extreme politicians to spread their message and become more popular.


There are some disturbing parallels and eerie similarities that have been pointed out.
NLSC Webmaster/Administrator
Image
Contact: Email | Twitter
Release Threads: NBA Live 08 | NBA Live 07 | NBA Live 06 | NBA Live 2005 | NBA Live 2004
Story Threads: NBA 2K13 | NBA Live 06 (Part 2) | NBA Live 06 (HOF) | NBA Live 2004 (HOF)
NLSC: Podcast | The Friday Five | Monday Tip-Off | Wayback Wednesday | 20th Anniversary of NBA Live | Facebook | Twitter | YouTube


Support The NLSC Hosting Fund: Patreon | GoFundMe

Image
Like my work? Want to help out with the NLSC Hosting Fund? Please consider leaving a tip!
User avatar
Andrew
Orange Juice, haha!
Administrator
 
Posts: 99560
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Trump 2016

Postby [Q] on Fri Mar 18, 2016 11:18 am

Andrew wrote:
Phil89 wrote:The similarities between the current Trump phenomenon and what happened in 1930's Germany are quite disturbing. Times of hardship usually create the perfect conditions for the more extreme politicians to spread their message and become more popular.


There are some disturbing parallels and eerie similarities that have been pointed out.

The sad part is that conditions here are not bad, people are just being whiny little bitches who like to complain about the little things.

I think what's helping Trump is that he has no competition
Image
User avatar
[Q]
NBA Live 18 Optimist
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 11472
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 8:20 am
Location: Westside, the best side

Re: Trump 2016

Postby Andrew on Fri Mar 18, 2016 11:50 am

I suppose we all get a bit myopic about these things. "I don't like that TV show, so therefore it's bad." "I don't want to play that video game, therefore it shouldn't be made." "I'm not doing particularly well right now, so therefore the country must be in terrible shape".
NLSC Webmaster/Administrator
Image
Contact: Email | Twitter
Release Threads: NBA Live 08 | NBA Live 07 | NBA Live 06 | NBA Live 2005 | NBA Live 2004
Story Threads: NBA 2K13 | NBA Live 06 (Part 2) | NBA Live 06 (HOF) | NBA Live 2004 (HOF)
NLSC: Podcast | The Friday Five | Monday Tip-Off | Wayback Wednesday | 20th Anniversary of NBA Live | Facebook | Twitter | YouTube


Support The NLSC Hosting Fund: Patreon | GoFundMe

Image
Like my work? Want to help out with the NLSC Hosting Fund? Please consider leaving a tip!
User avatar
Andrew
Orange Juice, haha!
Administrator
 
Posts: 99560
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Trump 2016

Postby benji on Fri Mar 18, 2016 1:39 pm

The only story on Trump 2016 you need: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/ne ... e-20160224

bigh0rt wrote:saying they can't wait until he's President so they can just kill them (the 1st Amendment is for suckers anyway, I guess), taking pride in the notion of torture, and the potential to commit war crimes that violate the Geneva Convention. It makes me thank God that I don't live in an area where that train of thought is considered normal or even acceptable. Sure, we've got them here, but they're few and far between, and generally looked down upon (whether that's right or wrong).

You don't live in the United States?

The last two Administrations have participated in torture, arguably have participated in war crimes, and have committed a tremendous number of crimes related to "wars" both formally declared and undeclared. The sitting Administration claims it has the authority to murder any American citizen anywhere in the world for any reason. And has murdered two innocent Americans, one for being the son of the other and thus "not having had a better father."

The hysteria around Trump's random statements versus the borderline silence regarding actual crimes that are committed regularly by the state every day is all the evidence one needs to prove Trump is a viable candidate and the presumptive Republican nominee.

Compare for example, the attention John Oliver got for his Trump segment linked above (85 million views) compared to the one he did on the everyday crime of Civil Forfeiture that featured Jeff Goldblum (7 million).

[Q] wrote:It's a really bad thing for this country to have such a big and well-known figure show people it's okay to attack and insult large groups of people that are simply different from you.

Like you've attacked and insulted Trump supporters? Or spread lies about Trump like you have?
[Q] wrote:denouncing the KKK? That's too far for Trump.

From August 2015:
Donald Trump says he isn’t interested in the endorsement of David Duke, the anti-Semitic former Ku Klux Klan leader who praised the GOP presidential hopeful earlier this week on his radio show.

“I don’t need his endorsement; I certainly wouldn’t want his endorsement,” Trump said during an interview with Bloomberg’s Mark Halperin and John Heilemann. He added: “I don’t need anyone’s endorsement.”

Asked whether he would repudiate the endorsement, Trump said “Sure, I would if that would make you feel better.”

“A lot of people like me,” he said. “Republicans like me, liberals like me. Everybody likes me.”


bigh0rt wrote:The way things are shaping up with the Republican primaries, it does not look like Trump will get enough delegates to get the automatic nomination

bigh0rt wrote:As I said previously, I don't see the Republican party nominating Trump, as he projects to fall short of the necessary number of delegates needed to get the automatic bid.

Yes, it does. As long as keeps winning, the margin doesn't matter because he wins out.

There are no number of delegates to get an "automatic bid" by either party.

Phil89 wrote:Hitler utilised the myth that the Jews were responsible for Germany losing WW1 to gain support from disenchanted army veterans and impoverished German civilians. Trump is doing the same thing by scapegoating Mexicans as rapists and criminals and calling all Muslims terrorists

Do people who believe this kind of non-comparative nuttery want to believe it? Or is it just ignorance of facts?

Axel wrote:I'm worried Kasich will get the nomination in a corrupted convention which will obviously seal the election for Hillary Clinton.

I can't imagine Kasich wins eight states, and/or after the release of delegates that anyone votes for Kasich.

[Q] wrote:I think what's helping Trump is that he has no competition

lol
User avatar
benji
 
Posts: 14341
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am

Re: Trump 2016

Postby benji on Fri Mar 18, 2016 2:36 pm

[Q] wrote:You have to understand that he is a Republican and there are a lot of Republicans stuck in the old ways that agree with what he is doing.

Trump does better with independents than he does with self-declared Republicans, much like Sanders. (Another thing both have in common, not being a longstanding member of the political party whose nomination they're seeking.)

Kevin wrote:You americans are anti-Trump when on the internet but a supporter of him in real life. Seriously, if a large portion of the USA hates him why does he almost always wins the polls?

Did you know that there can be separate individual components that make up an arbitrary whole?

Also, to date: 7.5 million people have voted for Donald Trump. 5.5 million for Ted Cruz.

6.2 million people voted for Barack Obama in the 2012 primaries, and he wasn't running against anyone you've ever heard of. 10 million voted for Mitt Romney, 8 million for Santorum/Paul/Gingrich combined.

There are 146 million people registered to vote. Out of 220 million eligible.
User avatar
benji
 
Posts: 14341
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am

Re: Trump 2016

Postby [Q] on Fri Mar 18, 2016 3:26 pm

Lol I've been waiting for ben to fact-check this whole thread
Image
User avatar
[Q]
NBA Live 18 Optimist
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 11472
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 8:20 am
Location: Westside, the best side

Re: Trump 2016

Postby benji on Fri Mar 18, 2016 4:14 pm

I had to pay back Jao for making the ESPN March Madness Group.

And the Ben Shapiro video made it essential.
User avatar
benji
 
Posts: 14341
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am

Re: Trump 2016

Postby benji on Fri Mar 18, 2016 4:17 pm

Real men watch MAOIST REBEL NEWS, not Ben Shapiro's garbage:
phpBB [video]

phpBB [video]

phpBB [video]
User avatar
benji
 
Posts: 14341
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am

Re: Trump 2016

Postby Cpt(K) on Fri Mar 18, 2016 6:31 pm

benji wrote:I had to pay back Jao for making the ESPN March Madness Group.

And the Ben Shapiro video made it essential.


Senpai noticed me! :oops:

Real men watch MAOIST REBEL NEWS, not Ben Shapiro's garbage:


benji, I identify as a gender-fluid, two-spirit, trans-racial, Muslim atheist, other-kin feminist, anti-racist, SJW. Your dichotomy for what constitutes as a "real man" is triggering, do not assert that you know what is, and what isn't a substantive trove of information for a "man" (such a binary word, tsk tsk) to absorb. I bet you're a CIS gender straight white male. Check your privilege!

Okay, I tried hard. :wink: . . . . I stole it from here:

phpBB [video]


Sometimes I can't tell if you legitimately mean what you say, or are just jabbing. Maybe I need to pay attention to the forum activity more. :?

Shapiro wasn't the reason that video was posted (although, I do appreciate his perspectives, along with a number of other individuals who bear "conservative" on their shoulders), my previous post was supposed to nuance the idea of productive discourse, that Orwell's six rules for writing could help in achieving. There you see two individuals exchanging (in this case, one interviewing, inquiring of the other) ideas, and thoughts. Instead of ripping each others entrails out, which is something that disturbingly seems to be more prevalent today. :lol:

I think I'll be laughed at if I suggest that Trump is actually two-timing the Republican nomination, I mean, I think he may very well be posturing to be nominated only to give it to Clinton, which would cement any under-the-table deals he may have made. I guess I'll prepare the tin foil . . . :lol:
User avatar
Cpt(K)
 
Posts: 620
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 2:49 am
Location: Purple area of Illinois

Re: Trump 2016

Postby benji on Fri Mar 18, 2016 6:54 pm

Cpt(K) wrote:There you see two individuals exchanging (in this case, one interviewing, inquiring of the other) ideas, and thoughts. Instead of ripping each others entrails out, which is something that disturbingly seems to be more prevalent today. :lol:

The irony is that Shapiro argues for the latter course of pure insult as the best form of philosophical debate.

Ben Shapiro wrote:1. Walk Toward the Fire

“The left knows this is war. And they know you are the enemy. You will be castigated. You will get punched. That’s the way it will go because that’s how the left wins: through intimidation and cruelty. You have to take the punch, you have to brush it off. You have to be willing to take the punch.”

2. Hit First

“Don’t take the punch first. Hit first. Hit hard. Hit where it counts. Mike Tyson used to say, “Everybody has a plan ‘til they get punched in the mouth.” That’s exactly correct. But throwing the first punch requires game-planning. Walking through the door, you have one shot – one! – to put someone down for the count from the beginning of a debate. If done properly, any debate on a single topic can be over within the first 30 seconds.”

3. Frame Your Opponent

“I have argued that the left’s entire playbook consists of a single play: characterizing the opposition. It’s incredibly effective. And the only way to get beyond character arguments is to frame your opponent – make it toxic for your opponent to slur you. Then, hopefully, you can move the debate to more substantive territory. This is the vital first step. It is the only first step…There is no way to convince someone that you don’t hate him or her. You can convince him or her, however, that your opposition is a liar and a hater.”

4. Frame the Debate

“It’s important that you neuter those buzzwords quickly, because otherwise you will be arguing against nonsense terms that can be used against you. You can’t argue against empty terms. So don’t accept the premises of their arguments, which are largely buzzword based…It’s important that you neuter those buzzwords quickly, because otherwise you will be arguing against nonsense terms that can be used against you. You can’t argue against empty terms. So don’t accept the premises of their arguments, which are largely buzzword based…As a general matter, the left’s favorite three lines of attack are (1) you’re stupid; (2) you’re mean; (3) you’re corrupt. Sarah Palin is supposedly stupid; Mitt Romney is supposedly mean; Dick Cheney is supposedly corrupt. Take away those lines of attack and watch the discomfort set in.”

http://www.truthrevolt.org/system/files ... y_them.pdf

phpBB [video]


~7:30+ is a perfect example
User avatar
benji
 
Posts: 14341
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am

Re: Trump 2016

Postby bigh0rt on Fri Mar 18, 2016 9:13 pm

benji wrote:
bigh0rt wrote:The way things are shaping up with the Republican primaries, it does not look like Trump will get enough delegates to get the automatic nomination

bigh0rt wrote:As I said previously, I don't see the Republican party nominating Trump, as he projects to fall short of the necessary number of delegates needed to get the automatic bid.

Yes, it does. As long as keeps winning, the margin doesn't matter because he wins out.

There are no number of delegates to get an "automatic bid" by either party.

I was referring to a contested convention. Figured easier to refer to automatic/non-automatic for all the non-Americans participating in the thread (seemed to outnumber the Americans, at least in the early going; also I couldn't remember the name for it off the top of my head and couldn't be bothered to look it up until just now). I do not think he will get to the 1,237 necessary delegates (again, this is just based off of projections for delegates that I have read, which is fluid, especially as candidates drop out of the race). Though he's certainly in a commanding lead regardless. It will be interesting, though, to see if the party chooses to, for lack of a better word, screw him, and choose somebody else, should he not get to 1,237.
Image
Image
User avatar
bigh0rt
NLSC Team Member
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 8808
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: New York

Re: Trump 2016

Postby benji on Fri Mar 18, 2016 10:48 pm

Most delegates are bound, candidates dropping out doesn't change anything until they're released at the convention.

Currently Trump is on target for ~1290 delegates. For Trump to fall short Cruz has to overtake him. Cruz can't win, but that's how Trump would be denied his majority. And even if he falls short but is clearly close, the party would be insane to deny him going over via unbound/unpledged.

And all that requires Kasich to drop out. Which he's said he won't do because he thinks he's on track for a victory.

And the party to decide to back Cruz, who they hate personally. And does even worse in a general.

Denying both Trump and Cruz at the convention is even more insane, the mass of GOP voters will simply stay home. Which will blow up downticket far more than Trump as the candidate.
User avatar
benji
 
Posts: 14341
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am

Re: Trump 2016

Postby Cpt(K) on Sat Mar 19, 2016 4:12 am

benji wrote:The irony is that Shapiro argues for the latter course of pure insult as the best form of philosophical debate.


Yeah, there's some cognitive dissonance present, which is besides the point. I mean, there's no suggesting Shapiro, or anyone can perfectly practice a civil discussion. Effort matters a little more than the record in this regard. Fortunately as per the video, those rules Shapiro outlined, are not always used -- even when (as the interview shows) encountering someone opposite of the political aisle. I would contend the premise of those rules from Shapiro is essentially a "they say, I say," where the perpetrator of the ad hominem is returned the measure of their language, with a little substance for balance (mustn't go all barbarous with the language, what's the use of discussion then).

More irony is that, if I remember correctly, Shapiro, or someone else in the conservative tent, concede that "pure insult" is a stratagem exclusively honed and utilized by the left. Meaning, not to use it, because of the margin of experience. I wouldn't agree Shapiro calls for the hurling, of "pure insult" although to a degree insults are used. I think, a play on "don't argue with a fool, less he drags you down and beats you with experience." Definitely, a less than flattering, or neutral tone to take when trying to determine how to conduct a discussion. However, at the very least Shapiro maintains, the ultimate goal is to (win, and) convey the substance to be had with discussion. Rather than exemplify the definition of sanctimonious to each other. "Oh, you say that? Well, only a [insert here] believes that!" A practice that overwhelms every side, albeit with varying degrees of barbarous behavior. Incidentally, Orwell's sixth rule of writing.
User avatar
Cpt(K)
 
Posts: 620
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 2:49 am
Location: Purple area of Illinois

Re: Trump 2016

Postby benji on Thu Apr 07, 2016 2:10 am

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chalkening

http://emorywheel.com/emory-students-ex ... chalkings/
Image
“I’m supposed to feel comfortable and safe [here],” one student said. “But this man [Trump] is being supported by students on our campus and our administration shows that they, by their silence, support it as well . . . I don’t deserve to feel afraid at my school,” she added.

“What do we have to do for you to listen to us?” students asked Wagner directly, to which he asked, “What actions should I take?” One student asked if Emory would send out a University-wide email to “decry the support for this fascist, racist candidate” to which Wagner replied, “No, we will not.” One student clarified that “the University doesn’t have to say they don’t support Trump, but just to acknowledge that there are students on this campus who feel this way about what’s happening . . . to acknowledge all of us here.”
User avatar
benji
 
Posts: 14341
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am

Re: Trump 2016

Postby benji on Thu Apr 07, 2016 2:12 am

Donald J. Trump ✔ ‎@realDonaldTrump
Wisconsin has suffered a great loss of jobs and trade, but if I win, all of the bad things happening in the U.S. will be rapidly reversed!
7:15 AM - 2 Apr 2016



Donald Trump has been taking heat for saying that he plans to pay off the entire $19 trillion national debt in eight years while at the same time promising a massive tax cut that would cost $12 trillion and calling for budget-busting spending programs.

Trump told radio host Joe Pags over the weekend that he will do this by putting the squeeze on Japan and appointing “great people” to cut the budget of each federal department “2 or 3 percent.” Such a plan, Trump said, would be “very easy” to pull off.

“It’s possible that if Japan doesn’t want to pay up, we’ll say, ‘Good luck and defend yourself,’” he said. “If that means they’re going to have to arm in some way, they’re going to have to arm in some way. We can’t afford to — we’re paying for the military of Japan. And every time this maniac in North Korea — and it’s a bigger problem for them than it is for us, frankly — every time this maniac in North Korea raises his head, we start doubling up. At one point do people take care of us? We’re a debtor nation. Our country is falling apart. Our infrastructure is dying. We owe all of those trillions of dollars. $19, it’s going to be $21 very soon with that stupid budget that was just passed three months ago, the omnibus budget, at what point do we say, ‘Enough, enough’?”

He predicted that the Japanese government would eventually acquiesce to President Trump’s demand to “pay much more money” for military protection and that Saudi Arabia would also pay up: “They don’t like us so much and you know what, with me, they’re going to like us and they’re going to pay more and they’re going to be very happy, okay?

Warning that companies are outsourcing all of America’s jobs, Trump said that “we’re not going to have anything left and I know how to stop it in two seconds.”

“I know how to fix it, so easy, that aspect of it,” Trump continued. “And even, you know, the nuclear. I am doing so good on nuclear by people that are fair. What’s happening now is we’re paying for the world’s — we’re like the world’s policeman but they don’t pay us for it. We lose a fortune on the military. You know, our military budget is phenomenally higher than any other budget but it’s not for us, we’re protecting everybody else and we lose a fortune. Frankly, Joe, we lose a fortune on everything we do and we have to make our country strong financially again and if we don’t do that we’re never going to have a strong country again. And I’ll save Social Security. I’ll save things that everyone else says can’t be saved because I’ll bring back all of this money that we’re wasting on other countries.

We’re going to have a country like you wouldn’t believe,” he said.

The Joel Anthony of Presidential Candidates
User avatar
benji
 
Posts: 14341
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am

Re: Trump 2016

Postby NovU on Thu Apr 07, 2016 6:55 am

Trump's been unfairly vilified by media and through social network partly because he supports his own campaign unlike rest of candidates who are funded heavily by corps.

Reasons for his popularity is quite simple. Unlike rest of candidates, what he says makes a lot of sense to americans (though this is not the case if you hear about him only through medias and social network). He dares to talk about things that are never talked about between politicians such as bringing manufacturing industry back. How great would it sound to you americans if apple factories actually resided in the states. Also a lot of americans are tired of illegals coming over to America and causing all sorts of trouble at all levels in society. Wouldn't it sound nice to you if someone said he'd actually enforce the law so illegals can't come to your neighborhood as easily as now? Donald also talks about befriending China and Russia which is unprecedented as recent history depict them as hardcore enemies to a point where people are worried about ww3. Political correctness is what has infuriated americans and Donald condemns it. He's a fresh air to them.

Could he be lying? Ofc. But we know all other candidates are, especially given their track record. But the difference is Donald has never been a lying politician and people are tired of politicians and their lies.

At the end of the day he's gaining popularity because he's looking like lesser evil to rest of bought out politicians.
THX TO DOPE-JAO FOR THE SPECIAL SIG! <3
Image
Enjoy! <3 Jao
User avatar
NovU
Crap, what am I going to brag about now?
 
Posts: 10612
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 6:50 pm

Re: Trump 2016

Postby Axel on Thu Apr 07, 2016 8:12 am

NovU wrote:Trump's been unfairly vilified by media and through social network partly because he supports his own campaign unlike rest of candidates who are funded heavily by corps.


Anytime one person can draw the ire of all corporate media he's doing something right.

At the end of the day he's gaining popularity because he's looking like lesser evil to rest of bought out politicians.


He has certainly been emphasizing his self funded campaign more and more as of late. I think it's definitely his calling card right now, and he has a great understanding of the discontent in America. Unfortunately there are many people still brainwashed by the propaganda they see on TV, and this election cycle has really brought it out.
User avatar
Axel
 
Posts: 2843
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 9:46 am
Location: North Carolina

Re: Trump 2016

Postby benji on Mon Apr 11, 2016 3:03 pm

NovU wrote:He dares to talk about things that are never talked about between politicians such as bringing manufacturing industry back. How great would it sound to you americans if apple factories actually resided in the states.

I think Americans prefer $600 iPhones to $60,000 iPhones.

Also a lot of americans are tired of illegals coming over to America

Lots of people are xenophobic and fear those who look and sound different from them, see: modern Europe, history of humanity, etc.

But the difference is Donald has never been a lying politician

Except for the last year.

Wouldn't it sound nice to you if someone said he'd actually enforce the law so illegals can't come to your neighborhood as easily as now?

No, because this belies a lack of knowledge about immigration law and also natural rights.
User avatar
benji
 
Posts: 14341
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am

Re: Trump 2016

Postby Ur Boi Bangs Chol on Mon Apr 11, 2016 9:16 pm

benji wrote:The Joel Anthony of Presidential Candidates

I am now a believer.

Make America great again, Americans.
ImageImageImage
HE'S USING HYPNOSIS!
JaoSming2KTV wrote:its fun on a bun
User avatar
Ur Boi Bangs Chol
NLSC's Jefferson Davis/The Questioneer
 
Posts: 22449
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 6:21 am
Location: In your mind

Re: Trump 2016

Postby NovU on Tue Apr 12, 2016 7:33 am

Interesting article. What Trump has wrought.
http://buchanan.org/blog/what-trump-has-wrought-125088
THX TO DOPE-JAO FOR THE SPECIAL SIG! <3
Image
Enjoy! <3 Jao
User avatar
NovU
Crap, what am I going to brag about now?
 
Posts: 10612
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 6:50 pm

Re: Trump 2016

Postby benji on Tue Apr 12, 2016 6:13 pm

phpBB [video]
User avatar
benji
 
Posts: 14341
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am

Re: Trump 2016

Postby NovU on Tue Apr 12, 2016 6:51 pm

LOL wtf happened in Colorado. Gotta luv american democrapcy.

Meanwhile in DC, 400+ arrested from huge group of protesters crying for fair election while no big media gave shit.

Man, is this a circus? Entire world is watching and I bet outsiders know more about shit going on in states more than avg americans. :lol:
THX TO DOPE-JAO FOR THE SPECIAL SIG! <3
Image
Enjoy! <3 Jao
User avatar
NovU
Crap, what am I going to brag about now?
 
Posts: 10612
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 6:50 pm

Re: Trump 2016

Postby benji on Tue Apr 12, 2016 9:56 pm

NovU wrote:LOL wtf happened in Colorado. Gotta luv american democrapcy.

...

Man, is this a circus? Entire world is watching and I bet outsiders know more about shit going on in states more than avg americans. :lol:

See this is the part where you look like an arrogant foreigner because you don't understand that the primaries are the internal decision making process of a corporation and aren't nor are meant to be anything resembling a democratic election.

It has far more in common with your closed door party leadership elections than it does with either your or our general elections.

It's just vastly more public.

And democratic.

And paid for by the taxpayers.

And allows those outside the party to register a meaningless polling selection.
User avatar
benji
 
Posts: 14341
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am

Re: Trump 2016

Postby JaoSming on Wed Apr 13, 2016 12:44 am

But will it change in 4 years?

phpBB [video]
Right Click Loop
phpBB [video]

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8ozxhwwmz4LJzpGAj22T5qa0ZVFBJ3yw

User avatar
JaoSming
2KTV Producer
NBA 2K Developer
 
Posts: 29779
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 12:45 am
Location: 2K

Re: Trump 2016

Postby NovU on Wed Apr 13, 2016 6:51 am

benji wrote:because avg americans don't understand that the primaries are the internal decision making process of a corporation and aren't nor are meant to be anything resembling a democratic election.

Fixed.



This will probably kill off GOP in Colorado tho. I actually feel some sympathy for naive outsider Donny. Canadien Cruz is too awesome at this game!
THX TO DOPE-JAO FOR THE SPECIAL SIG! <3
Image
Enjoy! <3 Jao
User avatar
NovU
Crap, what am I going to brag about now?
 
Posts: 10612
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 6:50 pm

Re: Trump 2016

Postby Axel on Fri Apr 15, 2016 10:18 am

Latest CBS & Fox New polls have Trump with an 18 and 13 point lead nationally.

Obviously the rules were transparent in Colorado, so Trump should have known. That said, some Trump delegates have claimed they were't able to vote.

phpBB [video]
User avatar
Axel
 
Posts: 2843
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 9:46 am
Location: North Carolina

Re: Trump 2016

Postby bowdown on Sun Apr 17, 2016 1:36 pm

Trump is selling his presidential bid like he sells everything else. "Its the best in the whole world. Trust me, you'll love it."
Image
User avatar
bowdown
Happy
 
Posts: 1920
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 6:30 am

Re: Trump 2016

Postby NovU on Mon Apr 18, 2016 9:55 pm

You guys realize what is really fun about this entire shenanigans? Whether or not on purpose, TrumpSanders are exposing a lot of people and pushing their button. First and foremost, now Americans know their voting system is rigged and their votes dont really count for jack except to serve as illusion of choice and freedom. Secondly, two parties dems and Republicans serve same interest so it doesn't matter which party wins. Neither GOP nor Democrats cares ltitle about winning. party system is a disguise and SandersTrump prolly by accident have exposed only 2 party exists are neocon and neoliberals.
THX TO DOPE-JAO FOR THE SPECIAL SIG! <3
Image
Enjoy! <3 Jao
User avatar
NovU
Crap, what am I going to brag about now?
 
Posts: 10612
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 6:50 pm

Re: Trump 2016

Postby benji on Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:59 pm

The internal decision making process of two corporations is not an election. It's no different in other countries.
User avatar
benji
 
Posts: 14341
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am

Re: Trump 2016

Postby Axel on Wed Apr 20, 2016 1:35 am

benji wrote:The internal decision making process of two corporations is not an election. It's no different in other countries.


So do you think Cruz will take most/all the 57 unpledged delegates in PA even if Trump wins by 15-20%?
User avatar
Axel
 
Posts: 2843
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 9:46 am
Location: North Carolina

Re: Trump 2016

Postby benji on Wed Apr 20, 2016 3:17 am

Trump is like Hillary08, no idea how delegates are allocated or what any of the rules are, intends to coast by the lesser challengers.

Cruz is more like Obama08/Paul12, lots of true believers willing to go to all the shitty process meetings and so on to pull away those small clumps of delegates that add up. Only his money and resources are closer to Obama than Ron.
User avatar
benji
 
Posts: 14341
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am

Re: Trump 2016

Postby bigh0rt on Wed Apr 20, 2016 4:21 am

I was fortunate enough to attend both the Bernie Sanders rally at Marist College, and the Donald Trump rally at the Mid-Hudson Civic Center, both in Poughkeepsie, NY, last week. Very interesting scenes, indeed, both of them. Very different, but in a lot of ways similar as well. The candidates just say the same stuff they say on TV, so the real show is in the people watching of others who attend and are head over heels into this thing. Some real lunatics in this town. People I probably walk by in the grocery store and don't think twice about. On both sides. :shock:
Image
Image
User avatar
bigh0rt
NLSC Team Member
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 8808
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: New York

Re: Trump 2016

Postby benji on Wed Apr 27, 2016 12:01 am

During a telephone interview with "Fox & Friends," Trump was asked about a tweet from Lena Dunham on Monday in which she vowed to leave the U.S. for Vancouver if he is elected president.

Trump's response: "Well, she's a B-actor. You know, she has no — you know, no mojo."

"I heard Whoopi Goldberg too. That would be a great thing for our country," Trump said, as the show flashed a graphic of celebrities who it said would leave the U.S. for Canada, including Dunham, Jon Stewart, and Rosie O'Donnell, with whom the Manhattan real-estate mogul has feuded for years.

When co-host Steve Doocy pointed out that O'Donnell's name on the list, Trump remarked, "Now I have to get elected."

"Now I have to get elected because I'll be doing a great service to our country," he said. "Now it's much more important. In fact, I'll immediately get off this call and start campaigning right now."
User avatar
benji
 
Posts: 14341
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am

Next

Return to Off-Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests