benji wrote:I had to pay back Jao for making the ESPN March Madness Group.
And the Ben Shapiro video made it essential.
Senpai noticed me!
Real men watch MAOIST REBEL NEWS, not Ben Shapiro's garbage:
benji, I identify as a gender-fluid, two-spirit, trans-racial, Muslim atheist, other-kin feminist, anti-racist, SJW. Your dichotomy for what constitutes as a "real man" is triggering, do not assert that you know what is, and what isn't a substantive trove of information for a "man" (such a binary word, tsk tsk) to absorb. I bet you're a CIS gender straight white male. Check your privilege!
Okay, I tried hard. . . . . I stole it from here:
Sometimes I can't tell if you legitimately mean what you say, or are just jabbing. Maybe I need to pay attention to the forum activity more.
Shapiro wasn't the reason that video was posted (although, I do appreciate his perspectives, along with a number of other individuals who bear "conservative" on their shoulders), my previous post was supposed to nuance the idea of productive discourse, that Orwell's six rules for writing could help in achieving. There you see two individuals exchanging (in this case, one interviewing, inquiring of the other) ideas, and thoughts. Instead of ripping each others entrails out, which is something that disturbingly seems to be more prevalent today.
I think I'll be laughed at if I suggest that Trump is actually two-timing the Republican nomination, I mean, I think he may very well be posturing to be nominated only to give it to Clinton, which would cement any under-the-table deals he may have made. I guess I'll prepare the tin foil . . .