Thu Feb 23, 2006 5:40 am
cyanide wrote:Perhaps 5 leading open-minded religious professors should all be in for creating a standard high school textbook on the world's major religions. There might be some bickering, but it's doable. I've seen an "office" at the University that has some theologians of different religions share the same program. Kinda neat how they all can co-exist in harmony.
Thu Feb 23, 2006 7:13 am
Thu Feb 23, 2006 7:16 am
Thu Feb 23, 2006 7:57 am
Jona wrote:How could a Buddhistm, a Muslim, a Jew and a Christian agree on how to interpret Buddha's or JC's teachings?
Thu Feb 23, 2006 7:59 am
Thu Feb 23, 2006 8:01 am
Thu Feb 23, 2006 8:07 am
cyanide wrote:No, but he thinks you're overweight.
Thu Feb 23, 2006 8:39 am
Jesus wouldnt say such a thing to me.
Thu Feb 23, 2006 9:22 am
Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:27 pm
Why accept the teachings but reject the Teacher? Why affirm God's existence with your life but deny it with your lips? I can't say who God will accept and who He won't, all I know is that it will be fair and just. But I do know that belief in God isn't some unnecessary luxury. How can one sustain a loving lifestyle without God, who is Love? How can one stay true to a course of goodness without the strength, support & motivation of the only one who is truly Good, ultimately Good?D-Weaver99027 wrote:Bullsfan, consider this:
Would God deny entrance to the Heavens to a man who has lived by 'Christian' virtue, despite not believing in the concept of God. In the end, and to everyone else's eyes but our own, it is what we DO, not what we BELIEVE.
Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:36 pm
Why accept the teachings but reject the Teacher?
Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:58 am
D-Weaver99027 wrote:Why accept the teachings but reject the Teacher?
Don't you see? They don't HAVE TO BE teachings. They can simply be each man's TRUTH.
Fri Feb 24, 2006 9:08 am
This takes us back to our continual debate, Dweaver\"Always What, Never wrote:Why accept the teachings but reject the Teacher?
Don't you see? They don't HAVE TO BE teachings. They can simply be each man's TRUTH.
Fri Feb 24, 2006 10:11 am
Fri Feb 24, 2006 1:45 pm
cyanide wrote:Gotta agree with what Jona said above. In addition, the Bible shouldn't be viewed as something to believe in or take literally, but to understand the widsom and metaphorical messages it provides, which would really enrich anybody's life. The same goes for any other religion out there. Religion isn't something that I want to be label myself into, but rather to appreciate the universal truths that it acknowledges. There's a lot of good messages that can be found in Christianity, but there's also a lot of great spiritual resonance that can be found in Buddhism as well. There's no religion I want to be part of, but I want to learn through the wisdom and spiritual guidance of actual living people who sees the world and people through a higher level of meaning in life.
Sat Feb 25, 2006 12:46 am
Are you saying that Catholosism and other sects are not true?
And what would you say to someone that thinks that conservative Christians are liars?
Isn't that condradicting what Jesus preached, "Love thy brother"?
Sat Feb 25, 2006 2:13 am
bullsfan009 wrote:This takes us back to our continual debate, Dweaver\"Always What, Never wrote:Why accept the teachings but reject the Teacher?
Don't you see? They don't HAVE TO BE teachings. They can simply be each man's TRUTH.![]()
Some people's "Truths" are simply wrong. Like Adolph Hitler, or KKK members, etc.
Cyanide wrote:But it's their truth that defines them, regardless of how we see them.
Sat Feb 25, 2006 2:18 am
Sat Feb 25, 2006 5:38 am
bullsfan009 wrote:I'm not sure what you mean by that, Cy, but let me ask you a direct question if I may:
Was Hitler WRONG by killing 6 million Jews, and 11 million people overall?
Sat Feb 25, 2006 7:12 am
Sat Feb 25, 2006 8:06 am
Sat Feb 25, 2006 8:39 am
bullsfan009 wrote:But on what grounds can someone say this to a Hitler? Why is my idea of Truth better/more right than his?
This is where God ties in. With God's commandments as the standard, you could say to Hitler, "You're wrong because your ways are going against everything God is, and stands for, and told us to stand for. Therefore you must be stopped, and you WILL BE, in this life or the next"
I've been wondering in my thinking if maybe "Love" can be substituted in there for God ("God is love" anyway), but I'm really not sure if that's sufficient. It's on the right track though I think...
Wed Mar 01, 2006 11:05 pm
Yes I agree, Cy, great pointscyanide wrote:Your idea of Truth is better/more right than his, imo, stems from love. As I've said before, the greatest thing in the world for me is love. Though love can cause extreme pain, on the opposite spectrum, it's bliss. After reading Jesus' messages, I honestly believe that the most important thing to him and his greatest message for us is merely 'to love.' I don't think we, as human beings, can survive or function without love. We're biologically predisposed to this intangible phenomenon, and when we embrace it, it almost feels as we unexplainably recognize it as something greater than us. I guess that's what you might describe as God.
me too, that's how I feel. It's really unfortunate when people let that happen, making God second to the Church organization or old religious traditions. There are times that one may have to speak out against those in order to stand up for God...that's certaintly what Jesus did.mark_30_112 wrote:I've always been told not to let religon come between you and God. But I'm Christian in that sense.
Wed Mar 01, 2006 11:46 pm
Was Hitler WRONG by killing 6 million Jews, and 11 million people overall?
Thu Mar 02, 2006 2:14 am