Official Boston Celtics Thread

Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.

Postby NovU on Wed Aug 08, 2007 8:55 am

whether boston fall shorts from expectation or not, still the best move by ainge. we now get to witness prolly the best big 3(individually at prime) in history of nba... ppl gotta appreciate that, making boston everybody's favorite team now...
THX TO DOPE-JAO FOR THE SPECIAL SIG! <3
Image
Enjoy! <3 Jao
User avatar
NovU
Crap, what am I going to brag about now?
 
Posts: 11325
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 6:50 pm

Postby Sauru on Wed Aug 08, 2007 10:11 am

my opinion is they are the best 3 some in the nba now, i wont say of all time though. i still say the original big 3 are better and among the best of all time, top 3.
User avatar
Sauru
 
Posts: 7726
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 11:01 am

Postby Silas on Thu Aug 09, 2007 1:32 pm

You of course are referring to the original big three of the latter half of the 06-07 season correct?

Andre Igaudala, Kyle Korver, and Shavlik Randolph.
User avatar
Silas
 
Posts: 2259
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 6:14 am
Location: Seattle Area

Postby cyanide on Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:28 pm

I think he's referring to an old Celtic team. Am I right, Sauru?
if you were killed tomorrow, i WOULDNT GO 2 UR FUNERAL CUZ ID B N JAIL 4 KILLIN THE MOTHA FUCKER THAT KILLED U!
......|..___________________, ,
....../ `---______----|]
...../==o;;;;;;;;______.:/
.....), ---.(_(__) /
....// (..) ), ----"
...//___//
..//___//
.//___//
WE TRUE HOMIES
WE RIDE TOGETHER
WE DIE TOGETHER
User avatar
cyanide
Dat steatopygous
 
Posts: 9197
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 6:09 am
Location: US's toque

Postby Sauru on Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:00 am

bird,mchale,and the chief. of course the celtic teams of old could also have thier own versions of the "big 3" though i think the fact that the 3 i just mentioned played the forward and center spots makes them the "big 3" while most teams best 3 players included a guard.
User avatar
Sauru
 
Posts: 7726
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 11:01 am

Postby [Q] on Sat Aug 11, 2007 3:58 am

Qballer wrote:I wonder what number KG will wear. with nearly all numbers 1-40 taken, They'll probably have a starting lineup with number 50 and up sooner or later. I think 21 is taken by Bill Sharman... lol @ Telfair trying to unretire #31.


House will wear No. 50 and Pollard No. 66. The reason?

“Because all the other (expletive) numbers were taken here,” Pollard said, looking around a conference room that had the numbers of Bill Russell (6), Tom Heinsohn (15), John Havlicek (17), Robert Parish (00), Larry Bird (33) and Kevin McHale (32) hanging on the wall. . . .


great minds think alike. :o
Image
User avatar
[Q]
NBA Live 18 Advocate
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 14396
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 8:20 am
Location: Westside, the best side

Postby Sauru on Sat Aug 11, 2007 4:17 am

lol the celtics gonna be the first team with players wearing 3 digit jerseys
User avatar
Sauru
 
Posts: 7726
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 11:01 am

Postby Andrew on Sat Aug 25, 2007 4:17 pm

Celtics Interested In Patterson

I think it would be a decent signing. He averaged around 15, 5 and 3 for the Bucks last year, I'd rate him as being fairly solid at both ends of the court and he'd add a bit of much needed depth in the wake of the Garnett trade. Posey is also mentioned as a possibility which I think would be good move as well. Perhaps even Allan Houston will draw some interest now that Reggie Miller has indicated he'll stay in retirement.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115269
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Silas on Sat Aug 25, 2007 4:43 pm

I agree, and though he's had attitude problems, I think his age and the fact he's with three quality good people like KG, Ray, and Pierce, will mean that he will contribute rather than distract the team.

Houston would also be a great pickup, I think they'll realistically be able to pick and choose from whomever they want as long as the salary is low.
User avatar
Silas
 
Posts: 2259
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 6:14 am
Location: Seattle Area

Postby grusom on Sat Aug 25, 2007 8:10 pm

Patterson would be a good backup since he can guard and play three positions. It looks like the Celtics will have a hard time picking up another decent center (I can't think of anyone still on the market), but they should still be able to find a prober pass first guard. I like the Eddie House signing, but he's more of a sg in pg body IMO. Dan Dickau anyone?
User avatar
grusom
 
Posts: 420
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 11:22 pm
Location: Denmark

Postby Sauru on Sun Aug 26, 2007 4:10 am

by no means am i trying to call the center spot solid for the celtics, but we do have a back up center now with pollard.

i think the intention is to play house at the point, which i am fine with, as pierce will be the ball handler anyway.

i think a player liker patterson would be a great pick up off the bench, more so than reggie would have. sure reggie would have given us a better shooter but patterson is superior on the defensive end and thats what we need from the bench. if by some crazy turn of events pierce,allen,and kg all are on the bench at once the shots will go to house which he has proven is not a bad thing
User avatar
Sauru
 
Posts: 7726
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 11:01 am

Postby cyanide on Sun Aug 26, 2007 6:27 am

Posey's playing for Boston now. Good move?
if you were killed tomorrow, i WOULDNT GO 2 UR FUNERAL CUZ ID B N JAIL 4 KILLIN THE MOTHA FUCKER THAT KILLED U!
......|..___________________, ,
....../ `---______----|]
...../==o;;;;;;;;______.:/
.....), ---.(_(__) /
....// (..) ), ----"
...//___//
..//___//
.//___//
WE TRUE HOMIES
WE RIDE TOGETHER
WE DIE TOGETHER
User avatar
cyanide
Dat steatopygous
 
Posts: 9197
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 6:09 am
Location: US's toque

Postby TheMC5 on Sun Aug 26, 2007 6:39 am

Yeah, I just read that at Real GM. Looks like a solid move for the C's, and it probably puts them as the odds on favorites to win the East. They still need 1 more PG and possibly 1 more big, but even if they don't fill those holes, they're still a very talented and well balanced team.
TheMC5
 
Posts: 875
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:53 pm

Postby Sauru on Sun Aug 26, 2007 7:47 am

great pick up by the celtics, the thing i like most about it is he signed for 2 seasons where most of the pick ups are for 1 year. i think this should put the celtics are the team to beat in the east, or if you wont go that far i think they have to be put on level as the bulls and pistons(finals or not i am not putting the cavs top 3). i agree the celts still need another big or pg, though the market for bigs is pretty slim now and the pg is not as bad as it seems imo. anyway, there have been championship teams without a great big or pg, though its definetly tougher.
User avatar
Sauru
 
Posts: 7726
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 11:01 am

Postby McDwyane on Sun Aug 26, 2007 10:32 am

James Posey is a nice addition to the celts.He can defend and shoot 3's.
User avatar
McDwyane
 
Posts: 1603
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 4:41 pm
Location: McDwyane's

Postby -Young Buck- on Sun Aug 26, 2007 10:54 am

Posey is a very nice pickup, but will he get that much time behind Allen and Pierce? I think they could have used a better PF/C to add to their team. Maybe they will be able to resign Kandiman, he is decent.
Image
User avatar
-Young Buck-
 
Posts: 1384
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 6:00 am

Postby Silas on Sun Aug 26, 2007 11:02 am

Yes, if he has a tiny salary, he's not so overrated anymore. He's certainly almost as productive as Scott Pollard is.
User avatar
Silas
 
Posts: 2259
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 6:14 am
Location: Seattle Area

Postby Dan's Brain on Sun Aug 26, 2007 11:07 am

I didnt really want to dislike the Celtics this year, but James Posey has made that difficult.


However, I think he's a very good pickup for the Celtics. Depth was always going to be an issue after their cleanouts this off-season, but Posey's signing will certainly go a long way towards alleviating that.
User avatar
Dan's Brain
My Manwich!
 
Posts: 2150
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2002 9:08 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia.

Postby grusom on Sun Aug 26, 2007 11:22 am

I would have liked Patterson more, since he can play more positions effectively. Posey, however, is a better shooter than Patterson, and the C's won't have to worry about any potential rape/whatever cases with him (hopefully).

The Celtics are indeed starting to look like a championship team.

Nice pickup, but I would still like to see them sign another solid pg or center.

(btw, this post may have been more appropriate in the "I'm drunk"-thread in GT, but fuck that, I'm drunk)
User avatar
grusom
 
Posts: 420
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 11:22 pm
Location: Denmark

Postby McDwyane on Sun Aug 26, 2007 1:32 pm

IMO,Danny Ainge should be executive of the year.He brought many talent to the Celtics.
User avatar
McDwyane
 
Posts: 1603
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 4:41 pm
Location: McDwyane's

Postby maceo24 on Sun Aug 26, 2007 1:43 pm

Only if it works out, if this bombs theyre screwed. They've gone from one of the youngest teams to one of the oldest in about a month. Amazing talent level, but they have to win NOW.
Image
Un-Official Forum V.O.R. (Voice of Reason)/Also Known as Lupe O'Bryant
User avatar
maceo24
 
Posts: 493
Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 11:17 am
Location: Jamesburg, NJ

Postby McDwyane on Sun Aug 26, 2007 2:11 pm

Well,you have a point.KG and Ray are 10+ yrs pro right?Still if they retire in somewhere 17 yr pro mark,the celts' move will not be considered as junk.At first,I was disappointed in the draftday trade but once i heard KG's arrival,It seemed good.Let's wait for a year and let's see what will happen.
User avatar
McDwyane
 
Posts: 1603
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 4:41 pm
Location: McDwyane's

Postby maceo24 on Sun Aug 26, 2007 2:28 pm

17 years is very optimistic for any pro career nowadays, they dont make em the way they used to, lol. 14-15 years top IMO. I think the bigger question is how much longer theyre under contract. If it doesnt work out immediately, will the celtics be able to afford this trio when it come to resigning time? If they dont win in the next two years you have to look at the possibility of any one/two/all three of these guys flocking to the contender with the biggest wallet. Not that theyll be dicks about it, theyre all good guys, but they arent going to resign for peanuts just to keep the team together.
Image
Un-Official Forum V.O.R. (Voice of Reason)/Also Known as Lupe O'Bryant
User avatar
maceo24
 
Posts: 493
Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 11:17 am
Location: Jamesburg, NJ

Postby McDwyane on Sun Aug 26, 2007 2:35 pm

Well,if they don't win you're right.Many crucial decisions will come to them.
User avatar
McDwyane
 
Posts: 1603
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 4:41 pm
Location: McDwyane's

Postby Andrew on Sun Aug 26, 2007 2:43 pm

Posey is a good pickup for Boston. I can't see him averaging greater than the 7.7 ppg he contributed for the Heat last year but he's a decent shooter and a good defender so he'll add some quality depth to the team. With a trio like KG, Pierce and Allen the Celtics need their bench to be solid, not spectacular and Posey fits that bill.

grusom wrote:I like the Eddie House signing, but he's more of a sg in pg body IMO. Dan Dickau anyone?


That would be a decent move. Dickau isn't going to solve all their problems at point guard but he had a decent season with the Hornets back in 2005 starting 46 games for them and averaging around 13, 3 and 5 along with a steal per game. KG, Pierce and Allen are all adept at finding teammates and distributing the ball so the Celtics wouldn't need Dickau (or any of their point guards) to be Steve Nash.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115269
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

PreviousNext

Return to NBA & Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests