I would have agreed if this was me a couple years ago. Ask anyone that's been around long enough like benji or shadowgrin, how much I despised Kevin Love's game and that I argued everyone to death that he was nothing more than a "stat padder".
Ah fuck, this exactly is why I say I'd prefer Gay to Melo discussion. This is tiresome and pointless. So this will be my last post on topic of LMA vs Love.
Yao_Ming wrote:Aldridge basically carried the 10-11 Blazers to the playoffs (With Roy playing 47 of those games). That roster was arguably is no better or worst than the current Wolves. (Wolves are below .500 with Kevin Love's best record-wise season with a whopping 12-13 record). You can argue the West is crazy deep this year, but that year was just was deep with Rockets (43-39 and the Suns (40-42) not making the playoffs so excuses are limited.
That Rockets team was led by Kevin Martin with Luis Scola/Hayes in middle. The Suns had 37 year old Nash and Gortat. Aldridge was a better player than any of those players. In fact, he arguably was top 3 PF in West that season. Also Andre Miller was still better than Rubio ever was. Batum, and Matthews were also both better than Jared Dudley that Nash had. Add up bits of contribution from defensive force Camby, young Gerald Wallace, corpse of Brandon Roy, hyped up Fernandez, etc, the Blazers actually got solid contribution from rest of the team. I am not saying Aldridge wasn't great but this again is a team effort which a lot of you seem to forget when it comes to how poorly the case applies to Kevin Love.
Yao_Ming wrote:Rubio is not much of a scoring guard, but he plays much like Rondo is terms of craftyness, defense, and underrated rebounding (One triple double this season),
That drives me crazy. Complete nonsense talk. Rondo's a guy that can take it to the rim at will and finish at high percentage, all without needs of being assisted. That alone makes him special. And Rondo maintained around 50 AST% for years. That's half of all baskets scored by Celtics while he was on the floor. He's also played a defensive stopper role consistently, guarding opponent perimeter threats whenever needed.
There are major flaws in Rubio's game that's holding him back. League avg of PER is 15, and that is where exactly Rubio's at even through eye test. It's not too surprising why. He turns over almost 1/4 of possessions he uses. That'd be forgivable if he was shooting better and assisting at higher rate but he isn't. Good things just come too scarce to justify. Only thing that really keeps his value going is his excellent steal ability. He has a long way to go before being called a valuable player from an avg player. The Wolves need more, more from him on offensive end.
Yao_Ming wrote:while Kevin Martin not in his prime putting up 21 points game isn't scrub numbers neither, Pek puts up 16 points a game, I think he's a biy above average (depending on what you think is a average center), Brewer is a good 3 and D and Love's favorite outlet guy, Chase Budginer is good (out), Dante Cunningham is a good energy role player, JJ Barea still screws teams over, Mbah a Moute is a serviceable defender, and Alexey Shved can ball although his confidence isn't there.
Kevin Martin has been on downhill since hot start to the season. His PER dropped from 24 to 18.5. Kinda explains why the Wolves have been struggling lately. When your second best player is Kevin Martin and he struggles like shit, your team's not going to win too many games. Then you have Pekovic, who is probably average in everything offensively, then there's defense, he can't block a shot or move well for a center (though his size helps).
Jose Barea is having a worst season since his rookie year. Even if he wasn't, he isn't your ideal first tier depth if you wanted to contend. Brewer played second most minutes and has PER 11.3 which is almost equivalent to rookie Robbie Hummel's. At least Brewer plays a defensive stopper role, lol. But you can see how much it says about talent level outside of Kevin Love. They probably had to keep Kirilenko, he was quite good last season.
Yao_Ming wrote:On go-to moves, K-Love is shooting 44% this year with 2.6 turnovers, compared to LA's 48.5% with 1.9 turnovers(efficiency where?),
TS% is more accurate way to measure ability to score because getting to the line and hitting at higher rate, and making 3s are also important skills. Think about this. Hitting 2 threes in 5 attempts is equal to hitting 3 two pointers in 5 attempts, but former penalizes your FG%.
Also think about this, LMA takes 20 to score whatever he's averaging, Kevin Love takes approx 1.5 less attempts per game to avg more than LMA. Even better, both are identical in ball usage%, yet Love scores more assists more at vastly better rate.
Yao_Ming wrote:LA has dominated him with a crazy 11-2 record and LA stats (21.4/8.7/2.0/0.8 stl/1 blk on 51% shooting) overwhelms Love's(17.8/10.7/2.1/.6 stl/.1 blk on 44.2% shooting) And remember, there was some talk of the Wolve's being in the playoffs and Blazers not.
Majority of difference comes from Kevin Love's rookie/sopho seasons. Does that even sound fair to you?
Also consider this. Bill Russell's team beat Wilt Chamberlain's team a lot more but it don't make him a better player. Because that's stupid and illogical.
Yao_Ming wrote:I'm also not saying K-Love isn't a elite PF, or how this isn't still all David Kahn's fault, but give credit to LA who keeps improving every year and at least deserves to be in the convo about being one of the elite PF's we have right now.
Nobody's denying LMA's great value. It's just that, to any stat person, this season's Kevin Love is the best PF undeniably ala CP3 always has been at PG position.