koberulz wrote:It's called regression to the mean. It happens.
Sauru wrote:a good example was late game fisher got by his man, had a clean look at the hoop but instead of leaning in and taking his shot he jumped back into the defender. he made the basket and there was no call but more often than not they call that kind of play.
benji wrote:koberulz wrote:It's called regression to the mean. It happens.
You keep using that phrase. I do not think it means what you think it means.
z02 wrote:He sets a 3-POINT RECORD and then the next game all he scores are two foul shots and goes 0-13 from the field!!! There's no question Ray Allen lost this for them.
Lean wrote:That''s how Rasheed guaran-sheed things.
Andrew wrote:"Big game, but why so emotional?" Possibly the worst question a courtside reporter has ever asked.
Rip32 wrote:Except Sheed's guaran-sheeds were actually correct occasionally.![]()
benji wrote:Rip32 wrote:Except Sheed's guaran-sheeds were actually correct occasionally.![]()
Pierce can still be correct. The Celtics just have to lose the next two games and the series won't go back to Los Angeles.
dare wrote:Now Pierce is predicting the Celtics will bounce back.
Pierce " I'm not going to win a game in LA, I'm saying we're going to lose at home."
Sauru wrote:most times than not the offensive player in the one to initiate the contact (btw i am speaking general terms now not just this last game) and i think that is one of the things the league needs to address. that and the amount of players diving under people to draw a charge.
a good example was late game fisher got by his man, had a clean look at the hoop but instead of leaning in and taking his shot he jumped back into the defender. he made the basket and there was no call but more often than not they call that kind of play.
Andrew wrote:As for the officials having influence on the game, that's inevitable since they're the ones making the calls (which is their job, after all).
That's the ideal, but it's also expecting perfection of the referees and I don't we can feasibly expect that of any human being. Referees aren't going to be immune to bad angles or the influence of players flopping and selling contact.
That's why I'd expand the instant replay a little further to allow review of other calls that are left up to referee judgement
or simply place a limit on the amount of calls you can challenge, similar to timeouts.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests