We could do a couple of numbers each week, run a poll and maturity talk about who's better at that number.
Should be fun
Menopauss wrote:I'm up for it.
We evaluate players throughout history or just the three point era ?
Just on-court impact or does off-court count too ?
Use just stats from seasons where THE player wore THE number ?
How long should voting last and how many choices per number ?
I suggest going one number at a time as some are going to get really crowded.
Andrew wrote:I'm in favour of "majority of their career" criteria. Otherwise, you could mark down MJ as a candidate for #12, in addition to #23 and #45.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests